Poyet to court?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 jamieb73  Balham 17 Jul 13 1.57pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| May11th1979 Crawley 17 Jul 13 3.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Oh god I hope so. Hope it goes his way and costs them a packet.
A five year old child could do this! Somebody fetch me a five year old child. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
collier row eagle  romford essex via another galaxy 17 Jul 13 3.16pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
just for once i am liking poyet, take em gus take em!!!!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Southampton_Eagle At the after party 17 Jul 13 3.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Uncle Tony's already getting the money together to pay him off - charging a booking fee for the cup game, not putting on the park & ride scheme to save cash & then changing the club charter without consultation when this was queried. The honeymoon seems over.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 18 Jul 13 3.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I love the fact that each time there is another article about Poyet they mention Palace beating them in the play-off final. Brighton fans must hate this so for this alone I hope this drags on and on. It's win win for us. Either Brighton will be forced to air their dirty laundry in public and admit why he was sacked or they will need to pay him off leaving them with an even smaller transfer budget after Bloom's gamble didn't pay off. It's the story that just keeps on giving.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 18 Jul 13 4.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I don't know how the process is supposed to work - but the appeal was heard by 3 members of the board, so not entirely independent.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 18 Jul 13 10.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote chris123 at 18 Jul 2013 4.30pm
I don't know how the process is supposed to work - but the appeal was heard by 3 members of the board, so not entirely independent. This appeal was only ever going to have one outcome. It seems that what he did isn't in doubt (what that is is still unknown) what Poyet and the LMA are saying is that it shouldn't have been enough to get him the sack. I can't believe that either the email or the post match comments could be considered a sackable offence.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.