You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tube strike
April 18 2024 8.32pm

Tube strike

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Last >>

 

View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 10 Feb 15 4.18pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 10 Feb 15 4.30pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.18pm

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

Checked this and confirmed that some kinds of diabetes can produce false positive results on breath tests. This doesn't prove he wasn't drunk, but it explains the trade unions have an argument.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 10 Feb 15 4.32pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.30pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.18pm

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

Checked this and confirmed that some kinds of diabetes can produce false positive results on breath tests. This doesn't prove he wasn't drunk, but it explains the trade unions have an argument.

Not on that machine, and he failed it twice.

The transport authority said it had explored in detail the suggestion that diabetes could affect the breathalyser result, but concluded that the type of test it used was not affected by acetone, which is produced in the bloodstream of people with the condition.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 10 Feb 15 4.37pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.32pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.30pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.18pm

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

Checked this and confirmed that some kinds of diabetes can produce false positive results on breath tests. This doesn't prove he wasn't drunk, but it explains the trade unions have an argument.

Not on that machine, and he failed it twice.

The transport authority said it had explored in detail the suggestion that diabetes could affect the breathalyser result, but concluded that the type of test it used was not affected by acetone, which is produced in the bloodstream of people with the condition.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 10 Feb 15 4.40pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.37pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.32pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.30pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.18pm

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

Checked this and confirmed that some kinds of diabetes can produce false positive results on breath tests. This doesn't prove he wasn't drunk, but it explains the trade unions have an argument.

Not on that machine, and he failed it twice.

The transport authority said it had explored in detail the suggestion that diabetes could affect the breathalyser result, but concluded that the type of test it used was not affected by acetone, which is produced in the bloodstream of people with the condition.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.


It's not a opinion, it's a conclusion.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pussay Patrol Flag 10 Feb 15 4.43pm

I hope people take this sort of archaic Union practice into account when they talk about renationalising the railways.

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 10 Feb 15 4.44pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.40pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.37pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.32pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.30pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.18pm

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

Checked this and confirmed that some kinds of diabetes can produce false positive results on breath tests. This doesn't prove he wasn't drunk, but it explains the trade unions have an argument.

Not on that machine, and he failed it twice.

The transport authority said it had explored in detail the suggestion that diabetes could affect the breathalyser result, but concluded that the type of test it used was not affected by acetone, which is produced in the bloodstream of people with the condition.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.


It's not a opinion, it's a conclusion.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities subjective opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 10 Feb 15 4.46pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Here's an objective view then. The underground system is completely emasculated by a mixture of poor management and extraordinarily dated Union philosophy. I object strongly to the no compulsory redundancies concept resulting in people sitting in their gardens for years.

The Union activists would fight their own shadows. They have a ridiculously cushy life and won't let it go easily. Every chance they get to milk the situation they do so with no feeling of guilt. And they like to make sure management know how powerful they are by calling action on a regular basis, using spurious logics in their - perfectly rational and perfectly selfish - power games.

We all suffer from this monopoly. If this were a market economy instead of a closed shop it would look so very different.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 10 Feb 15 4.49pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Mapletree at 10 Feb 2015 4.46pm

Here's an objective view then. The underground system is completely emasculated by a mixture of poor management and extraordinarily dated Union philosophy. I object strongly to the no compulsory redundancies concept resulting in people sitting in their gardens for years.

The Union activists would fight their own shadows. They have a ridiculously cushy life and won't let it go easily. Every chance they get to milk the situation they do so with no feeling of guilt. And they like to make sure management know how powerful they are by calling action on a regular basis, using spurious logics in their - perfectly rational and perfectly selfish - power games.

We all suffer from this monopoly. If this were a market economy instead of a closed shop it would look so very different.

So, your objective view is that you don't like the union. Thanks for the update fella.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 10 Feb 15 4.50pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.44pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.40pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.37pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.32pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.30pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.18pm

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

Checked this and confirmed that some kinds of diabetes can produce false positive results on breath tests. This doesn't prove he wasn't drunk, but it explains the trade unions have an argument.

Not on that machine, and he failed it twice.

The transport authority said it had explored in detail the suggestion that diabetes could affect the breathalyser result, but concluded that the type of test it used was not affected by acetone, which is produced in the bloodstream of people with the condition.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.


It's not a opinion, it's a conclusion.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities subjective opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.

They saw the "excuse" coming. Next time they should just shop them to the police and haul them off for a blood test and bit of downtime.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 10 Feb 15 4.52pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.50pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.44pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.40pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.37pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.32pm

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.30pm

Quote Stuk at 10 Feb 2015 4.18pm

[Link]

"I'm not over the limit, it's my diabetes."

It's bad enough the RMT defend those who fail breath tests, but to vote for strike action over it (again) is absurd.

Checked this and confirmed that some kinds of diabetes can produce false positive results on breath tests. This doesn't prove he wasn't drunk, but it explains the trade unions have an argument.

Not on that machine, and he failed it twice.

The transport authority said it had explored in detail the suggestion that diabetes could affect the breathalyser result, but concluded that the type of test it used was not affected by acetone, which is produced in the bloodstream of people with the condition.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.


It's not a opinion, it's a conclusion.

Thanks for printing the transport authorities subjective opinion, but i was talking about an objective view.

They saw the "excuse" coming. Next time they should just shop them to the police and haul them off for a blood test and bit of downtime.

Shome mishtake surelly?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 10 Feb 15 4.53pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 10 Feb 2015 4.49pm

Quote Mapletree at 10 Feb 2015 4.46pm

Here's an objective view then. The underground system is completely emasculated by a mixture of poor management and extraordinarily dated Union philosophy. I object strongly to the no compulsory redundancies concept resulting in people sitting in their gardens for years.

The Union activists would fight their own shadows. They have a ridiculously cushy life and won't let it go easily. Every chance they get to milk the situation they do so with no feeling of guilt. And they like to make sure management know how powerful they are by calling action on a regular basis, using spurious logics in their - perfectly rational and perfectly selfish - power games.

We all suffer from this monopoly. If this were a market economy instead of a closed shop it would look so very different.

So, your objective view is that you don't like the union. Thanks for the update fella.


Funnily enough I didn't say that. It's a very good Union for its members. But I don't think it makes sense for customers to condone closed-shops.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tube strike