Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
|
Here in America the level of public safety declines as the temperature rises,the drought area expands,the public officials whaffle and spew drivel and the lunatic fringe has a ball killing people consistently. In your home,in the cinema,in the street,in school and in most any other place one cares to mention ,one can get shot. Most of the perpetrators have doubtful records but we only have a programme which embraces locking up nutters after they have done their murderous acts so there is no prevention taking place. Government and the politicians turn a deaf ear to the matter of a lack of public safety and they sometimes mumble drivel about these problems but they are all ineffectual Jackasses when it comes to establishing legislation to provide for increased public safety. The question is how should we handle ,in our nation,the lunatic fringe which has no scruples about the killings?. How do other countries handle these antisocial groups who are only dedicated to violence and mayhem?
|
|
|
By not electing them into power?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
|
Give them a season ticket at the New Den.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
|
With a number 2....and tons of Brylcreem.
.......has Gus done a Poo'yet, without thinking about us! |
|
|
The real problem is that we are all on the fringe, and capable lunatics.
.......has Gus done a Poo'yet, without thinking about us! |
|
|
There can be no fair way to handle people with violent tendencies before they express them. If we knew more about the markers for violence and low empathy in brain chemistry then we could screen everybody from a young age perhaps. We could identify those most at risk and implement actions. Is that fair? Not everyone in that group will ultimately enact that possible nature. Some of them could have very good upbringings which counteract this nature, some of them might those military careers where these attributes aren't so problematical and can be modified and moded. In my view the future of gene therapy can eventually produce a form of useful eugenics on mass populations by reducing the instances of poor genes from the human pool. This statement is very much an aspiration and very much far in excess of where the technology is now. Also human behaviour is very complex and not just a factor of one gene but the interplay between many. All of that would have to be understood and also the 'how' of what is needed to alter or remove them effectively without harm. Still, anti-social behaviour, while it could be reduced by successful genetic modification it couldn't be wiped out. We have the truth that human behaviour is significantly influenced by our environment: family, friends and so on. Still, I'm firmly of the view that a hundred years from now medical science will have played a significant role in reducing social and violent problems across the civilised globe.
|
|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Aug 2012 11.01pm
By not electing them into power?
Or, by not allowing the likes of the NRA to lobby and donate millions of bucks to Political parties? To clarify the Second Amendment to what its intended meaning was rather than what has been adopted by the Gun lobbies?
Isn’t it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? |
|
|
By giving Boris Johnson a haircut?
|
|
|
Quote blind eagle at 27 Aug 2012 9.41pm
Here in America the level of public safety declines as the temperature rises,the drought area expands,the public officials whaffle and spew drivel and the lunatic fringe has a ball killing people consistently. In your home,in the cinema,in the street,in school and in most any other place one cares to mention ,one can get shot. Most of the perpetrators have doubtful records but we only have a programme which embraces locking up nutters after they have done their murderous acts so there is no prevention taking place. Government and the politicians turn a deaf ear to the matter of a lack of public safety and they sometimes mumble drivel about these problems but they are all ineffectual Jackasses when it comes to establishing legislation to provide for increased public safety. The question is how should we handle ,in our nation,the lunatic fringe which has no scruples about the killings?. How do other countries handle these antisocial groups who are only dedicated to violence and mayhem? Any country that legally allows people (and by that I mean mentally deficient sub human Cleytus Clampit type people) to own an M16 with very very little security checks deserves what it gets. It may sound harsh but if your firearm ownership laws are, well non existent really, what do you expect? It never ceases to amaze me that whilst Americans constantly belly ache about the shootings etc etc, the minute any one mentions stricter gun control they crack on like you've just pissed on their kids on Christmas day. Mad as a bag of frogs those yanks.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
|
Quote dannyh at 28 Aug 2012 5.06pm
Quote blind eagle at 27 Aug 2012 9.41pm
Here in America the level of public safety declines as the temperature rises,the drought area expands,the public officials whaffle and spew drivel and the lunatic fringe has a ball killing people consistently. In your home,in the cinema,in the street,in school and in most any other place one cares to mention ,one can get shot. Most of the perpetrators have doubtful records but we only have a programme which embraces locking up nutters after they have done their murderous acts so there is no prevention taking place. Government and the politicians turn a deaf ear to the matter of a lack of public safety and they sometimes mumble drivel about these problems but they are all ineffectual Jackasses when it comes to establishing legislation to provide for increased public safety. The question is how should we handle ,in our nation,the lunatic fringe which has no scruples about the killings?. How do other countries handle these antisocial groups who are only dedicated to violence and mayhem? Any country that legally allows people (and by that I mean mentally deficient sub human Cleytus Clampit type people) to own an M16 with very very little security checks deserves what it gets. It may sound harsh but if your firearm ownership laws are, well non existent really, what do you expect? It never ceases to amaze me that whilst Americans constantly belly ache about the shootings etc etc, the minute any one mentions stricter gun control they crack on like you've just pissed on their kids on Christmas day. Mad as a bag of frogs those yanks. I agree wholeheartedly with this post. Particularly the part in bold.
"I'm not going to do a crossword for you either. I’m not doing it for you or anybody else. I think it’s trivial. It’s everything that is wrong with the British media. What do you want me to do next, kiss a model?" Ken Livingstone |
|
|
But......Switzerland have more guns per person than an antagonized Bonnie & Clyde on their 23rd can of red bull, yet seem to be quite pleased with themselves.
.......has Gus done a Poo'yet, without thinking about us! |
|
|
Quote cornwalls palace at 28 Aug 2012 6.04pm
But......Switzerland have more guns per person than an antagonized Bonnie & Clyde on their 23rd can of red bull, yet seem to be quite pleased with themselves. Probably realised a few decades ago that they were woefully under equipped for any wars. All they had were those little flick knives...
"I'm not going to do a crossword for you either. I’m not doing it for you or anybody else. I think it’s trivial. It’s everything that is wrong with the British media. What do you want me to do next, kiss a model?" Ken Livingstone |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2012 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.