Charlie Austin (papertalk)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 black eagle.  south croydon. 16 Jan 16 12.57pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Southampton have the Bargain off the this transfer window. Nuff said.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
MPE  Maidstone 16 Jan 16 1.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The saga finally ends.
Just when I thought that I was out...........they pull me back in |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Petereagle Brockley 16 Jan 16 1.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote MPE at 16 Jan 2016 1.19pm
The saga finally ends.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| slubglurge welling 16 Jan 16 1.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
He's from Poole. Location big factor. Agent probably gave Saints a nudge
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| palacetilidie1905 16 Jan 16 2.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Anyone thought that maybe we did go in for him but he decided on Southampton instead?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| sydtheeagle England 16 Jan 16 2.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Thank goodness that's done. At least it'll end the throng of HOL posters who understand little to nothing about the economics of football telling us a). Austin will never move in January because he's so greedy, and b). QPR won't sell for less than 15 million quid. As I wrote in this thread over two weeks ago... Quote sydtheeagle at 04 Jan 2016 10.36am
Bottom line is that Austin will almost certainly move in January. ...Yes, everyone may publicly demand this and that when it comes to money and fees but these things get resolved. This was always going to happen. It's not remotely surprising that it has.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  16 Jan 16 8.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote palacetilidie1905 at 16 Jan 2016 2.15pm
Anyone thought that maybe we did go in for him but he decided on Southampton instead? I'm under the impression that AP thought he was sh!te and that even if he didn't he wasn't going to be seen to agree with Colin.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stanzerman Hastings 16 Jan 16 10.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Absolutely no way we would have gone in for him -
Stanzerman |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stanzerman Hastings 16 Jan 16 10.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Willo at 16 Jan 2016 12.49pm
Quote Jacey at 16 Jan 2016 12.37pm
£4m??
No maybe about it, the £4m is just QPRs cut. The player's signing on fee would be more like £7m to £8m bearing in mind if he'd waited till summer he could have pocketed the whole transfer fee.
Stanzerman |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jason7 croydon 17 Jan 16 12.02am |
|
|---|---|
|
He is a huge problem player, why do you think nobody snapped him up before.southampton has taken a risk on him, not because of his ability but because they needed a forward.wether he sorts himself out will be seen, but his a liability, and being back in his comfort zone stop him doing stupid things. Having said that would had loved him .
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Zebedee Surrey 17 Jan 16 9.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Apparently 4m was the cut price after Southampton waved the Caulker call back fee!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Booted Eagle Bristol 17 Jan 16 10.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jason7 at 17 Jan 2016 12.02am
He is a huge problem player, why do you think nobody snapped him up before.southampton has taken a risk on him, not because of his ability but because they needed a forward.wether he sorts himself out will be seen, but his a liability, and being back in his comfort zone stop him doing stupid things. Having said that would had loved him . The only liability is his knees and he has had that problem for years. Hull ditched him after a medical, QPR stepped in and reaped the rewards. No reason why this could not happen again. No doubt salary would be high but the length of contract might of also been a factor, then again he is 26 years old so 4.5 years make sense. Can see the up sides and the down on this player.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.