Who will make way for Murray

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

sprites Auckland 11 Feb 14 12.22am
Quote sprites at 11 Feb 2014 12.21am Bolasie, unfortunately. Jedinak Puncheon Bannan Ince Chamakh Murray ...is how i see it. Sorry - i should add i know Pulis aint gonna play Bazza. Just what i would do.
Alert a moderator to this post

sprites

Auckland 11 Feb 14 12.22am

Quote sprites at 11 Feb 2014 12.21am

Bolasie, unfortunately.

Jedinak

Puncheon Bannan Ince

Chamakh Murray

...is how i see it.

Sorry - i should add i know Pulis aint gonna play Bazza. Just what i would do.

Alert a moderator to this post

MikeT Burlington (Toronto Area) 11 Feb 14 2.57am
Quote PALACE FOR EVER at 10 Feb 2014 4.54pm If out of our four defenders Ledley isn't one of them, you have six outfielders left to pick Which for me these are from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. So is it two from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, or Ledley as defensive midfielders with Ledley playing more 'box to box'. For me Ledley plus other. Then four from Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. For me Ince, Chamakh & Murray then one from Puncheon & Bolasie. For me Bolasie, Ince, Chamakh & Murray. So for me its GK + 4 defenders, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. As TP seems to have a good understanding with players that they may have to play out of position this will change with who we are playing. A lesser version (standard) of total football or am I going OTT? This is close. Mine would be: Jedinak Ledley Puncheon Ince Bolasie Chamakh Murray on as a late sub replacing Puncheon or Bolasie.
Alert a moderator to this post

MikeT

Burlington (Toronto Area) 11 Feb 14 2.57am

Quote PALACE FOR EVER at 10 Feb 2014 4.54pm

If out of our four defenders Ledley isn't one of them, you have six outfielders left to pick

Which for me these are from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray.

So is it two from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, or Ledley as defensive midfielders with Ledley playing more 'box to box'. For me Ledley plus other.

Then four from Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. For me Ince, Chamakh & Murray then one from Puncheon & Bolasie. For me Bolasie, Ince, Chamakh & Murray.

So for me its GK + 4 defenders, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray.

As TP seems to have a good understanding with players that they may have to play out of position this will change with who we are playing. A lesser version (standard) of total football or am I going OTT?

This is close. Mine would be:

Jedinak Ledley
Puncheon Ince Bolasie
Chamakh

Murray on as a late sub replacing Puncheon or Bolasie.

Alert a moderator to this post

sprites Auckland 11 Feb 14 3.29am
Quote MikeT at 11 Feb 2014 2.57am Quote PALACE FOR EVER at 10 Feb 2014 4.54pm If out of our four defenders Ledley isn't one of them, you have six outfielders left to pick Which for me these are from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. So is it two from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, or Ledley as defensive midfielders with Ledley playing more 'box to box'. For me Ledley plus other. Then four from Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. For me Ince, Chamakh & Murray then one from Puncheon & Bolasie. For me Bolasie, Ince, Chamakh & Murray. So for me its GK + 4 defenders, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. As TP seems to have a good understanding with players that they may have to play out of position this will change with who we are playing. A lesser version (standard) of total football or am I going OTT? This is close. Mine would be: Jedinak Ledley Puncheon Ince Bolasie Chamakh Murray on as a late sub replacing Puncheon or Bolasie. But why start Chamakh leading the line when clearly his best position is just behind the main striker?
Alert a moderator to this post

sprites

Auckland 11 Feb 14 3.29am

Quote MikeT at 11 Feb 2014 2.57am

Quote PALACE FOR EVER at 10 Feb 2014 4.54pm

If out of our four defenders Ledley isn't one of them, you have six outfielders left to pick

Which for me these are from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray.

So is it two from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, or Ledley as defensive midfielders with Ledley playing more 'box to box'. For me Ledley plus other.

Then four from Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. For me Ince, Chamakh & Murray then one from Puncheon & Bolasie. For me Bolasie, Ince, Chamakh & Murray.

So for me its GK + 4 defenders, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray.

This is close. Mine would be:

Jedinak Ledley
Puncheon Ince Bolasie
Chamakh

Murray on as a late sub replacing Puncheon or Bolasie.

But why start Chamakh leading the line when clearly his best position is just behind the main striker?

Alert a moderator to this post

pstrutt Busselton, WA 11 Feb 14 7.53am
Speroni Ward / Gabbs / DD / Murray Bolasie / Jedi / Ledley / Puncheon Ince / Chamakh Try it TP. IT.MIGHT.WORK! So I manage a Workshop which provides a safe learning environment for blokes struggling with PTSD and other mental health issues. Being a Palace fan isn't listed yet.
Alert a moderator to this post

pstrutt

Busselton, WA 11 Feb 14 7.53am

Speroni

Ward / Gabbs / DD / Murray

Bolasie / Jedi / Ledley / Puncheon

Ince / Chamakh

Try it TP. IT.MIGHT.WORK!

So I manage a Workshop which provides a safe learning environment for blokes struggling with PTSD and other mental health issues. Being a Palace fan isn't listed yet.

Alert a moderator to this post

MikeT Burlington (Toronto Area) 11 Feb 14 9.27am
Quote sprites at 11 Feb 2014 3.29am Quote MikeT at 11 Feb 2014 2.57am Quote PALACE FOR EVER at 10 Feb 2014 4.54pm If out of our four defenders Ledley isn't one of them, you have six outfielders left to pick Which for me these are from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. So is it two from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, or Ledley as defensive midfielders with Ledley playing more 'box to box'. For me Ledley plus other. Then four from Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. For me Ince, Chamakh & Murray then one from Puncheon & Bolasie. For me Bolasie, Ince, Chamakh & Murray. So for me its GK + 4 defenders, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. As TP seems to have a good understanding with players that they may have to play out of position this will change with who we are playing. A lesser version (standard) of total football or am I going OTT? This is close. Mine would be: Jedinak Ledley Puncheon Ince Bolasie Chamakh Murray on as a late sub replacing Puncheon or Bolasie. But why start Chamakh leading the line when clearly his best position is just behind the main striker? Given Murray is unlikely to be fit enough for a full 90 minutes for quite a few games, Chamakh leading the line with Ince in the hole is the best option and worked well against West Brom. Ince was prepared to go beyond Cham and they often exchanged positions.
Alert a moderator to this post

MikeT

Burlington (Toronto Area) 11 Feb 14 9.27am

Quote sprites at 11 Feb 2014 3.29am

Quote MikeT at 11 Feb 2014 2.57am

Quote PALACE FOR EVER at 10 Feb 2014 4.54pm

If out of our four defenders Ledley isn't one of them, you have six outfielders left to pick

Which for me these are from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray.

So is it two from Dikgacoi, Jedinak, or Ledley as defensive midfielders with Ledley playing more 'box to box'. For me Ledley plus other.

Then four from Ince, Puncheon, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray. For me Ince, Chamakh & Murray then one from Puncheon & Bolasie. For me Bolasie, Ince, Chamakh & Murray.

So for me its GK + 4 defenders, Jedinak, Ledley, Ince, Bolasie, Chamakh & Murray.

This is close. Mine would be:

Jedinak Ledley
Puncheon Ince Bolasie
Chamakh

Murray on as a late sub replacing Puncheon or Bolasie.

But why start Chamakh leading the line when clearly his best position is just behind the main striker?

Given Murray is unlikely to be fit enough for a full 90 minutes for quite a few games, Chamakh leading the line with Ince in the hole is the best option and worked well against West Brom. Ince was prepared to go beyond Cham and they often exchanged positions.

Alert a moderator to this post

Arthur Blackpudding 11 Feb 14 10.16am
If and when Murray is fully fit, which won't be for a few games I can see the midfield and attack being like this. ------Jedi Ledley Punch------------Ince -----Chamakh ----------Murray
Alert a moderator to this post

Arthur Blackpudding

11 Feb 14 10.16am

Send a Private Message to Arthur Blackpudding

If and when Murray is fully fit, which won't be for a few games I can see the midfield and attack being like this.

------Jedi Ledley
Punch------------Ince
-----Chamakh
----------Murray

Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b Landrindod, Wales 11 Feb 14 3.33pm
Although the knives are out for Jerome I can't help thinking just how much on the ball skill he has to offer. Sometimes it's so smooth that I take it a step further and see him as the main man with Glen up front. Thankfully this unpopular scenario wont happen for a long time as Mr 30 goals will not be ready for some time yet.
Alert a moderator to this post

adrian b

Landrindod, Wales 11 Feb 14 3.33pm

Although the knives are out for Jerome I can't help thinking just how much on the ball skill he has to offer. Sometimes it's so smooth that I take it a step further and see him as the main man with Glen up front. Thankfully this unpopular scenario wont happen for a long time as Mr 30 goals will not be ready for some time yet.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Who will make way for Murray

Site Map

Sponsors