Unbelievable isn't it?

Let's just overlook the fact that matching their formation completely killed their momentum and allowed us to be more attacking.

I heard five people moaning about a 'defensive' sub and not one of them credited Pulis with moving Chamakh up top and Puncheon into the free role. We created more chances and half chances after that supposedly defensive move than we did for the rest of the game.

Yes, O'Keefe and Wilbraham were defensive subs but with so little time left can you blame him?

I can't remember a Palace manager who has been so flexible or bold with his subs. He's decisive and he makes the decision early.

It's also the first time I can remember us actually looking like we have worked out set piece routines.

I'm torn between the set piece success of yesteryear and the goals from open play to be honest. I'd prefer a goal scorer from open play, but our set piece work needs inpmroving.

So some think taking off our main threat for Paddy is a good idea, thank god you ain't managers. Paddy did FA apart from a shot that nearly hit the corner flag yeah played well, get a grip.

I thought it was a great tactical display from Tony Pulis. When Hull changed in the second half he went 3 at the back to combat and when they changed again so did he, top performance.