Socialism in action

Page 5 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

derben 12 Jun 15 10.41pm
Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.38pm Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.33pm If you re-read my post you would see I would hope that I think the police were OTT in going about their business on that occasion. Doesn't mean I think what she was doing should necessarily be lawful.I explained why this is distinct from a law being OTT per se. Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism.Making monkey noises at an opposition player (like some fans overseas regularly do) would have a lot to do with racism. It is, I would have thought, plainly racist (discriminating negatively on grounds of race)to discriminate against one's neighbours on grounds of race by choosing not to live amongst them based on what race they are.If that's not being a racist,hard to see what could be.Does that mean there should be a law against you moving? No.I think many of the neighbours would be well pleased to see the back of you in such circumstances. If you disagree,so be it.I don't think any amount of rational argument on my part would be likely to persuade you otherwise Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.36pm) Why was the woman racist, she merely told them to go home - just like the football fans told me to. I think the statement I have highlighted in bold is one of the most priceless politically correct pieces of nonsense I have ever read - congratulations. Edited by derben (12 Jun 2015 10.42pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

12 Jun 15 10.41pm

Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.38pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.33pm

If you re-read my post you would see I would hope that I think the police were OTT in going about their business on that occasion. Doesn't mean I think what she was doing should necessarily be lawful.I explained why this is distinct from a law being OTT per se.

Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism.Making monkey noises at an opposition player (like some fans overseas regularly do) would have a lot to do with racism.

It is, I would have thought, plainly racist (discriminating negatively on grounds of race)to discriminate against one's neighbours on grounds of race by choosing not to live amongst them based on what race they are.If that's not being a racist,hard to see what could be.Does that mean there should be a law against you moving? No.I think many of the neighbours would be well pleased to see the back of you in such circumstances.

If you disagree,so be it.I don't think any amount of rational argument on my part would be likely to persuade you otherwise

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.36pm)

Why was the woman racist, she merely told them to go home - just like the football fans told me to.

I think the statement I have highlighted in bold is one of the most priceless politically correct pieces of nonsense I have ever read - congratulations.

Edited by derben (12 Jun 2015 10.42pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 12 Jun 15 10.45pm
I took you at face value. It appears in fact she was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.I believe (I may be wrong) that things like breaching the peace (which I referred to above)are a public order offence.You inflated it to "racism".Some of the press reports refer to a man in the same town being arrested the same day for a racist attack and for having raided a mosque.I said the fact police are OTT in carrying out an arrest doesn't necessarily invalidate a law per se.
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

12 Jun 15 10.45pm

I took you at face value. It appears in fact she was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.I believe (I may be wrong) that things like breaching the peace (which I referred to above)are a public order offence.You inflated it to "racism".Some of the press reports refer to a man in the same town being arrested the same day for a racist attack and for having raided a mosque.I said the fact police are OTT in carrying out an arrest doesn't necessarily invalidate a law per se.

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 12 Jun 15 10.48pm
Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.41pm [ It is, I would have thought, plainly racist (discriminating negatively on grounds of race)to discriminate against one's neighbours on grounds of race by choosing not to live amongst them Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.36pm) I think the statement I have highlighted in bold is one of the most priceless politically correct pieces of nonsense I have ever read - congratulations. .................................................. I'm not surprised; you would. That's what's in my view is so sad as to be tragic.None so sad as those who are in denial.Hold your views,but be big enough to face up to what they are.But,each to their own. Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.50pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

12 Jun 15 10.48pm

Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.41pm

[

It is, I would have thought, plainly racist (discriminating negatively on grounds of race)to discriminate against one's neighbours on grounds of race by choosing not to live amongst them

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.36pm)

I think the statement I have highlighted in bold is one of the most priceless politically correct pieces of nonsense I have ever read - congratulations.

..................................................

I'm not surprised; you would. That's what's in my view is so sad as to be tragic.None so sad as those who are in denial.Hold your views,but be big enough to face up to what they are.But,each to their own.

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.50pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

derben 12 Jun 15 10.50pm
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm I took you at face value. It appears in fact she was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.I believe (I may be wrong) that things like breaching the peace (which I referred to above)are a public order offence.You inflated it to "racism".Some of the press reports refer to a man in the same town being arrested the same day for a racist attack and for having raided a mosque.I said the fact police are OTT in carrying out an arrest doesn't necessarily invalidate a law per se. You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist. If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence? The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case.
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

12 Jun 15 10.50pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm

You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist.

If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence?

The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case.

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 12 Jun 15 10.52pm
Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm I took you at face value. It appears in fact she was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.I believe (I may be wrong) that things like breaching the peace (which I referred to above)are a public order offence.You inflated it to "racism".Some of the press reports refer to a man in the same town being arrested the same day for a racist attack and for having raided a mosque.I said the fact police are OTT in carrying out an arrest doesn't necessarily invalidate a law per se. You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist. If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence? The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case. That's plain bonkers. I know the man was separate to the woman.That's exactly the point I was making. Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.52pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

12 Jun 15 10.52pm

Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm

You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist.

If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence?

The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case.

That's plain bonkers.

I know the man was separate to the woman.That's exactly the point I was making.

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.52pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

derben 12 Jun 15 10.53pm
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.52pm Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm I took you at face value. It appears in fact she was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.I believe (I may be wrong) that things like breaching the peace (which I referred to above)are a public order offence.You inflated it to "racism".Some of the press reports refer to a man in the same town being arrested the same day for a racist attack and for having raided a mosque.I said the fact police are OTT in carrying out an arrest doesn't necessarily invalidate a law per se. You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist. If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence? The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case. That's plain bonkers. I know the man was separate to the woman.That's exactly the point I was making. Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.52pm) Why did you bring the man into it at all is what I'm saying?
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

12 Jun 15 10.53pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.52pm

Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm

You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist.

If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence?

The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case.

That's plain bonkers.

I know the man was separate to the woman.That's exactly the point I was making.

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 10.52pm)

Why did you bring the man into it at all is what I'm saying?

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 12 Jun 15 10.55pm
Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

12 Jun 15 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

derben 12 Jun 15 10.57pm
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. Again, if she was arrested for telling people to go home, why aren't the football fans arrested?
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

12 Jun 15 10.57pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Again, if she was arrested for telling people to go home, why aren't the football fans arrested?

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 12 Jun 15 11.02pm
Technically,they could be.Conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace. (and see where I've added more above) Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.03pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

12 Jun 15 11.02pm

Technically,they could be.Conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.

(and see where I've added more above)

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.03pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 12 Jun 15 11.13pm
Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm I took you at face value. It appears in fact she was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.I believe (I may be wrong) that things like breaching the peace (which I referred to above)are a public order offence.You inflated it to "racism".Some of the press reports refer to a man in the same town being arrested the same day for a racist attack and for having raided a mosque.I said the fact police are OTT in carrying out an arrest doesn't necessarily invalidate a law per se. You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist. If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence? The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case. Perhaps the police know what will happen if they waded into a football crowd to try and arrest the offenders for calling the opposition cockney w***ers or whatever (Is regionalist chanting a criminal offence anyway?) Edited by nickgusset (12 Jun 2015 11.14pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 12 Jun 15 11.13pm

Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm

You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist.

If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence?

The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case.

Perhaps the police know what will happen if they waded into a football crowd to try and arrest the offenders for calling the opposition cockney w***ers or whatever (Is regionalist chanting a criminal offence anyway?)

Edited by nickgusset (12 Jun 2015 11.14pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

derben 13 Jun 15 9.37am
Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories. She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home". Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm) She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy. Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

13 Jun 15 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.

Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)

Alert a moderator to this post

derben 13 Jun 15 9.41am
Quote nickgusset at 12 Jun 2015 11.13pm Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm I took you at face value. It appears in fact she was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence.I believe (I may be wrong) that things like breaching the peace (which I referred to above)are a public order offence.You inflated it to "racism".Some of the press reports refer to a man in the same town being arrested the same day for a racist attack and for having raided a mosque.I said the fact police are OTT in carrying out an arrest doesn't necessarily invalidate a law per se. You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist. If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence? The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case. Perhaps the police know what will happen if they waded into a football crowd to try and arrest the offenders for calling the opposition cockney w***ers or whatever (Is regionalist chanting a criminal offence anyway?) Edited by nickgusset (12 Jun 2015 11.14pm) So, if a few thousand octogenarian women had been there chanting go home, they would have got away with it as our police force can only handle 85-year-old women one at a a time.
Alert a moderator to this post

derben

13 Jun 15 9.41am

Quote nickgusset at 12 Jun 2015 11.13pm

Quote derben at 12 Jun 2015 10.50pm

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.45pm

You said "Your away game examples have nothing to do with racism." with the implication that therefore her 'crime' was racist.

If you now say her 'crime' was merely a public order offence, why then are the home football fans not committing a public order offence?

The man who broke the mosque window has nothing to do with the woman's case.

Edited by nickgusset (12 Jun 2015 11.14pm)

So, if a few thousand octogenarian women had been there chanting go home, they would have got away with it as our police force can only handle 85-year-old women one at a a time.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 5 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Socialism in action

Site Map

Sponsors