You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > isis
April 19 2024 4.03am

isis

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 85 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

 

View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 29 Jul 14 4.39pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.36pm

And another thread is killed...


To be fair, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen anyone on a general talk thread change their mind. It always descends into a tit for tat exchange....

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 29 Jul 14 4.43pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.04pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 3.59pm

Zzzzzz


Run Forrest, run.

Always hated that movie.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 29 Jul 14 4.46pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.38pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.36pm

And another thread is killed...


...because you can't finish, or won't finish , what you have started.

It is pathetic for you say anything different.

Sorry did you say something that wasn't sniping?
I stated earlier that u. S withdrawal left a power vacuum in Iraq. I asked whether this would have happened if saddam hadn't been deposed, which you took to mean that I supported saddam murdering people. And you call me thick. Mr my solution is to nuke the middle East.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 29 Jul 14 6.28pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.46pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.38pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.36pm

And another thread is killed...


...because you can't finish, or won't finish , what you have started.

It is pathetic for you say anything different.

Sorry did you say something that wasn't sniping?
I stated earlier that u. S withdrawal left a power vacuum in Iraq. I asked whether this would have happened if saddam hadn't been deposed, which you took to mean that I supported saddam murdering people. And you call me thick. Mr my solution is to nuke the middle East.

Gusset I have asked you repeatedly what was the alternative to Saddam being removed from power and you have said you don't know. So, therefore, you are against slaughter yet against removing those perpetuating slaughter. What do you propose for sorting out the Middle East, other than continually offering 'solidarity' and expressions of 'despair' at what is going on? Please tell us.

As for the nuke thing earlier, even a man of your intelligence could realise that was a joke.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 29 Jul 14 6.39pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 6.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.46pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.38pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.36pm

And another thread is killed...


...because you can't finish, or won't finish , what you have started.

It is pathetic for you say anything different.

Sorry did you say something that wasn't sniping?
I stated earlier that u. S withdrawal left a power vacuum in Iraq. I asked whether this would have happened if saddam hadn't been deposed, which you took to mean that I supported saddam murdering people. And you call me thick. Mr my solution is to nuke the middle East.

Gusset I have asked you repeatedly what was the alternative to Saddam being removed from power and you have said you don't know. So, therefore, you are against slaughter yet against removing those perpetuating slaughter. What do you propose for sorting out the Middle East, other than continually offering 'solidarity' and expressions of 'despair' at what is going on? Please tell us.

As for the nuke thing earlier, even a man of your intelligence could realise that was a joke.


Good post.

It highlights the inconsistencies from some posters when they call for possible eventual military action (if diplomacy fails) in one conflict yet argue against it in another.

With Nick we can see this in calling for action against Israel due to the death of civilians.....Yet Saddam could kill thousands, year on year away from the cameras and yet action against that state and removing him becomes a terrible crime.

A previous thread about possible action in Syria also saw Nick side against military action.

But with Israel.....Well, he'd sanction action if they didn't stop......Mmmmmm.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Jul 2014 6.43pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 29 Jul 14 6.47pm

The age old dilemma. Keep a despot in power where there is "stability" but horrendous crimes like using chemical weapons against the Kurds, or if they go by force, the genie is out of the bottle after years of oppression and no developed political institutions...Same story whether its Iraq, Syria, Saudi or various other places....the difference now is that the genie has the potential to bite back right here at home.

In the mix is the importance of asking why kids with seemingly decent prospects go off to fight with ISIS...seems logical that they must feel they have no stake in the system here (probably reinforced every time Moslems in the UK are demonised as a group or individuals are randomly attacked for nothing more than their faith)...coupled with youth often idealistically getting into doctrines that seemingly explain why the world in unjust and against their community, and how to get rid of that (whether religion or communism in the 30's:the difference now that the doctrine is regressive rather than idealistically progressive. Throw into the mix knowingly allowing UK to become base for various exponents of jihad in the 1980's/90's and piles of Saudi money funding promulgation of wahabbism in mosques...

How do we break out of the spiral beyond unhelpful kneejerk stuff like nuke 'em all or say too many muslims in the UK.... quite apart from morality...they are not realistic solutions to anything...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 29 Jul 14 6.54pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 6.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.46pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.38pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.36pm

And another thread is killed...


...because you can't finish, or won't finish , what you have started.

It is pathetic for you say anything different.

Sorry did you say something that wasn't sniping?
I stated earlier that u. S withdrawal left a power vacuum in Iraq. I asked whether this would have happened if saddam hadn't been deposed, which you took to mean that I supported saddam murdering people. And you call me thick. Mr my solution is to nuke the middle East.

Gusset I have asked you repeatedly what was the alternative to Saddam being removed from power and you have said you don't know. So, therefore, you are against slaughter yet against removing those perpetuating slaughter. What do you propose for sorting out the Middle East, other than continually offering 'solidarity' and expressions of 'despair' at what is going on? Please tell us.

As for the nuke thing earlier, even a man of your intelligence could realise that was a joke.

And I have said the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq is probably going to cause more problems for us in the West than not invading. The rise of ISIS will cause many problems This most likely is an unintended consequence. However many people did say that the invasion would cause issues afterwards .
What I am saying is that having saddam keeping reigns on the various factions within a secular society where different religions lived is a lesser of two evils, however unpalatable it is because of his tyranny.
It is not the same as supporting the regime.
It's not a difficult standpoint to grasp.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 29 Jul 14 6.57pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 29 Jul 2014 6.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 6.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.46pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.38pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.36pm

And another thread is killed...


...because you can't finish, or won't finish , what you have started.

It is pathetic for you say anything different.

Sorry did you say something that wasn't sniping?
I stated earlier that u. S withdrawal left a power vacuum in Iraq. I asked whether this would have happened if saddam hadn't been deposed, which you took to mean that I supported saddam murdering people. And you call me thick. Mr my solution is to nuke the middle East.

Gusset I have asked you repeatedly what was the alternative to Saddam being removed from power and you have said you don't know. So, therefore, you are against slaughter yet against removing those perpetuating slaughter. What do you propose for sorting out the Middle East, other than continually offering 'solidarity' and expressions of 'despair' at what is going on? Please tell us.

As for the nuke thing earlier, even a man of your intelligence could realise that was a joke.


Good post.

It highlights the inconsistencies from some posters when they call for possible eventual military action (if diplomacy fails) in one conflict yet argue against it in another.

With Nick we can see this in calling for action against Israel due to the death of civilians.....Yet Saddam could kill thousands, year on year away from the cameras and yet action against that state and removing him becomes a terrible crime.

A previous thread about possible action in Syria also saw Nick side against military action.

But with Israel.....Well, he'd sanction action if they didn't stop......Mmmmmm.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Jul 2014 6.43pm)


You have hit a nail on the head, generally, about many of us. Do the ends justify the means or not? Are we against British military intervention/military aid in principle anywhere to help topple a repressive group/regime, or are we only opposed to it sometimes where it isn't against a regime/group we feel should be toppled, let alone all the grey areas in the middle? Many of us contradict ourselves when we take positions on issues like this, and that's not a "left" or a "right" thing...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 29 Jul 14 6.58pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote legaleagle at 29 Jul 2014 6.47pm

The age old dilemma. Keep a despot in power where there is "stability" but horrendous crimes like using chemical weapons against the Kurds, or if they go by force, the genie is out of the bottle after years of oppression and no developed political institutions...Same story whether its Iraq, Syria, Saudi or various other places....the difference now is that the genie has the potential to bite back right here at home.

In the mix is the importance of asking why kids with seemingly decent prospects go off to fight with ISIS...seems logical that they must feel they have no stake in the system here (probably reinforced every time Moslems in the UK are demonised as a group or individuals are randomly attacked for nothing more than their faith)...coupled with youth often idealistically getting into doctrines that seemingly explain why the world in unjust and against their community, and how to get rid of that (whether religion or communism in the 30's:the difference now that the doctrine is regressive rather than idealistically progressive. Throw into the mix knowingly allowing UK to become base for various exponents of jihad in the 1980's/90's and piles of Saudi money funding promulgation of wahabbism in mosques...

How do we break out of the spiral beyond unhelpful kneejerk stuff like nuke 'em all or say too many muslims in the UK.... quite apart from morality...they are not realistic solutions to anything...


Another good post.

It's a realistic verdict that the 'right' decision.....whatever that is.....Is rarely one that can't be criticised or knocked.

We only ever see the one line of history, the one we choose. We don't get to see what the consequences are of taking another route......People get to push forward alternatives without any of us really knowing if the results give an improvement.

As for disenfranchised Muslims leaving for extremist groups. Well, they are a tiny minority and it isn't for government to consider changing policy because small groups can contain individuals who would enact violence.

The problem in my view is more to do with the failure of multiculturalism and the creation of 'minority areas' where integration is minimal.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 29 Jul 14 7.05pm

There are no easy answers, or explanations.In my view, abandoning multiculturalism (however much more effectively it might have been implemented to date) at this point would be likely to increase "ghettoisation" and be like manna from heaven to those who want to stir things up and persuade young people integration is not the way forward...but that further dislocation from other groups is the only way forward...coupled with more extreme attitudes in other communities including the WASP one...

I think we sometimes forget what a long way we have come from life in the late 60's/70's and the extent of racism/alienation that was around then...we have multiculturalism to thank for that in some ways...it helped, not hinder. The problem now is a whole new one because of what's going on in jihadi-supporting circles worldwide and people's access to stuff from anywhere via the internet.


Edited by legaleagle (29 Jul 2014 7.05pm)

Edited by legaleagle (29 Jul 2014 7.10pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 29 Jul 14 7.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 6.54pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 6.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.46pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jul 2014 4.38pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2014 4.36pm

And another thread is killed...


...because you can't finish, or won't finish , what you have started.

It is pathetic for you say anything different.

Sorry did you say something that wasn't sniping?
I stated earlier that u. S withdrawal left a power vacuum in Iraq. I asked whether this would have happened if saddam hadn't been deposed, which you took to mean that I supported saddam murdering people. And you call me thick. Mr my solution is to nuke the middle East.

Gusset I have asked you repeatedly what was the alternative to Saddam being removed from power and you have said you don't know. So, therefore, you are against slaughter yet against removing those perpetuating slaughter. What do you propose for sorting out the Middle East, other than continually offering 'solidarity' and expressions of 'despair' at what is going on? Please tell us.

As for the nuke thing earlier, even a man of your intelligence could realise that was a joke.

And I have said the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq is probably going to cause more problems for us in the West than not invading. The rise of ISIS will cause many problems This most likely is an unintended consequence. However many people did say that the invasion would cause issues afterwards .
What I am saying is that having saddam keeping reigns on the various factions within a secular society where different religions lived is a lesser of two evils, however unpalatable it is because of his tyranny.
It is not the same as supporting the regime.
It's not a difficult standpoint to grasp.

Project it into Palestine Nick, its an interesting one to ponder.We help topple the Israelis. ISIS later (after all Israel is part of the Levant) take over much of the whole area including Palestine....

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Red-Blue-Yellow's Profile Red-Blue-Yellow Flag Surrey 29 Jul 14 7.16pm Send a Private Message to Red-Blue-Yellow Add Red-Blue-Yellow as a friend

Closed minds thrive behind closed borders and it matters little whether 'we've' shut them in or 'they've' shut us out.
The real problem created by ISIS is it's success. This breeds false beliefs in it's adherents and supporters that: A) - God has given His mandate to them,
and B) - The same message and methods will work elsewhere.

Just as happened after WW2, with de-Nazification programs in Germany and Austria, we will need to politically AND spiritually re-educate returning fighters.

 


I also enjoy posting on: Love Everton Forum, the Acceptable Face of Scouse Football.
[Link]
twitter.com/LuvEvertonForum
Come and give it a look, new members would be lovely.
Come and JOIN.
Or they'll nick your telly.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 6 of 85 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > isis