You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ron Noades to be honoured
April 23 2024 8.14am

Ron Noades to be honoured

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 11 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

 

View sydtheeagle's Profile sydtheeagle Flag England 17 Feb 14 3.36pm Send a Private Message to sydtheeagle Add sydtheeagle as a friend

It appears that Ron was a good husband and father. Palace also achieved something of a golden period during his ownership. For all the carping, an epitaph most of us would be proud of.

 


Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 17 Feb 14 3.50pm

Quote Plane at 17 Feb 2014 2.31pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 17 Feb 2014 10.51am

Quote Plane at 16 Feb 2014 2.00pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Feb 2014 11.20am

Quote Plane at 16 Feb 2014 11.18am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Feb 2014 11.07am

Quote Plane at 16 Feb 2014 10.54am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 15 Feb 2014 4.15pm

My post did make the point that it was not illegal (highlighted in red).

Whilst his actions broke no laws, he was hardly being a benefactor to CPFC as he had bought the club for a song and could have led Palace to even greater success but he chose to be greedy and cash in.

That behaviour does not warrant him being "honoured" by the club, in my opinion.

Yes, I can read.

So chairmen need to be benefactors to the club to fulfil your ideal of a chairman, perhaps you ought to mention that to CPFC2010, should they just plough all of their wealth in to satisfy your ambition? He bought the club for a song as it had been run down by the previous incumbent and no-one else wanted it, or put another way, he saw an opportunity and had the money to achieve it.

You've side stepped the question I want you and others to answer, why shouldn't he spend money made from his business?


I can read too.

If you can read why did you feel the need to point out something I had already acknowledged?

Why are you being so aggressive? You have an opinion and so do I. No need for it.

I have not "sidestepped" anything but made it plain that I do not regard him as a benefactor and therefore totally unacceptable as a potential candidate to be honoured.

Earlier you suggested that Noades was similar to myself (based on my right leaning politics and capitalist views I guess), but as far as Palace is concerned he is nothing like me - if I had a windfall I would donate it to Palace without question. I would not be looking for a return on my money.

Lets hope I've cleared that up without the need for you to be in my face about it.... LOL

Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Feb 2014 11.09am)


I'm not being aggressive Hoof, there's not any point in pursuing this as you have again failed to answer anything I've asked you.


I haven't though?


OK, highlight for me where you have answered this much asked question, the one I've highlighted in red.

From your comments on this topic after this post, you seem unable to acknowledge that Noades did anything correctly, as I've said before, try taking your emotion out of the equation and look at the facts.


You're still being quite aggressive whereas I am stating quite calmly what I think of Noades - which incidentally mirror the thoughts of most Brentford fans that feel equally ripped off from "Uncle Ron".

To try and answer your question... yes I do believe that football club chairmen should be benefactors. What is wrong with that?

There are precious few margins to make money if you run the club to a success on field and maintain the dignity/history of the club. We have all seen the fcuk ups at Portsmouth and the recent shenanigans at Hull and Cardiff.

As I have already stated Noades bought our club for a song and when things started to improve he used it as a cash cow to fund his desire to set up a few golf clubs. We have already determined that his actions were not illegal, but he can hardly be regarded as someone to be honoured because he clearly had no love for Palace otherwise he would have tried to make us as successful as we possibly could be.

So in summary I believe that Noades had no right to redistribute CPFC assets to his other businesses because he was acting as a temporary "steward" of the club and as such had a duty of care to protect the ongoing stability of it for past present and future fans.

I'd really love for you to point out where I'm being aggressive, in your mind perhaps. Anyway I won't be contributing to this thread lest I be accused of bullying next.

You're quite adept at playing the victim when need be.


I've kept my responses to the facts as I see them whereas you accuse me of not being able to keep emotion out of the equation which infers that my arguments are baseless.

By all means disagree with my viewpoints but don't undermine my right to air them on the basis that I am not in a fit state of mind to debate.

I'm not playing a victim but asserting my right to debate with you on a level playing field.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 17 Feb 14 3.51pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Willo at 17 Feb 2014 3.32pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 3.21pm
Kelsley and HBOS were indeed charging us 」1.2m per annum. Ron then again tried to buy the ground from PwC to then profit again by charging rent at roughly 」600k year.

Noades was interested in getting a group together to buy the 'Freehold' but he categorically stated that IF he had done so he would have charged CPFC 10% of gate money which he used to do before.



No he didn't. You're passing assumptions off as fact again.


[Link]

The link to the SLP has since expired however it was pasted here on the BBS. He catagorically says, from his own mouth that the rent would be roughly half what SJ was charged by Kelmsley & HBOS.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Online Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 17 Feb 14 4.02pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 3.51pm

No he didn't. You're passing assumptions off as fact again.

Hogwash.

This is what Noades said : 的 was interested in getting a group together to buy the freehold and lease it back at the rate I used to, 10 per cent of the gate receipts." He said this in March 2010 whereas your link is in Jan 2010.

You and I can throw figures about but the fact remains is that the figures are a far cry from the 」1.2 Million per year which Jordan was paying.


Edited by Willo (17 Feb 2014 4.08pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 17 Feb 14 4.14pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Willo at 17 Feb 2014 4.02pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 3.51pm

No he didn't. You're passing assumptions off as fact again.

Hogwash.

This is what Noades said : 的 was interested in getting a group together to buy the freehold and lease it back at the rate I used to, 10 per cent of the gate receipts." He said this in March 2010 whereas your link is in Jan 2010.

You and I can throw figures about but the fact remains is that the figures are a far cry from the 」1.2 Million per year which Jordan was paying.


Edited by Willo (17 Feb 2014 4.08pm)

Did you not read the direct quote in the link I just supplied? Let me write it again so you don't miss it again. Remember this is EXACTLY what he said:

"I had a group of people that would have bought the leasehold and leased it back to the club at half the rent Jordan had"

Now do f*ck off you bullsh*tting argumentative f*cktard.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Online Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 17 Feb 14 4.16pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 4.14pm

Now do f*ck off you bullsh*tting argumentative f*cktard.

When you resort to such comments this is a clear sign that you have lost the argument.

YES I took the trouble to read the link which was dated Jan 10, whereas the comments regarding the 10% were made months later.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 17 Feb 14 4.21pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Willo at 17 Feb 2014 4.16pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 4.14pm

Now do f*ck off you bullsh*tting argumentative f*cktard.

When you resort to such comments this is a clear sign that you have lost the argument.

YES I took the trouble to read the link which was dated Jan 10, whereas the comments regarding the 10% were made months later.

I haven't been carded for years but you really p*ss me off.

What part of 'direct quote' do you not understand. Are you calling Noades a liar because that is exactly what he said. Where is your link to prove me wrong?
And you say you're not a troll? Whatever.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 17 Feb 14 4.21pm

Quote Willo at 17 Feb 2014 4.02pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 3.51pm

No he didn't. You're passing assumptions off as fact again.

Hogwash.

This is what Noades said : 的 was interested in getting a group together to buy the freehold and lease it back at the rate I used to, 10 per cent of the gate receipts." He said this in March 2010 whereas your link is in Jan 2010.

You and I can throw figures about but the fact remains is that the figures are a far cry from the 」1.2 Million per year which Jordan was paying.

Edited by Willo (17 Feb 2014 4.08pm)


Why do you always put hogwash or tosh in your replies?

Stick to replying to the points made and let us decide whether it is hogwash or tosh.

Also it would be nice if you added some documentary evidence to the "facts" that you keep quoting about Noades which I find hard to believe.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 17 Feb 14 4.24pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Hoof Hearted at 17 Feb 2014 4.21pm

Quote Willo at 17 Feb 2014 4.02pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 3.51pm

No he didn't. You're passing assumptions off as fact again.

Hogwash.

This is what Noades said : 的 was interested in getting a group together to buy the freehold and lease it back at the rate I used to, 10 per cent of the gate receipts." He said this in March 2010 whereas your link is in Jan 2010.

You and I can throw figures about but the fact remains is that the figures are a far cry from the 」1.2 Million per year which Jordan was paying.

Edited by Willo (17 Feb 2014 4.08pm)


Why do you always put hogwash or tosh in your replies?

Stick to replying to the points made and let us decide whether it is hogwash or tosh.

Also it would be nice if you added some documentary evidence to the "facts" that you keep quoting about Noades which I find hard to believe.

Apparently what Ron Noades said is bollocks because Willo says so. I honestly give up on this clown.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 17 Feb 14 4.28pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 4.24pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 17 Feb 2014 4.21pm

Quote Willo at 17 Feb 2014 4.02pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 3.51pm

No he didn't. You're passing assumptions off as fact again.

Hogwash.

This is what Noades said : 的 was interested in getting a group together to buy the freehold and lease it back at the rate I used to, 10 per cent of the gate receipts." He said this in March 2010 whereas your link is in Jan 2010.

You and I can throw figures about but the fact remains is that the figures are a far cry from the 」1.2 Million per year which Jordan was paying.

Edited by Willo (17 Feb 2014 4.08pm)


Why do you always put hogwash or tosh in your replies?

Stick to replying to the points made and let us decide whether it is hogwash or tosh.

Also it would be nice if you added some documentary evidence to the "facts" that you keep quoting about Noades which I find hard to believe.

Apparently what Ron Noades said is bollocks because Willo says so. I honestly give up on this clown.



He keeps insulting people but never backs any of his claims with evidence.

Keep your cool though because he is painting himself into a corner.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Online Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 17 Feb 14 4.31pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 4.21pm

I haven't been carded for years but you really p*ss me off.

What part of 'direct quote' do you not understand. Are you calling Noades a liar because that is exactly what he said. Where is your link to prove me wrong?
And you say you're not a troll? Whatever.

Who says I don't understand the 'Direct quote' ? This is rather disrespectful of you to suggest such a thing.

I am NOT calling Noades a liar at all, I am merely stating that months later he referred to the 10% and even went so far as to state that gate receips were 」3.4 Mill which would equate to a rent of 」340,000 a year ! It is very feasible that there had been a shift in the intervening months !

As for being a 'Troll' - I shall treat this with the contempt it deserves.
At least I have NOT stopped to the level you have by resorting to personal insults.


Edited by Willo (17 Feb 2014 4.32pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Southampton_Eagle's Profile Southampton_Eagle Flag At the after party 17 Feb 14 4.34pm Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle Add Southampton_Eagle as a friend

Quote Willo at 17 Feb 2014 4.31pm

Quote Southampton_Eagle at 17 Feb 2014 4.21pm

I haven't been carded for years but you really p*ss me off.

What part of 'direct quote' do you not understand. Are you calling Noades a liar because that is exactly what he said. Where is your link to prove me wrong?
And you say you're not a troll? Whatever.

Who says I don't understand the 'Direct quote' ? This is rather disrespectful of you to suggest such a thing.

I am NOT calling Noades a liar at all, I am merely stating that months later he referred to the 10% and even went so far as to state that gate receips were 」3.4 Mill which would equate to a rent of 」340,000 a year ! It is very feasible that there had been a shift in the intervening months !

As for being a 'Troll' - I shall treat this with the contempt it deserves.
At least I have NOT stopped to the level you have by resorting to personal insults.


Edited by Willo (17 Feb 2014 4.32pm)


I found a quote, where's yours? If you can't provide one then your little credibility will be shot to pieces.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 9 of 11 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Ron Noades to be honoured