Nick's usual implicit response.....Some journalist wrote something....It backs me up.

Anyone who even saw Saville could kind of tell that hardly anyone really knew him and that very few people were close to him......But no....Nick 'bull in a china shop' is allowed to type any crap he likes.

Just how many people knew Saville but didn't know he was a pedeophile? It must be tons. The connection you make with Thatcher is truly disgraceful.

It's implicit, 'you were his mate, so you're infected'

You are out of order but as you're on a keyboard you don't pay the price.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

[Link]
[Link]
[Link]

Draw your own conclusions

The original quote in this thread was a tongue in cheek response in another thread about Thatcher's ties with Pol Pot. I didn't want the thread to change subject too much as it didn't deserve it.
Stirling, your response implied that Thatch didn't know J. S was a bit iffy. In fact, she was advised against Knighting him several times by her advisors.
One of the links in my last post asks the question, with J. S's close royal connections, it would stand to reason that security services would have made full checks on him. Sir Maggie would have known about this surely?

Please direct this post to Thatcher's estate....Sod it I'm tempted to myself.

Your implications are disgraceful and without foundation.

Thatcher was not a protector of pedophiles.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I have merely said Mags was mates with J. S. he had Xmas dinner with them several times.

That old whore was complicit in creating an environment for wickedness and deviant behaviour to flourish

walking down the holmesdale road to see the palace aces!