You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Clarkson
April 25 2024 10.41pm

Jeremy Clarkson

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 25 of 28 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 >

 

imbored Flag UK 26 Mar 15 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.


Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 26 Mar 15 4.28pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote TUX at 26 Mar 2015 4.06pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

And there's me thinking they are critically understaffed


Not when it comes to celebrities and sporting events. "we'll have some of that!"

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 26 Mar 15 4.33pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)


There were two people. You seem to be acting as an eye-witness when you know as much as the rest of us.

You can be as nice a pie, and still have a row with someone or wind them up to breaking point.

If he'd attacked a stranger he wouldn't have even got an investigation, and the police would certainly be even more involved. Whether requested or not.

Edited by Stuk (26 Mar 2015 4.34pm)

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 26 Mar 15 4.43pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.33pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)


There were two people. You seem to be acting as an eye-witness when you know as much as the rest of us.

You can be as nice a pie, and still have a row with someone or wind them up to breaking point.

If he'd attacked a stranger he wouldn't have even got an investigation, and the police would certainly be even more involved. Whether requested or not.

Edited by Stuk (26 Mar 2015 4.34pm)


There were several eye witnesses, so we know what they know. Everyone involved was interviewed so we know what they said too. You're right, I only know what is known. Clarkson doesn't deny that it was an unprovoked one way attack.

If you attack a stranger and it becomes known about they will investigate it. If you attack your mate and the police find out about it, it will be investigated. With the amount of witnesses and prolonged nature of this row, then assault, it was absolutely always going to get out anyway, hence investigated by either the BBC or the police. Clarkson should've known this, there's no excuse.

We should be sorry for the guy who got attacked above all else. Verbally abused and threatened with the sack, then assaulted and later receives countless death threats online and has his reputation damaged through no fault of his own.


Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.44pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View TUX's Profile TUX Flag redhill 26 Mar 15 4.58pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.43pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.33pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)


There were two people. You seem to be acting as an eye-witness when you know as much as the rest of us.

You can be as nice a pie, and still have a row with someone or wind them up to breaking point.

If he'd attacked a stranger he wouldn't have even got an investigation, and the police would certainly be even more involved. Whether requested or not.

Edited by Stuk (26 Mar 2015 4.34pm)


There were several eye witnesses, so we know what they know. Everyone involved was interviewed so we know what they said too. You're right, I only know what is known. Clarkson doesn't deny that it was an unprovoked one way attack.

If you attack a stranger and it becomes known about they will investigate it. If you attack your mate and the police find out about it, it will be investigated. With the amount of witnesses and prolonged nature of this row, then assault, it was absolutely always going to get out anyway, hence investigated by either the BBC or the police. Clarkson should've known this, there's no excuse.

We should be sorry for the guy who got attacked above all else. Verbally abused and threatened with the sack, then assaulted and later receives countless death threats online and has his reputation damaged through no fault of his own.


Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.44pm)

He arranged a cold meat platter for dinner. Who does that!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 26 Mar 15 5.05pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.43pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.33pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)


There were two people. You seem to be acting as an eye-witness when you know as much as the rest of us.

You can be as nice a pie, and still have a row with someone or wind them up to breaking point.

If he'd attacked a stranger he wouldn't have even got an investigation, and the police would certainly be even more involved. Whether requested or not.

Edited by Stuk (26 Mar 2015 4.34pm)


There were several eye witnesses, so we know what they know. Everyone involved was interviewed so we know what they said too. You're right, I only know what is known. Clarkson doesn't deny that it was an unprovoked one way attack.

If you attack a stranger and it becomes known about they will investigate it. If you attack your mate and the police find out about it, it will be investigated. With the amount of witnesses and prolonged nature of this row, then assault, it was absolutely always going to get out anyway, hence investigated by either the BBC or the police. Clarkson should've known this, there's no excuse.

We should be sorry for the guy who got attacked above all else. Verbally abused and threatened with the sack, then assaulted and later receives countless death threats online and has his reputation damaged through no fault of his own.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.44pm)

Two people can have a row, while only one is abusive. You can keep calling it an attack or an assault all you like if you really feel the need to. Tymon has called it "a regrettable incident" and not used hyperbole.

The police should investigate complaints to them, not any old incident if neither party want them to and one they've only heard of through the media.

The people abusing him are out of order. They're not privvy to what happened either and it won't change a thing.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 26 Mar 15 5.23pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 5.05pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.43pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.33pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)


There were two people. You seem to be acting as an eye-witness when you know as much as the rest of us.

You can be as nice a pie, and still have a row with someone or wind them up to breaking point.

If he'd attacked a stranger he wouldn't have even got an investigation, and the police would certainly be even more involved. Whether requested or not.

Edited by Stuk (26 Mar 2015 4.34pm)


There were several eye witnesses, so we know what they know. Everyone involved was interviewed so we know what they said too. You're right, I only know what is known. Clarkson doesn't deny that it was an unprovoked one way attack.

If you attack a stranger and it becomes known about they will investigate it. If you attack your mate and the police find out about it, it will be investigated. With the amount of witnesses and prolonged nature of this row, then assault, it was absolutely always going to get out anyway, hence investigated by either the BBC or the police. Clarkson should've known this, there's no excuse.

We should be sorry for the guy who got attacked above all else. Verbally abused and threatened with the sack, then assaulted and later receives countless death threats online and has his reputation damaged through no fault of his own.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.44pm)

Two people can have a row, while only one is abusive. You can keep calling it an attack or an assault all you like if you really feel the need to. Tymon has called it "a regrettable incident" and not used hyperbole.

The police should investigate complaints to them, not any old incident if neither party want them to and one they've only heard of through the media.

The people abusing him are out of order. They're not privvy to what happened either and it won't change a thing.

I'm calling it an attack or assault because that's clearly what it was.

I definitely agree with your police comment, but it comes back to the easy pickings point. The police love investigating stuff like this. It's high profile and nice and safe for them.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 26 Mar 15 5.52pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 5.23pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 5.05pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.43pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.33pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)


There were two people. You seem to be acting as an eye-witness when you know as much as the rest of us.

You can be as nice a pie, and still have a row with someone or wind them up to breaking point.

If he'd attacked a stranger he wouldn't have even got an investigation, and the police would certainly be even more involved. Whether requested or not.

Edited by Stuk (26 Mar 2015 4.34pm)


There were several eye witnesses, so we know what they know. Everyone involved was interviewed so we know what they said too. You're right, I only know what is known. Clarkson doesn't deny that it was an unprovoked one way attack.

If you attack a stranger and it becomes known about they will investigate it. If you attack your mate and the police find out about it, it will be investigated. With the amount of witnesses and prolonged nature of this row, then assault, it was absolutely always going to get out anyway, hence investigated by either the BBC or the police. Clarkson should've known this, there's no excuse.

We should be sorry for the guy who got attacked above all else. Verbally abused and threatened with the sack, then assaulted and later receives countless death threats online and has his reputation damaged through no fault of his own.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.44pm)

Two people can have a row, while only one is abusive. You can keep calling it an attack or an assault all you like if you really feel the need to. Tymon has called it "a regrettable incident" and not used hyperbole.

The police should investigate complaints to them, not any old incident if neither party want them to and one they've only heard of through the media.

The people abusing him are out of order. They're not privvy to what happened either and it won't change a thing.

I'm calling it an attack or assault because that's clearly what it was.

I definitely agree with your police comment, but it comes back to the easy pickings point. The police love investigating stuff like this. It's high profile and nice and safe for them.


You're beginning to sound like the type of person who would go to A&E about a fat lip. Not even the victim is calling it that.

Incident, spat, row, fracas. Many options have been made available, by those who were actually there.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 26 Mar 15 6.08pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 5.52pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 5.23pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 5.05pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.43pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.33pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 4.17pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 4.00pm

Quote imbored at 26 Mar 2015 3.50pm

Quote Stuk at 26 Mar 2015 1.46pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 12.54pm

My opinion is that its all going to plan nicely for Clarkson.

But the producer who went to A and E for a fat lip, ???? what a massive wet pussey hole.

I had a black eye once of my little girl when she was a baby butted me by accident, did I go to A and E did I fcuk as like.

Honestly men today are turning into Women.


Evidence isn't it though? Probably didn't think Clarkson would own up.

What is equally pathetic is the police saying they want to look at it. If two grown men have a row or a fight and neither complain to the police, just keep out of it.

Saying this is 'two men having a fight' isn't accurate though. One men was verbally abused and threatened for 30 minutes without retaliating, then physically attacked for 30 seconds until stopped by others, again without retaliating. It's more akin to attacking someone in the street then saying the police shouldn't get involved.

For what it's worth the guy didn't and hasn't complained to the police anyway.

I said "a row or a fight". It's nothing like attacking someone in the street when the two involved know each other, worked all day with each other etc.

I know he didn't complain, the police have taken it upon themselves to stick their noses in. That's the most pathetic part of all. "Police investigate non-complaint".

It takes two people to have a fight or row. One man was verbally then physically assaulted without reply. If you know someone and they physically attack you for what is a ridiculous reason, it's really no better than attacking a stranger anyway. Actually, if he'd attacked a stranger instead of a workmate he might still have his job, which is kind of funny to think about.

It's no surprise either that the police like easy pickings. They far prefer arresting over something stupid on twitter for instance than dealing with serious crimes. It's all about ticking boxes and league tables unfortunately.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.21pm)


There were two people. You seem to be acting as an eye-witness when you know as much as the rest of us.

You can be as nice a pie, and still have a row with someone or wind them up to breaking point.

If he'd attacked a stranger he wouldn't have even got an investigation, and the police would certainly be even more involved. Whether requested or not.

Edited by Stuk (26 Mar 2015 4.34pm)


There were several eye witnesses, so we know what they know. Everyone involved was interviewed so we know what they said too. You're right, I only know what is known. Clarkson doesn't deny that it was an unprovoked one way attack.

If you attack a stranger and it becomes known about they will investigate it. If you attack your mate and the police find out about it, it will be investigated. With the amount of witnesses and prolonged nature of this row, then assault, it was absolutely always going to get out anyway, hence investigated by either the BBC or the police. Clarkson should've known this, there's no excuse.

We should be sorry for the guy who got attacked above all else. Verbally abused and threatened with the sack, then assaulted and later receives countless death threats online and has his reputation damaged through no fault of his own.

Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 4.44pm)

Two people can have a row, while only one is abusive. You can keep calling it an attack or an assault all you like if you really feel the need to. Tymon has called it "a regrettable incident" and not used hyperbole.

The police should investigate complaints to them, not any old incident if neither party want them to and one they've only heard of through the media.

The people abusing him are out of order. They're not privvy to what happened either and it won't change a thing.

I'm calling it an attack or assault because that's clearly what it was.

I definitely agree with your police comment, but it comes back to the easy pickings point. The police love investigating stuff like this. It's high profile and nice and safe for them.


You're beginning to sound like the type of person who would go to A&E about a fat lip. Not even the victim is calling it that.

Incident, spat, row, fracas. Many options have been made available, by those who were actually there.


At least you acknowledge that he was 'the victim'. I've never heard of a 'victim' of a fight or a row, usually only an assault. Victim implies he was attacked, which of course he was.


Edited by imbored (26 Mar 2015 6.23pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 26 Mar 15 6.57pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 26 Mar 2015 3.28pm

Quote The Sash at 26 Mar 2015 3.15pm

Quote ghosteagle at 26 Mar 2015 3.07pm

Quote dannyh at 26 Mar 2015 2.59pm

But that’s the point I'm making, evidence of what he got a fat lip.

I'm no CSI, but I bet when Clarkson ripped into him, I bet he didn’t just stand there and take it, otherwise why would he have hit him, any way that’s not what I'm talking about.

I'm talking about that pussy's need for evidence to show that someone had given him a fat lip, so what you big minge, I get worse playing rugby. Honestly for me to tip up at A & E I would have to be dragged there half dead, turning up because you've got a hurty lip is beyond gay.

It's embarrassing.

Watch the BBC employ a women, whose a one Parent family , but in an unofficial same sex relationship with a Muslim from Africa, whose slightly deaf. That’s all their boxes ticked.

Whole thing is pathetic on two fronts, one if engineered by Clarkson the BBC are complete idiots for falling for it. Two, if it wasn’t it is a complete and utter over reaction that is a reflection of the soft arse rules we know seem to adhere to, and the “someone has to be at fault” mentality. Why couldn’t it be two blokes had a square up at work and be left at that, happens all the time at my place.

It's all that Nick Gussets fault

A rare sighting indeed, the now near extinct 'macho male'. Take a screen-shot, it could be your last chance....

Not really.

Hurty lip - go to hospital ???? I bet A&E where delighted to see him so they could waste their time in kissing it better.

Clarkson didn't beat him within an inch of his life or leave him a pile of his own teeth and faeces - he gave him a right hander, which I would imagine, seeing Clarkson doesn't strike me as being the next Heavyweight Champion of the World probably wasn't a full on Tyson-esque left hook.

Even Piers Morgan thought it too w@nky to go to hospital after Clarkson connected with him - so to be more w@nky and wet than Piers Morgan takes some doing....

Er, i wasn't referring to the Clarkson incident. Rather, i found the posters 'macho' posturing (i get worse when i play rugby, i would have to be half dead to go to A & E, happens all the time in my place etc) amusing. Still, thanks for taking part.

Macho Posturing ? just because I play rugby and avoid hospitals like the plauge, mainly because to behonest I cant be arsed hanging around.

I also consider a fat lip to be in the same league as having a splinter, and I wouldnt go to A and E for that either, maybe you would.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View eaglesdare's Profile eaglesdare Flag 26 Mar 15 7.33pm Send a Private Message to eaglesdare Add eaglesdare as a friend

Plot twist! It was the same producer who leaked the footage of clarkson saying the N word.

Wouldn't be surprised if I'm honest tho

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 26 Mar 15 7.44pm

Quote eaglesdare at 26 Mar 2015 7.33pm

Plot twist! It was the same producer who leaked the footage of clarkson saying the N word.

Wouldn't be surprised if I'm honest tho


The attempts in this thread to dream up new ways to apply blame to this guy is beyond belief.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 25 of 28 < 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Jeremy Clarkson