You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > paedo gang
March 29 2024 10.40am

paedo gang

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 4 << First< 1 2 3 4

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 14 Sep 15 1.26pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves.
That is clearly what these men thought.

These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 14 Sep 15 3.29pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm

I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves.
That is clearly what these men thought.

These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.

No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'.

Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 14 Sep 15 3.41pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm

I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves.
That is clearly what these men thought.

These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.

No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'.

Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.



All very accurate I'm sure.

And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims.

Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 15 Sep 15 10.42am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm

I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves.
That is clearly what these men thought.

These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.

No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'.

Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.



All very accurate I'm sure.

And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims.

Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain.

It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al.

The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 15 Sep 15 11.17am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 10.42am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm

I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves.
That is clearly what these men thought.

These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.

No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'.

Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.



All very accurate I'm sure.

And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims.

Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain.

It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al.

The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.



Influence has always been a factor in dishing out justice and I suppose, in the cold light of day, there is a sliding scale of sex offences much like everything else. The man, perhaps a celebrity, who picks up a 15 year old, who maybe lies about her age, in a club cannot be catagorised in the same league as the members of a pedophile gang who might even rape small children.
There is however no excuse to overlook the latter to conform to a fashionable attitude.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 15 Sep 15 11.46am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 15 Sep 2015 11.17am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 10.42am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm

I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves.
That is clearly what these men thought.

These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.

No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'.

Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.



All very accurate I'm sure.

And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims.

Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain.

It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al.

The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.



Influence has always been a factor in dishing out justice and I suppose, in the cold light of day, there is a sliding scale of sex offences much like everything else. The man, perhaps a celebrity, who picks up a 15 year old, who maybe lies about her age, in a club cannot be catagorised in the same league as the members of a pedophile gang who might even rape small children.
There is however no excuse to overlook the latter to conform to a fashionable attitude.

Agreed, there is definitely a difference between being an abuser and unlawful sexual intercourse. That said, if the man has a history of 'just accidently picking up young girls who lie about their age in a club'...


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 15 Sep 15 1.00pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 11.46am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 15 Sep 2015 11.17am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 10.42am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 3.41pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 14 Sep 2015 3.29pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 14 Sep 2015 1.26pm

I hope you aren't implying that white girls are easy and bad girls in care sort of brought it on themselves.
That is clearly what these men thought.

These girls, after all, were children and vulnerable and these men knew that and took advantage of that.

No I'm not, but that's more or less how across the last 40 years, the Police and Social Services tend to see it, and that's why abusers of kids in care tend to get away with it, because no one wants to 'risk their career' on kids they've effectively written off. There in lies the problem, a lot of people in vulnerable positions in society are considered 'lesser victims' when it comes to resourcing. Its not that everyone will look the other way, but that they will look for excuses not to do something, especially when it passes up to a superior, who won't have personal experience, but will judge based on the 'record of the child'.

Its very similar to how abuse goes unchecked in mental hospitals, prisons, care homes, old age homes etc. Officals look for reasons not to do something, unless they have to, because they assume nothing will come of it but trouble.



All very accurate I'm sure.

And there you have a perfect recipe for numerous gangs of men who could not get easy sex in their own community because of their religious beliefs happily preying on Western girls that no one seems to care about in an environment of fear over racism claims.

Pretty much sums up 21st century Britain.

It pretty much sums up the failures of not just the 21st century Britain, but 20th century Britain, just trade the term 'fear of racism' for 'fear of celebrity' or 'fear of influence' and you have the Savile Scandal and the Politic abuse of the likes of Smith and Heath et al.

The sad situation is that as long as 'you don't get caught' it seems to have been perfectly acceptable to allow child sex offenders (and sex offenders) to be protected and isolated from even reasonable investigation.



Influence has always been a factor in dishing out justice and I suppose, in the cold light of day, there is a sliding scale of sex offences much like everything else. The man, perhaps a celebrity, who picks up a 15 year old, who maybe lies about her age, in a club cannot be catagorised in the same league as the members of a pedophile gang who might even rape small children.
There is however no excuse to overlook the latter to conform to a fashionable attitude.

Agreed, there is definitely a difference between being an abuser and unlawful sexual intercourse. That said, if the man has a history of 'just accidently picking up young girls who lie about their age in a club'...


...then he probably worked for the BBC in the 70's.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 4 of 4 << First< 1 2 3 4

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > paedo gang