Thatcher and Saville

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 5 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Kermit8 Hevon 27 Feb 15 1.52pm
Tebbit was, at least, being honest a few months back.., During the 80's and Thacher's gov. "The protection of the establishment would have overridden other 'concerns'" So if you have the highest echelons being complicit by turning a blind eye then hardly surprising that the numerous abusive cvnts lower down the ladder thought every season was hunting season and there would be no problem. And we vote these people in? Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 27 Feb 15 1.52pm

Tebbit was, at least, being honest a few months back..,

During the 80's and Thacher's gov.

"The protection of the establishment would have overridden other 'concerns'"

So if you have the highest echelons being complicit by turning a blind eye then hardly surprising that the numerous abusive cvnts lower down the ladder thought every season was hunting season and there would be no problem.

And we vote these people in?

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 07 Mar 15 9.03am
[Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 07 Mar 15 9.03am

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Mar 15 9.23am
Quote Kermit8 at 27 Feb 2015 1.52pm Tebbit was, at least, being honest a few months back.., During the 80's and Thacher's gov. "The protection of the establishment would have overridden other 'concerns'" So if you have the highest echelons being complicit by turning a blind eye then hardly surprising that the numerous abusive cvnts lower down the ladder thought every season was hunting season and there would be no problem. And we vote these people in? As usual the left ignore people like Tebbit and portray him as a nutter..... unless of course he says something thing that they believe anyway. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Mar 15 9.23am

Quote Kermit8 at 27 Feb 2015 1.52pm

Tebbit was, at least, being honest a few months back..,

During the 80's and Thacher's gov.

"The protection of the establishment would have overridden other 'concerns'"

And we vote these people in?

As usual the left ignore people like Tebbit and portray him as a nutter..... unless of course he says something thing that they believe anyway.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Mar 15 9.25am
Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am [Link] The starting sentence of this article, 'Now that most of the major figures are dead, the truth is emerging '.......It tells you all you need to know about the reliability and trustworthiness of the thoughts therein. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Mar 15 9.25am

Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am

[Link]

The starting sentence of this article, 'Now that most of the major figures are dead, the truth is emerging '.......It tells you all you need to know about the reliability and trustworthiness of the thoughts therein.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Mar 15 9.26am
Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am [Link] The starting sentence of this article, 'Now that most of the major figures are dead, the truth is emerging '.......It tells you all you need to know about the reliability and trustworthiness of the thoughts therein. Thatcher can't sue.....So publish.....I view it with contempt. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Mar 15 9.26am

Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am

[Link]

Thatcher can't sue.....So publish.....I view it with contempt.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 07 Mar 15 9.34am
Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am [Link] Very harrowing stuff. Always knew Margaret was a cvnt. Hodge, that is. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 07 Mar 15 9.34am

Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am

[Link]

Very harrowing stuff. Always knew Margaret was a cvnt.

Hodge, that is.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 07 Mar 15 9.39am
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Mar 2015 9.26am Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am [Link] The starting sentence of this article, 'Now that most of the major figures are dead, the truth is emerging '.......It tells you all you need to know about the reliability and trustworthiness of the thoughts therein. Thatcher can't sue.....So publish.....I view it with contempt. As the authorities did with the awful stories told by the raped and abused youngsters over the decades. The lethargy they showed made them complicit in the most awful of crimes. Edited by Kermit8 (07 Mar 2015 9.39am) Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 07 Mar 15 9.39am

Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Mar 2015 9.26am

Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 9.03am

[Link]

Thatcher can't sue.....So publish.....I view it with contempt.

As the authorities did with the awful stories told by the raped and abused youngsters over the decades.

The lethargy they showed made them complicit in the most awful of crimes.

Edited by Kermit8 (07 Mar 2015 9.39am)

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Mar 15 11.04am
Quote Kermit8 at 07 Mar 2015 9.39am As the authorities did with the awful stories told by the raped and abused youngsters over the decades. The lethargy they showed made them complicit in the most awful of crimes. Edited by Kermit8 (07 Mar 2015 9.39am) That's nonsense. You pick at a few cases and represent it as, 'the authorities'.....I very much doubt that 'the authorities' contain people within them who support the rape or abuse of children. Large institutions by there very nature inflexible, slow moving and incompetent. The reality is that you don't know what has happened in any one particular case and are just jumping onto the usual bandwangon as a generalism. Where there is genuine evidence of a crime then it should be investigated......That is how the law works.....It doesn't work in hindsight. These are complex situations that require common sense applied to them.....Unfortunately that's in short supply. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Mar 15 11.04am

Quote Kermit8 at 07 Mar 2015 9.39am

As the authorities did with the awful stories told by the raped and abused youngsters over the decades.

The lethargy they showed made them complicit in the most awful of crimes.

Edited by Kermit8 (07 Mar 2015 9.39am)

That's nonsense. You pick at a few cases and represent it as, 'the authorities'.....I very much doubt that 'the authorities' contain people within them who support the rape or abuse of children.

Large institutions by there very nature inflexible, slow moving and incompetent.

The reality is that you don't know what has happened in any one particular case and are just jumping onto the usual bandwangon as a generalism.

Where there is genuine evidence of a crime then it should be investigated......That is how the law works.....It doesn't work in hindsight.

These are complex situations that require common sense applied to them.....Unfortunately that's in short supply.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 07 Mar 15 11.30am
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Mar 2015 11.04am Quote Kermit8 at 07 Mar 2015 9.39am As the authorities did with the awful stories told by the raped and abused youngsters over the decades. The lethargy they showed made them complicit in the most awful of crimes. Edited by Kermit8 (07 Mar 2015 9.39am) That's nonsense. You pick at a few cases and represent it as, 'the authorities'.....I very much doubt that 'the authorities' contain people within them who support the rape or abuse of children. Large institutions by there very nature inflexible, slow moving and incompetent. The reality is that you don't know what has happened in any one particular case and are just jumping onto the usual bandwangon as a generalism. Where there is genuine evidence of a crime then it should be investigated......That is how the law works.....It doesn't work in hindsight. These are complex situations that require common sense applied to them.....Unfortunately that's in short supply. So why were things seemingly suppressed by those in authority?
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 07 Mar 15 11.30am

Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Mar 2015 11.04am

Quote Kermit8 at 07 Mar 2015 9.39am

As the authorities did with the awful stories told by the raped and abused youngsters over the decades.

The lethargy they showed made them complicit in the most awful of crimes.

Edited by Kermit8 (07 Mar 2015 9.39am)

That's nonsense. You pick at a few cases and represent it as, 'the authorities'.....I very much doubt that 'the authorities' contain people within them who support the rape or abuse of children.

Large institutions by there very nature inflexible, slow moving and incompetent.

The reality is that you don't know what has happened in any one particular case and are just jumping onto the usual bandwangon as a generalism.

Where there is genuine evidence of a crime then it should be investigated......That is how the law works.....It doesn't work in hindsight.

These are complex situations that require common sense applied to them.....Unfortunately that's in short supply.

So why were things seemingly suppressed by those in authority?

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Mar 15 11.55am
Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 11.30am So why were things seemingly suppressed by those in authority? Yeah....I mean....why would people object to crap being publicised about them....Can't think why that would be. Why don't I just print some crap in the paper about you Nick and see how you like it. Also, is there actual evidence of suppression.....Who was stopped from doing what by whom? If evidence exists for abuse by an individual....then you have your local police station for your convenience.....Otherwise you're just an over the fence finger pointer. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Mar 2015 11.57am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Mar 15 11.55am

Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 11.30am

So why were things seemingly suppressed by those in authority?

Yeah....I mean....why would people object to crap being publicised about them....Can't think why that would be.

Why don't I just print some crap in the paper about you Nick and see how you like it.

Also, is there actual evidence of suppression.....Who was stopped from doing what by whom?

If evidence exists for abuse by an individual....then you have your local police station for your convenience.....Otherwise you're just an over the fence finger pointer.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Mar 2015 11.57am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 07 Mar 15 12.03pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Mar 2015 11.55am Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 11.30am So why were things seemingly suppressed by those in authority? Yeah....I mean....why would people object to crap being publicised about them....Can't think why that would be. Why don't I just print some crap in the paper about you Nick and see how you like it. Also, is there actual evidence of suppression.....Who was stopped from doing what by whom? If evidence exists for abuse by an individual....then you have your local police station for your convenience.....Otherwise you're just an over the fence finger pointer. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Mar 2015 11.57am) Did you read the earlier link? Have you read the reports in the press about files disappearing somewhat conveniently? I think evidence is adding up. You it would seem don't. Why?
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 07 Mar 15 12.03pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 07 Mar 2015 11.55am

Quote nickgusset at 07 Mar 2015 11.30am

So why were things seemingly suppressed by those in authority?

Yeah....I mean....why would people object to crap being publicised about them....Can't think why that would be.

Why don't I just print some crap in the paper about you Nick and see how you like it.

Also, is there actual evidence of suppression.....Who was stopped from doing what by whom?

If evidence exists for abuse by an individual....then you have your local police station for your convenience.....Otherwise you're just an over the fence finger pointer.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Mar 2015 11.57am)

Did you read the earlier link? Have you read the reports in the press about files disappearing somewhat conveniently? I think evidence is adding up. You it would seem don't. Why?

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 07 Mar 15 12.38pm
Politically,I "hated" Thatcher.But I had a friend who worked as a civil servant in No 10 at the time who said she was a very decent and considerate person to work for on a one to one basis ,compared to many other politicians. Could such a person endorse a cover up about a matter which could devastate their party,for political reasons? IMO entirely possible,just as with other prime ministers and other "cover ups" in the 20th century. Our libel laws are such that they are weighted in favour of the "accused" as opposed to freedom of expression.So the fact things may begin to come out after people are dead does not necessarily reflect any inherent weakness in the truth underlying the allegations. Edited by legaleagle (07 Mar 2015 12.39pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

07 Mar 15 12.38pm

Politically,I "hated" Thatcher.But I had a friend who worked as a civil servant in No 10 at the time who said she was a very decent and considerate person to work for on a one to one basis ,compared to many other politicians.

Could such a person endorse a cover up about a matter which could devastate their party,for political reasons? IMO entirely possible,just as with other prime ministers and other "cover ups" in the 20th century.

Our libel laws are such that they are weighted in favour of the "accused" as opposed to freedom of expression.So the fact things may begin to come out after people are dead does not necessarily reflect any inherent weakness in the truth underlying the allegations.

Edited by legaleagle (07 Mar 2015 12.39pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 5 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Thatcher and Saville

Site Map

Sponsors