You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Look what you've done!
April 23 2024 11.41am

Look what you've done!

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 22 of 28 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 24 Jul 15 2.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Jul 2015 2.10pm

Let me get this right. You think what is contained in the Human Rights act is perfectly ok other than its not British?

Surely then the cases you cited earlier would still have had the same conclusion.

It is as British as it is French, German, Polish, Belgian etc.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 24 Jul 15 2.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 24 Jul 2015 1.57pm

Absolutely - as long as it is a product of the UK parliament and is administered by British courts.

It can't be a product of Parliament, as its a Court of Appeal, as such it has to be formed independently of parliamentary influence and appointments.

It could however probably be administered as part of the court service, provided the Ministry of Justice had no involvement in appointment of Judges to the UK Court.

Which would be a massive waste of money, to achieve the same thing that the ECHR provides. Maybe they could all wear union jack wigs to prove how British they are.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 24 Jul 15 2.58pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 24 Jul 2015 2.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 24 Jul 2015 1.57pm

Absolutely - as long as it is a product of the UK parliament and is administered by British courts.

It can't be a product of Parliament, as its a Court of Appeal, as such it has to be formed independently of parliamentary influence and appointments.

It could however probably be administered as part of the court service, provided the Ministry of Justice had no involvement in appointment of Judges to the UK Court.

Which would be a massive waste of money, to achieve the same thing that the ECHR provides. Maybe they could all wear union jack wigs to prove how British they are.


I know it can't be a product of Parliament as things stand, that is the point! I don't want a foreign appeal court, I want our own. 'Massive waste of money', how very amusing compared to the catastrophic waste of money that is the EU and the ECHR. There would be no need to wear union jack wigs to prove how British they are, it would be self evident as they would be British courts.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 24 Jul 15 3.05pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 24 Jul 2015 2.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 24 Jul 2015 1.57pm

Absolutely - as long as it is a product of the UK parliament and is administered by British courts.

It can't be a product of Parliament, as its a Court of Appeal, as such it has to be formed independently of parliamentary influence and appointments.

It could however probably be administered as part of the court service, provided the Ministry of Justice had no involvement in appointment of Judges to the UK Court.

Which would be a massive waste of money, to achieve the same thing that the ECHR provides. Maybe they could all wear union jack wigs to prove how British they are.



Prehaps they could morris-dance into the courtroom, or possibly be announced by a chrous of bulldogs?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 28 Jul 15 12.51pm

[Link]

'The former Thames Valley chief constable took up her role in April when the NPCC replaced the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo).

She said police budgets had been cut "significantly" - by 25% over four years - and they were expected to be cut further.

"Over 10 years we will have lost about 70,000 posts and I don't think it's possible to carry on doing what we've always done, as we will just fail the public but also cause unacceptable stress among our officers and staff," she said.'

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 28 Jul 15 1.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 28 Jul 2015 12.51pm

[Link]

'The former Thames Valley chief constable took up her role in April when the NPCC replaced the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo).

She said police budgets had been cut "significantly" - by 25% over four years - and they were expected to be cut further.

"Over 10 years we will have lost about 70,000 posts and I don't think it's possible to carry on doing what we've always done, as we will just fail the public but also cause unacceptable stress among our officers and staff," she said.'

Surely you think it a good thing that there are less racist, repressive police?

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View ghosteagle's Profile ghosteagle Flag 28 Jul 15 1.41pm Send a Private Message to ghosteagle Add ghosteagle as a friend

Quote leggedstruggle at 28 Jul 2015 1.35pm

Quote nickgusset at 28 Jul 2015 12.51pm

[Link]

'The former Thames Valley chief constable took up her role in April when the NPCC replaced the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo).

She said police budgets had been cut "significantly" - by 25% over four years - and they were expected to be cut further.

"Over 10 years we will have lost about 70,000 posts and I don't think it's possible to carry on doing what we've always done, as we will just fail the public but also cause unacceptable stress among our officers and staff," she said.'

Surely you think it a good thing that there are less racist, repressive police?


It's always a good thing when there are less racist, repressive people per se. Surely you wouldn't disagree?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 29 Jul 15 8.49pm

[Link]

Like to stigmatise this lot don't they?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 29 Jul 15 9.40pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jul 2015 8.49pm

[Link]

Like to stigmatise this lot don't they?


You will believe anything.

That is priceless.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View johnno42000's Profile johnno42000 Flag 02 Aug 15 4.30pm Send a Private Message to johnno42000 Add johnno42000 as a friend

Terrifying, absolutely terrifying [Link]

 


'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Aug 15 2.49pm

[Link]

Thieving cunds.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 04 Aug 15 3.30pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 04 Aug 2015 2.49pm

[Link]

Thieving cunds.


Probably bought by institutions, pension funds and the like, and only at a small discount.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 22 of 28 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Look what you've done!