You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Mayweather v Pacquiao - Confirmed
April 19 2024 4.42pm

Mayweather v Pacquiao - Confirmed

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 10 of 13 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

 

View JL85's Profile JL85 Flag London,SE9 09 May 15 12.58am Send a Private Message to JL85 Add JL85 as a friend

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Brentmiester_General Flag Front line in the battle against t... 09 May 15 1.21am

The guy is still a legend in my eyes, more so for how he conducts himself outside of the ring.

Edited by Brentmiester_General (09 May 2015 1.22am)

 


"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
TheJudge Flag 10 May 15 11.40pm

.

Edited by TheJudge (10 May 2015 11.40pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
TheJudge Flag 10 May 15 11.41pm

Quote JL85 at 09 May 2015 12.58am

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)


So you are suggesting Pacquiao took steroids ?

And you think that is unusual among sportsmen ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 11 May 15 7.59am


Although this fight did huge business, it's amazing how many of these super fights are an anti climax. I get that Mayweather is technically very good, but I loved the old ITV days of Ben, Eubank and Collins.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View JL85's Profile JL85 Flag London,SE9 11 May 15 8.30am Send a Private Message to JL85 Add JL85 as a friend

Quote TheJudge at 10 May 2015 11.41pm

Quote JL85 at 09 May 2015 12.58am

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)


So you are suggesting Pacquiao took steroids ?

And you think that is unusual among sportsmen ?

I'm suggesting it's a possibility. And no, i don't think it's unusual. What i think is unusual is how often it's suggested Mayweather dodged Pacquiao but no the other way, considering the facts.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View JL85's Profile JL85 Flag London,SE9 11 May 15 8.32am Send a Private Message to JL85 Add JL85 as a friend

Quote imbored at 11 May 2015 7.59am


Although this fight did huge business, it's amazing how many of these super fights are an anti climax. I get that Mayweather is technically very good, but I loved the old ITV days of Ben, Eubank and Collins.


I agree with you. Spen the better part of the build up to the fight watching Hagler/Hearns/Robinson/Duran fights.

They were epic.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheJudge Flag 11 May 15 10.01am

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 8.30am

Quote TheJudge at 10 May 2015 11.41pm

Quote JL85 at 09 May 2015 12.58am

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)


So you are suggesting Pacquiao took steroids ?

And you think that is unusual among sportsmen ?

I'm suggesting it's a possibility. And no, i don't think it's unusual. What i think is unusual is how often it's suggested Mayweather dodged Pacquiao but no the other way, considering the facts.


Well why would Pacquiao avoid Mayweather ? Surely it was in his interests to fight him but not necessarily the other way around.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View JL85's Profile JL85 Flag London,SE9 11 May 15 10.58am Send a Private Message to JL85 Add JL85 as a friend

Quote TheJudge at 11 May 2015 10.01am

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 8.30am

Quote TheJudge at 10 May 2015 11.41pm

Quote JL85 at 09 May 2015 12.58am

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)


So you are suggesting Pacquiao took steroids ?

And you think that is unusual among sportsmen ?

I'm suggesting it's a possibility. And no, i don't think it's unusual. What i think is unusual is how often it's suggested Mayweather dodged Pacquiao but no the other way, considering the facts.


Well why would Pacquiao avoid Mayweather ? Surely it was in his interests to fight him but not necessarily the other way around.

He may have had no choice but to avoid him due to the PED's he may have been taking.It's important to remember that Mayweather originally agreed to the fight with the stipulation that random blood testing was carried out.

It was Pacquiao who wouldn't agree to that and thus "dodged" the fight.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheJudge Flag 11 May 15 12.26pm

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 10.58am

Quote TheJudge at 11 May 2015 10.01am

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 8.30am

Quote TheJudge at 10 May 2015 11.41pm

Quote JL85 at 09 May 2015 12.58am

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)


So you are suggesting Pacquiao took steroids ?

And you think that is unusual among sportsmen ?

I'm suggesting it's a possibility. And no, i don't think it's unusual. What i think is unusual is how often it's suggested Mayweather dodged Pacquiao but no the other way, considering the facts.


Well why would Pacquiao avoid Mayweather ? Surely it was in his interests to fight him but not necessarily the other way around.

He may have had no choice but to avoid him due to the PED's he may have been taking.It's important to remember that Mayweather originally agreed to the fight with the stipulation that random blood testing was carried out.

It was Pacquiao who wouldn't agree to that and thus "dodged" the fight.

Pacquiao might have refused the conditions but Mayweather would have know that he had no choice.
If he really wanted the fight he would not have insisted on any conditions.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View JL85's Profile JL85 Flag London,SE9 11 May 15 1.35pm Send a Private Message to JL85 Add JL85 as a friend

Quote TheJudge at 11 May 2015 12.26pm

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 10.58am

Quote TheJudge at 11 May 2015 10.01am

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 8.30am

Quote TheJudge at 10 May 2015 11.41pm

Quote JL85 at 09 May 2015 12.58am

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)


So you are suggesting Pacquiao took steroids ?

And you think that is unusual among sportsmen ?

I'm suggesting it's a possibility. And no, i don't think it's unusual. What i think is unusual is how often it's suggested Mayweather dodged Pacquiao but no the other way, considering the facts.


Well why would Pacquiao avoid Mayweather ? Surely it was in his interests to fight him but not necessarily the other way around.

He may have had no choice but to avoid him due to the PED's he may have been taking.It's important to remember that Mayweather originally agreed to the fight with the stipulation that random blood testing was carried out.

It was Pacquiao who wouldn't agree to that and thus "dodged" the fight.

Pacquiao might have refused the conditions but Mayweather would have know that he had no choice.
If he really wanted the fight he would not have insisted on any conditions.

Which suggests he knew something we didn't.

It's not exactly an unreasonable demand. Many have agreed since, including Pacqiuao. Had he agreed then, the fight would have gone ahead.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheJudge Flag 11 May 15 8.31pm

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 1.35pm

Quote TheJudge at 11 May 2015 12.26pm

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 10.58am

Quote TheJudge at 11 May 2015 10.01am

Quote JL85 at 11 May 2015 8.30am

Quote TheJudge at 10 May 2015 11.41pm

Quote JL85 at 09 May 2015 12.58am

Quote Brentmiester_General at 09 May 2015 12.52am

Mayweather has dodged PacMan for years. There's no doubt about that. He's watched his light fade and then agreed to fight him. Wouldn't expect anything less from Mayweather. 5 years ago PacMan was putting on some of the most impressive diaplays in the ring that I have witnessed in my 35 years. To say that Maywether would still have beaten him when Manny was in his prime is just wrong. There's no telling now which way it would have gone though but I think, over the course of a few fights(which is what we should have had) the decisions would have been shared.
Ultimately Maywether has robbed us of what could have been some of the most thrilling boxing bouts in the sports history. This, as well as the woman bashing is why I will never respect him.


Disagree, think the gap would have been wider.

One has to question Pacquiao's reluctance to take a blood test coinciding with his quite incredible rise through the weight classess whilst seemingly increasing his explosive punching power which was then followed by a huuuuuuuge decline in speed and power when drug testing was suggested and rejected.

5 years down the line and miraculously, Pacquiao can now handle a blood test that would normally "significantly weaken" him.

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)

Edited by JL85 (09 May 2015 12.59am)


So you are suggesting Pacquiao took steroids ?

And you think that is unusual among sportsmen ?

I'm suggesting it's a possibility. And no, i don't think it's unusual. What i think is unusual is how often it's suggested Mayweather dodged Pacquiao but no the other way, considering the facts.


Well why would Pacquiao avoid Mayweather ? Surely it was in his interests to fight him but not necessarily the other way around.

He may have had no choice but to avoid him due to the PED's he may have been taking.It's important to remember that Mayweather originally agreed to the fight with the stipulation that random blood testing was carried out.

It was Pacquiao who wouldn't agree to that and thus "dodged" the fight.

Pacquiao might have refused the conditions but Mayweather would have know that he had no choice.
If he really wanted the fight he would not have insisted on any conditions.

Which suggests he knew something we didn't.

It's not exactly an unreasonable demand. Many have agreed since, including Pacqiuao. Had he agreed then, the fight would have gone ahead.


But if Mayweather did know that Paquiao was on the gear, then he would also know that he couldn't submit to blood testing. Therefore Mayweather cleverly avoided the fight.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 10 of 13 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Mayweather v Pacquiao - Confirmed