Diversity Schmeristy
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
jamiemartin721  Reading 27 Apr 15 4.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote matt_himself at 27 Apr 2015 2.41pm
This is key to a lot of what I say. Who decides what is offensive? Most of the stuff decided on here comes from people who live in the back of beyond, those in professions with motives or those who think they know what is best but have hidden themselves away from the real world. The person who claims offence. In terms of law, they then have to show reasonable grounds that it was offensive and towards intent. Typically attempts by state to label offensive have been hilarious failures.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| jamiemartin721 Reading 27 Apr 15 4.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote soulboy at 27 Apr 2015 3.03pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Apr 2015 12.54pm
Quote PalazioVecchio at 27 Apr 2015 12.30pm
don't you love 'positive discrimination' ie. a white bloke doesn't get a job he is well qualified for cos he is a white bloke. and you end up sacking Alan Pardew and hiring Harriet Harman to run your football team. Doesn't work quite like that, its if there is an choice between two equally qualified candidates, then the default position of Positive Action is that the other person gets it. Is the wrong answer and is actually 'positive discrimination' and contrary to existing law in this country. Positive Action is lawful but can only be applied BEFORE the selection process takes place e.g offering extra tuition to recognised underepresented (as defined by the existing legislation) groups or actually encouraging said groups to apply for a position. However, at the point of selection, under current legislation, everyone is considered as equal and the most suitably qualified person SHOULD get the post regardless of ethnic persuasion, gender, disability, sexual orientation etc. Thanks for that. Of course, they aren't - and the job typically will go to the white male, because its unconscious bias in society, as opposed to constructed along rational lines. Everyone says they'd select 'the most qualified of all the applicants' that typically isn't the case (because the human mind doesn't work like that). Indeed some people will specifically select the racial minority, through unconscious fear of being labeled racist.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| imbored UK 27 Apr 15 5.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
A stupid idea of course, since people can be victims of racism regardless of their race. Excluding white people is racist, so this is a racist anti-racism event.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 soulboy Lewisham 27 Apr 15 5.14pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Apr 2015 4.20pm
Quote soulboy at 27 Apr 2015 3.03pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Apr 2015 12.54pm
Quote PalazioVecchio at 27 Apr 2015 12.30pm
don't you love 'positive discrimination' ie. a white bloke doesn't get a job he is well qualified for cos he is a white bloke. and you end up sacking Alan Pardew and hiring Harriet Harman to run your football team. Doesn't work quite like that, its if there is an choice between two equally qualified candidates, then the default position of Positive Action is that the other person gets it. Is the wrong answer and is actually 'positive discrimination' and contrary to existing law in this country. Positive Action is lawful but can only be applied BEFORE the selection process takes place e.g offering extra tuition to recognised underepresented (as defined by the existing legislation) groups or actually encouraging said groups to apply for a position. However, at the point of selection, under current legislation, everyone is considered as equal and the most suitably qualified person SHOULD get the post regardless of ethnic persuasion, gender, disability, sexual orientation etc. Thanks for that. Of course, they aren't - and the job typically will go to the white male, because its unconscious bias in society, as opposed to constructed along rational lines. Everyone says they'd select 'the most qualified of all the applicants' that typically isn't the case (because the human mind doesn't work like that). Indeed some people will specifically select the racial minority, through unconscious fear of being labeled racist. Having been a manager/director in the Public Sector for 30+ years would have to agree with your summation, however positive action although laudable in trying to remedy the manifestation of past discrimination remains a hotly debated and contentious area of management. Damned if you do and obviously a racist if you don't.
"Deviance is a freedom enjoyed in a city of lightly engaged strangers" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| johnfirewall 27 Apr 15 8.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The same union refused to hold a Holocaust memorial event with someone bringing up Palestine at the meeting. They've also promoted a boycott of Israeli goods. They love a protest and in fact there's daft home-made banner outside right now. I can only attribute this to having to attend university in New Cross and probably just commuting from a nice home rather than being in a uni town with more focus on sensible passtimes like getting pissed all the time and the occasional bit of work.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 28 Apr 15 11.31am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote johnfirewall at 27 Apr 2015 8.37pm
The same union refused to hold a Holocaust memorial event with someone bringing up Palestine at the meeting. They've also promoted a boycott of Israeli goods. They love a protest and in fact there's daft home-made banner outside right now. I can only attribute this to having to attend university in New Cross and probably just commuting from a nice home rather than being in a uni town with more focus on sensible passtimes like getting pissed all the time and the occasional bit of work. Phd in hooliganism and sister raping
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 28 Apr 15 11.36am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 Apr 2015 11.31am
Quote johnfirewall at 27 Apr 2015 8.37pm
The same union refused to hold a Holocaust memorial event with someone bringing up Palestine at the meeting. They've also promoted a boycott of Israeli goods. They love a protest and in fact there's daft home-made banner outside right now. I can only attribute this to having to attend university in New Cross and probably just commuting from a nice home rather than being in a uni town with more focus on sensible passtimes like getting pissed all the time and the occasional bit of work. Phd in hooliganism and sister raping
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| johnfirewall 11 May 15 11.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Goldsmiths welfare and diversity officer, Bahar Mustafa, hits out at racism accusations, stating ethnic minority women can't be racist or sexist
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
The Sash  Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 12 May 15 8.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote johnfirewall at 11 May 2015 11.07pm
Goldsmiths welfare and diversity officer, Bahar Mustafa, hits out at racism accusations, stating ethnic minority women can't be racist or sexist Bahar Mustafa, as she has already demonstrated in spades is an utter imbecile. Simply reading.... ....demonstrates brilliantly that she sees herself as some kind of victim and wears her race, gender and class on her sleeve like a Scouts Housekeeping badge and that anything and everything negative that effects her daily life is to blame on one or all of them. She's simply a polytechnic revolutionary c*nt I still would though
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 12 May 15 9.06am |
|
|---|---|
|
She has all the personality attributes to be a successful politician a la George Galloway, Nigel Farage, Ed Balls, etc.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 12 May 15 9.51am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote johnfirewall at 11 May 2015 11.07pm
Goldsmiths welfare and diversity officer, Bahar Mustafa, hits out at racism accusations, stating ethnic minority women can't be racist or sexist
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 12 May 15 12.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote dannyh at 12 May 2015 9.51am
Quote johnfirewall at 11 May 2015 11.07pm
Goldsmiths welfare and diversity officer, Bahar Mustafa, hits out at racism accusations, stating ethnic minority women can't be racist or sexist
We had a young guy who's parents were from Jamaica who was going out with a girl who's parents were from Barbados and she gave him merry hell. Firm was too scared to sack her She ended up putting in a grievance of 47 separate instances of alleged racism, sexism etc against the firm of which it took the the tribunal 5 minutes thr tell her to f*** off - she thenleft
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.