You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > No more immigrants.
April 25 2024 5.00am

No more immigrants.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 35 of 85 < 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 >

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 01 Sep 15 12.10pm

Quote dannyh at 01 Sep 2015 11.50am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.38am

Quote dannyh at 01 Sep 2015 10.49am

I would say that a much higher percentage are unskilled especially if you take immigrants from a third world country, not eveyone that jumps the fence or batters a lorry driver is a brain surgeon, and the assumption that they are is as staggering as it is naive.

True, but those who aren't legally entitled to work here or aren't valid asylum cases shouldn't be excluded just because they aren't British either by default, nor do I agree with the EU 'right to work anyhwere' policy, as it simply provides access to cheap labour for companies, without ever addressing the problem of unemployment in the UK and artificially pushes down wage demands.

Quote dannyh at 01 Sep 2015 10.49am
It didnt beneift british construction workers, it put many out of business with cheap European Labour under cutting established building companies, one of my mates scaffolding firms went tits up becuase of thses so called benefits as did many other building Companies. The only People it benfited where the big construction companies who employed the migrant workers, they certainly didnt pass on the savings in labour to the housing market did they Jamie ?

Of course it didn't, the industry benefitted, and profited at the expense of its employees. Same as it always does, but that's capitalism. It isn't about the interests of society, people, or workers, but the production of profit is its driving moral and ethical imperative.

The myth is that supply and demand counter balance each other in real life, towards an ideal that serves a social balance, but it doesn't, because the markets are controlled and influenced towards the interests of production and producers of capital. Hence you can lay off staff to produce a rise in share price, that benefits dividend payments and the company, even if those employees were productive (because you can then replace them with cheaper alternatives).


Quote dannyh at 01 Sep 2015 10.49am
I never said it was the migrants fault. I said that letting more people in to the country in it's current state of diss-repair it fcuking mental and will only put more strain on an already stretched to breking point system. And I see nothing in what you have posted to suggest otherwise.

The problem is though, that state of disrepair is going to continue indefinitely, it has since the 80s, because successive governments have cut public spending in order to cut taxes to win elections. That won't end in any forseeable future. The issue with state infrastructure like the NHS is arguably better off with migration (largely because most migrants will pay in more than they take out, and return to their home nation before they become a 'state burden' in their old age.

Its all smoke and mirrors - Migrants are presented as the problem, because the truth is that the state of disrepair and decay in the UK is the product of government spending polices over the last 40 years



Agreed, but my question is how is letting in 300,000 more people in each year going to help, when a large majority are here just to take what benefits they can get.

I live in the real world Jamie and many on here because of my simplistic views to complex problems insinuate that I'm a racist (it's boring but hey ho.) i hastned to add its not the case, but to argue the country isnt going to hell in a hand cart, is like ignoring the nose on your face, I just don't see how allowing more people in to use a broken infrastructure is the answer to fixing anything, but that it will over time be the straw that breaks the cammels back, sending the NHS et all in to the history books.

The problem is we don't spend enough to cater for everyone here at the minute, whether that be on housing, the NHS, Schools etc etc. So how can letting in more people that will (no doubt what so ever) use those "free" services be of any beneift at all. Further more how can it not aid strain to an already creaking system.

Edited by dannyh (01 Sep 2015 11.54am)

I agree, I'm inclined towards the idea of restricted immigration, notably towards a functional goal. I'm happy with any working migrants on a short term basis to fill vacancies that can't be filled, and those who are genuine asylum seekers (a very small percentage).

My concern is that the solution of migrant labour has become a means by which the state has abdicated its responsibility to the population. Rather than the more expensive process of retraining and relocating the unemployed to fill vacancies, the state has opted to support the interests of the 'middle and upper classes' and corporate interests, and ignore the needs of the majority of society.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View johnfirewall's Profile johnfirewall Flag 01 Sep 15 12.13pm Send a Private Message to johnfirewall Add johnfirewall as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

Quote johnfirewall at 31 Aug 2015 9.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 31 Aug 2015 2.36pm

Quote Penge Eagle at 31 Aug 2015 12.52pm

Britain First went down to Calais and interviewed some of the refugees. Quite interesting footage actually. [Link]


I'd say the people they interviewed were hardly a representation of the people in the camp.

I'd say you see what you want to believe, same as anyone who goes out there to collect the sob stories or vilify.

For example 40% of the population of Syria has had to flee, meaning there are plenty of professionals heading here. Or viewed another way, a million unemployed.

None of this detracts from those ideas and attitudes about the UK that are prevalent inside the camp or anywhere else.

I'd say that I'd trust Britain First to be as reliable a source of information as the Socialist Worker. I'm on the far left, but I wouldn't trust a lot of the far left party sources. Similarly I wouldn't trust a fundermentalist wannabe 'fascist' group like Britain First to tell me the time of day.

And I say wannabe fascist group, because they give Fascism a bad name. At least with the National Socialist et al, you had some intellectual argument, were interesting and engaged in intelligent discourse, along with some snazzy uniforms and flags. Britain First resemble National Socialism, if it was organized by CBBC and dressed by the last day of sales at C&A.

Obviously I wasn't actually able to watch that video because the 'reporters' were awful. Especially the woman, who I'm pretty sure was Beats from People Just Do Nothing's girlfriend.

Therefore I've not relied on them for any information which I wasn't already in posession of or able to verify.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View johnny the eagle's Profile johnny the eagle Flag wivenhoe 01 Sep 15 12.42pm Send a Private Message to johnny the eagle Add johnny the eagle as a friend

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 12.13pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

Quote johnfirewall at 31 Aug 2015 9.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 31 Aug 2015 2.36pm

Quote Penge Eagle at 31 Aug 2015 12.52pm

Britain First went down to Calais and interviewed some of the refugees. Quite interesting footage actually. [Link]


I'd say the people they interviewed were hardly a representation of the people in the camp.

I'd say you see what you want to believe, same as anyone who goes out there to collect the sob stories or vilify.

For example 40% of the population of Syria has had to flee, meaning there are plenty of professionals heading here. Or viewed another way, a million unemployed.

None of this detracts from those ideas and attitudes about the UK that are prevalent inside the camp or anywhere else.

I'd say that I'd trust Britain First to be as reliable a source of information as the Socialist Worker. I'm on the far left, but I wouldn't trust a lot of the far left party sources. Similarly I wouldn't trust a fundermentalist wannabe 'fascist' group like Britain First to tell me the time of day.

And I say wannabe fascist group, because they give Fascism a bad name. At least with the National Socialist et al, you had some intellectual argument, were interesting and engaged in intelligent discourse, along with some snazzy uniforms and flags. Britain First resemble National Socialism, if it was organized by CBBC and dressed by the last day of sales at C&A.

Obviously I wasn't actually able to watch that video because the 'reporters' were awful. Especially the woman, who I'm pretty sure was Beats from People Just Do Nothing's girlfriend.

Therefore I've not relied on them for any information which I wasn't already in posession of or able to verify.

I don't think it was the best bit of journalism on the planet that video, but most of what they were saying I agree with.

 


South London born and bred
red and blue till im dead.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 01 Sep 15 12.49pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

This country truly needs to focus upon solving its internal problems, like providing enough affordable housing and encouraging more higher waged jobs.

We need more immigrants like a hole in the head. We have far too many as it is.

I think the problem is that essentially any UK government is going to solve the problems of corporate interests before the interests of citizens.

In terms of affordable housing, higher wages and employing the unemployed effectively, these require solutions that are election losers (i.e. tax rises or drop in house prices).

Problem with play popularity politics, is that no one wants to do the things that are right, but unpopular.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 01 Sep 15 12.58pm

Quote johnny the eagle at 01 Sep 2015 12.42pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 12.13pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

Quote johnfirewall at 31 Aug 2015 9.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 31 Aug 2015 2.36pm

Quote Penge Eagle at 31 Aug 2015 12.52pm

Britain First went down to Calais and interviewed some of the refugees. Quite interesting footage actually. [Link]


I'd say the people they interviewed were hardly a representation of the people in the camp.

I'd say you see what you want to believe, same as anyone who goes out there to collect the sob stories or vilify.

For example 40% of the population of Syria has had to flee, meaning there are plenty of professionals heading here. Or viewed another way, a million unemployed.

None of this detracts from those ideas and attitudes about the UK that are prevalent inside the camp or anywhere else.

I'd say that I'd trust Britain First to be as reliable a source of information as the Socialist Worker. I'm on the far left, but I wouldn't trust a lot of the far left party sources. Similarly I wouldn't trust a fundermentalist wannabe 'fascist' group like Britain First to tell me the time of day.

And I say wannabe fascist group, because they give Fascism a bad name. At least with the National Socialist et al, you had some intellectual argument, were interesting and engaged in intelligent discourse, along with some snazzy uniforms and flags. Britain First resemble National Socialism, if it was organized by CBBC and dressed by the last day of sales at C&A.

Obviously I wasn't actually able to watch that video because the 'reporters' were awful. Especially the woman, who I'm pretty sure was Beats from People Just Do Nothing's girlfriend.

Therefore I've not relied on them for any information which I wasn't already in posession of or able to verify.

I don't think it was the best bit of journalism on the planet that video, but most of what they were saying I agree with.

I generally think that is how propaganda is supposed to work. Its tailored towards a target audience, those who agree with some of the ideas of Britain First, but not necessarily all of them, as a means of co-opting their support.

Its a common tactic of the far left and far right, to utilize a popular issue, as a means of progressing their own political agenda. To an extent, all politics revolves around this, but extreme groups tend to rely very heavily on this method of 'marketing themselves'.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 01 Sep 15 1.02pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 12.49pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

This country truly needs to focus upon solving its internal problems, like providing enough affordable housing and encouraging more higher waged jobs.

We need more immigrants like a hole in the head. We have far too many as it is.

I think the problem is that essentially any UK government is going to solve the problems of corporate interests before the interests of citizens.

In terms of affordable housing, higher wages and employing the unemployed effectively, these require solutions that are election losers (i.e. tax rises or drop in house prices).

Problem with play popularity politics, is that no one wants to do the things that are right, but unpopular.



It's an excellent point.

At some point though something surely has to give.......I mean just how bad does the housing situation have to get before something radical is done?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View johnfirewall's Profile johnfirewall Flag 01 Sep 15 1.11pm Send a Private Message to johnfirewall Add johnfirewall as a friend

Quote johnny the eagle at 01 Sep 2015 12.42pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 12.13pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

Quote johnfirewall at 31 Aug 2015 9.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 31 Aug 2015 2.36pm

Quote Penge Eagle at 31 Aug 2015 12.52pm

Britain First went down to Calais and interviewed some of the refugees. Quite interesting footage actually. [Link]


I'd say the people they interviewed were hardly a representation of the people in the camp.

I'd say you see what you want to believe, same as anyone who goes out there to collect the sob stories or vilify.

For example 40% of the population of Syria has had to flee, meaning there are plenty of professionals heading here. Or viewed another way, a million unemployed.

None of this detracts from those ideas and attitudes about the UK that are prevalent inside the camp or anywhere else.

I'd say that I'd trust Britain First to be as reliable a source of information as the Socialist Worker. I'm on the far left, but I wouldn't trust a lot of the far left party sources. Similarly I wouldn't trust a fundermentalist wannabe 'fascist' group like Britain First to tell me the time of day.

And I say wannabe fascist group, because they give Fascism a bad name. At least with the National Socialist et al, you had some intellectual argument, were interesting and engaged in intelligent discourse, along with some snazzy uniforms and flags. Britain First resemble National Socialism, if it was organized by CBBC and dressed by the last day of sales at C&A.

Obviously I wasn't actually able to watch that video because the 'reporters' were awful. Especially the woman, who I'm pretty sure was Beats from People Just Do Nothing's girlfriend.

Therefore I've not relied on them for any information which I wasn't already in posession of or able to verify.

I don't think it was the best bit of journalism on the planet that video, but most of what they were saying I agree with.

It's more what the interviewees were saying.

The interesting thing is they're from countries where there is/was a war but they have safehaven in France and money in their pockets to get to England.

They're obviously not deserving if Nick Gusset is dismissing them.

I'm seeing a petition aimed at Theresa May to immediately grant asylum to people 'fleeing war'. A scenario where these people would be accepted by default.

The left generally do want to look after everyone. All this year's crisis has done is take the focus away from the UK's poor who were suffering as a result of the government or bankers. The latter of whom have done the damage, therefore any negatives of immigration are insignificant according to Owen Jones.

Edited by johnfirewall (01 Sep 2015 1.12pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 01 Sep 15 3.08pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 01 Sep 2015 1.02pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 12.49pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

This country truly needs to focus upon solving its internal problems, like providing enough affordable housing and encouraging more higher waged jobs.

We need more immigrants like a hole in the head. We have far too many as it is.

I think the problem is that essentially any UK government is going to solve the problems of corporate interests before the interests of citizens.

In terms of affordable housing, higher wages and employing the unemployed effectively, these require solutions that are election losers (i.e. tax rises or drop in house prices).

Problem with play popularity politics, is that no one wants to do the things that are right, but unpopular.



It's an excellent point.

At some point though something surely has to give.......I mean just how bad does the housing situation have to get before something radical is done?

Generally speaking, nothing radical ever gets done in a democracy. Its the weakness of a democracy. Usually the only thing radical that happens in a democracy involves the transition from democracy...


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 01 Sep 15 3.14pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 1.11pm

Quote johnny the eagle at 01 Sep 2015 12.42pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 12.13pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

Quote johnfirewall at 31 Aug 2015 9.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 31 Aug 2015 2.36pm

Quote Penge Eagle at 31 Aug 2015 12.52pm

Britain First went down to Calais and interviewed some of the refugees. Quite interesting footage actually. [Link]


I'd say the people they interviewed were hardly a representation of the people in the camp.

I'd say you see what you want to believe, same as anyone who goes out there to collect the sob stories or vilify.

For example 40% of the population of Syria has had to flee, meaning there are plenty of professionals heading here. Or viewed another way, a million unemployed.

None of this detracts from those ideas and attitudes about the UK that are prevalent inside the camp or anywhere else.

I'd say that I'd trust Britain First to be as reliable a source of information as the Socialist Worker. I'm on the far left, but I wouldn't trust a lot of the far left party sources. Similarly I wouldn't trust a fundermentalist wannabe 'fascist' group like Britain First to tell me the time of day.

And I say wannabe fascist group, because they give Fascism a bad name. At least with the National Socialist et al, you had some intellectual argument, were interesting and engaged in intelligent discourse, along with some snazzy uniforms and flags. Britain First resemble National Socialism, if it was organized by CBBC and dressed by the last day of sales at C&A.

Obviously I wasn't actually able to watch that video because the 'reporters' were awful. Especially the woman, who I'm pretty sure was Beats from People Just Do Nothing's girlfriend.

Therefore I've not relied on them for any information which I wasn't already in posession of or able to verify.

I don't think it was the best bit of journalism on the planet that video, but most of what they were saying I agree with.

It's more what the interviewees were saying.

The interesting thing is they're from countries where there is/was a war but they have safehaven in France and money in their pockets to get to England.

They're obviously not deserving if Nick Gusset is dismissing them.

I'm seeing a petition aimed at Theresa May to immediately grant asylum to people 'fleeing war'. A scenario where these people would be accepted by default.

The left generally do want to look after everyone. All this year's crisis has done is take the focus away from the UK's poor who were suffering as a result of the government or bankers. The latter of whom have done the damage, therefore any negatives of immigration are insignificant according to Owen Jones.

Edited by johnfirewall (01 Sep 2015 1.12pm)

Ironically, as asylum seekers they're financially a lot better off in France. Thing is, I don't think it terms of people displaced by wars its acceptable to just 'leave it to other nations' to sort out.

Maybe its the British bleeting about how 'generous we are with benefits' which isn't true, that's actually attracting people here in the first place.

Our media does seem to make it sound like we 'lavish' wealth and houses on people, without concern. Somehow I can't help but think that 36.50 and a dodgy landlord s**thole in Weston Super-Mare is going to be a bit of a disappointment.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 01 Sep 15 3.24pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.38am

Quote dannyh at 01 Sep 2015 10.49am

I would say that a much higher percentage are unskilled especially if you take immigrants from a third world country, not eveyone that jumps the fence or batters a lorry driver is a brain surgeon, and the assumption that they are is as staggering as it is naive.

True, but those who aren't legally entitled to work here or aren't valid asylum cases shouldn't be excluded just because they aren't British either by default, nor do I agree with the EU 'right to work anyhwere' policy, as it simply provides access to cheap labour for companies, without ever addressing the problem of unemployment in the UK and artificially pushes down wage demands.

Quote dannyh at 01 Sep 2015 10.49am
It didnt beneift british construction workers, it put many out of business with cheap European Labour under cutting established building companies, one of my mates scaffolding firms went tits up becuase of thses so called benefits as did many other building Companies. The only People it benfited where the big construction companies who employed the migrant workers, they certainly didnt pass on the savings in labour to the housing market did they Jamie ?

Of course it didn't, the industry benefitted, and profited at the expense of its employees. Same as it always does, but that's capitalism. It isn't about the interests of society, people, or workers, but the production of profit is its driving moral and ethical imperative.

The myth is that supply and demand counter balance each other in real life, towards an ideal that serves a social balance, but it doesn't, because the markets are controlled and influenced towards the interests of production and producers of capital. Hence you can lay off staff to produce a rise in share price, that benefits dividend payments and the company, even if those employees were productive (because you can then replace them with cheaper alternatives).


Quote dannyh at 01 Sep 2015 10.49am
I never said it was the migrants fault. I said that letting more people in to the country in it's current state of diss-repair it fcuking mental and will only put more strain on an already stretched to breking point system. And I see nothing in what you have posted to suggest otherwise.

The problem is though, that state of disrepair is going to continue indefinitely, it has since the 80s, because successive governments have cut public spending in order to cut taxes to win elections. That won't end in any forseeable future. The issue with state infrastructure like the NHS is arguably better off with migration (largely because most migrants will pay in more than they take out, and return to their home nation before they become a 'state burden' in their old age.

Its all smoke and mirrors - Migrants are presented as the problem, because the truth is that the state of disrepair and decay in the UK is the product of government spending polices over the last 40 years


Wrong again. Danny's summary was spot on.

The only part of the construction industry to benefit were the extremely large companies, who pay the least tax revenues per pound in the construction industry and regularly rip off the average contractor/labourer/supplier.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View johnfirewall's Profile johnfirewall Flag 01 Sep 15 4.05pm Send a Private Message to johnfirewall Add johnfirewall as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 3.14pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 1.11pm

Quote johnny the eagle at 01 Sep 2015 12.42pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 12.13pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

Quote johnfirewall at 31 Aug 2015 9.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 31 Aug 2015 2.36pm

Quote Penge Eagle at 31 Aug 2015 12.52pm

Britain First went down to Calais and interviewed some of the refugees. Quite interesting footage actually. [Link]


I'd say the people they interviewed were hardly a representation of the people in the camp.

I'd say you see what you want to believe, same as anyone who goes out there to collect the sob stories or vilify.

For example 40% of the population of Syria has had to flee, meaning there are plenty of professionals heading here. Or viewed another way, a million unemployed.

None of this detracts from those ideas and attitudes about the UK that are prevalent inside the camp or anywhere else.

I'd say that I'd trust Britain First to be as reliable a source of information as the Socialist Worker. I'm on the far left, but I wouldn't trust a lot of the far left party sources. Similarly I wouldn't trust a fundermentalist wannabe 'fascist' group like Britain First to tell me the time of day.

And I say wannabe fascist group, because they give Fascism a bad name. At least with the National Socialist et al, you had some intellectual argument, were interesting and engaged in intelligent discourse, along with some snazzy uniforms and flags. Britain First resemble National Socialism, if it was organized by CBBC and dressed by the last day of sales at C&A.

Obviously I wasn't actually able to watch that video because the 'reporters' were awful. Especially the woman, who I'm pretty sure was Beats from People Just Do Nothing's girlfriend.

Therefore I've not relied on them for any information which I wasn't already in posession of or able to verify.

I don't think it was the best bit of journalism on the planet that video, but most of what they were saying I agree with.

It's more what the interviewees were saying.

The interesting thing is they're from countries where there is/was a war but they have safehaven in France and money in their pockets to get to England.

They're obviously not deserving if Nick Gusset is dismissing them.

I'm seeing a petition aimed at Theresa May to immediately grant asylum to people 'fleeing war'. A scenario where these people would be accepted by default.

The left generally do want to look after everyone. All this year's crisis has done is take the focus away from the UK's poor who were suffering as a result of the government or bankers. The latter of whom have done the damage, therefore any negatives of immigration are insignificant according to Owen Jones.

Edited by johnfirewall (01 Sep 2015 1.12pm)

Ironically, as asylum seekers they're financially a lot better off in France. Thing is, I don't think it terms of people displaced by wars its acceptable to just 'leave it to other nations' to sort out.

Maybe its the British bleeting about how 'generous we are with benefits' which isn't true, that's actually attracting people here in the first place.

Our media does seem to make it sound like we 'lavish' wealth and houses on people, without concern. Somehow I can't help but think that 36.50 and a dodgy landlord s**thole in Weston Super-Mare is going to be a bit of a disappointment.


Is this the new argument now then that we're falling behind France and Germany in numbers and benefits? Seems to work for their authorities I suppose. The French are peed off that they're the unfinished bridge to the UK and the Germans that they're the new desirable location. You can see why people might contest the French insistence that it's our problem because that's where the migrants are heading.

Letting people in physically, or in terms of granting asylum are vastly different things, not least because we're an island.

The left can't conjure up a fair solution other than Cooper's petty 10,000 migrants to be shared across the UK or petitions to let everyone in.

Edited by johnfirewall (01 Sep 2015 4.11pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Sedlescombe's Profile Sedlescombe Flag Sedlescombe 02 Sep 15 6.51pm Send a Private Message to Sedlescombe Add Sedlescombe as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 3.14pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 1.11pm

Quote johnny the eagle at 01 Sep 2015 12.42pm

Quote johnfirewall at 01 Sep 2015 12.13pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 01 Sep 2015 11.45am

Quote johnfirewall at 31 Aug 2015 9.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 31 Aug 2015 2.36pm

Quote Penge Eagle at 31 Aug 2015 12.52pm

Britain First went down to Calais and interviewed some of the refugees. Quite interesting footage actually. [Link]


I'd say the people they interviewed were hardly a representation of the people in the camp.

I'd say you see what you want to believe, same as anyone who goes out there to collect the sob stories or vilify.

For example 40% of the population of Syria has had to flee, meaning there are plenty of professionals heading here. Or viewed another way, a million unemployed.

None of this detracts from those ideas and attitudes about the UK that are prevalent inside the camp or anywhere else.

I'd say that I'd trust Britain First to be as reliable a source of information as the Socialist Worker. I'm on the far left, but I wouldn't trust a lot of the far left party sources. Similarly I wouldn't trust a fundermentalist wannabe 'fascist' group like Britain First to tell me the time of day.

And I say wannabe fascist group, because they give Fascism a bad name. At least with the National Socialist et al, you had some intellectual argument, were interesting and engaged in intelligent discourse, along with some snazzy uniforms and flags. Britain First resemble National Socialism, if it was organized by CBBC and dressed by the last day of sales at C&A.

Obviously I wasn't actually able to watch that video because the 'reporters' were awful. Especially the woman, who I'm pretty sure was Beats from People Just Do Nothing's girlfriend.

Therefore I've not relied on them for any information which I wasn't already in posession of or able to verify.

I don't think it was the best bit of journalism on the planet that video, but most of what they were saying I agree with.

It's more what the interviewees were saying.

The interesting thing is they're from countries where there is/was a war but they have safehaven in France and money in their pockets to get to England.

They're obviously not deserving if Nick Gusset is dismissing them.

I'm seeing a petition aimed at Theresa May to immediately grant asylum to people 'fleeing war'. A scenario where these people would be accepted by default.

The left generally do want to look after everyone. All this year's crisis has done is take the focus away from the UK's poor who were suffering as a result of the government or bankers. The latter of whom have done the damage, therefore any negatives of immigration are insignificant according to Owen Jones.

Edited by johnfirewall (01 Sep 2015 1.12pm)

Ironically, as asylum seekers they're financially a lot better off in France. Thing is, I don't think it terms of people displaced by wars its acceptable to just 'leave it to other nations' to sort out.

Maybe its the British bleeting about how 'generous we are with benefits' which isn't true, that's actually attracting people here in the first place.

Our media does seem to make it sound like we 'lavish' wealth and houses on people, without concern. Somehow I can't help but think that 36.50 and a dodgy landlord s**thole in Weston Super-Mare is going to be a bit of a disappointment.


Asylum seekers are financially better off almost everywhere compared to Britain

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 35 of 85 < 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > No more immigrants.