In no way would I describe myself as a Royalist, but, I have to say she has done a remarkable job - and a job that she had no choice in taking on.

She has always conducted herself with a quiet dignity, shown no apparent favouritism to any political party, avoided any temptations to speak out on issues and therefore alienate herself among sections of society,and has , during her reign, tirelessly travelled this country and the rest of the world as our had of state.

Also, she has almost single handedly prevented the monarchy from self-destructing thanks to the shenanigans of certain of its members.

So, whatever you may think of the monarchy as an institution, within its own points of reference and requirements of the occupant of the throne, I think she has been exceptional.

Personally, i feel that is because they are largely exempt from media scrutiny.

The rags in this country seemingly have no issue planting submersible camera's in Kerry Katona's toilet, but the minute a picture of Kate's tit's surface, there's a media blackout.

They enjoy a hell of a lot more privacy then some with their social status normally would, and should. In fact, the level of bias in the media is borderline criminal. The birth of Prince George for example, we were treated to centre fold spreads explaining the important role of Kate's endless amounts of aid's, funded by the taxpayer, who were deemed so important to helping her get through the birth of her child for no other apparent reason other then she said so. And this was being celebrated.

Compare that with the outrage of an MP buying a plant pot on expenses and you get the point.

We pay a lot of money for these b******s, i demand an album of sphincter shots!

Edited by JL85 (09 Sep 2015 11.53am)