EU forces compulsory quotas on opposed countries
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Cucking Funt  Clapham on the Back 29 Sep 15 1.00pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars? Wouldn't it make more sense for them to go somewhere more culturally compatible? Haven't we seen enough seismic cultural change in this country already?
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
But seriously, given the secular nature of Syria and the fact that many of the refugees won't be Muslim, sending them to countries with poor record of human rights and stong Islamic fundermentalism, probably isn't a good idea. chris123 hove actually 29 Sep 15 1.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars? There is shared religion, culture and language - so emphatically yes.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 29 Sep 15 1.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 1.03pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars? There is shared religion, culture and language - so emphatically yes. Shared religion? That's like saying the local church here in Chislehurst is singing from the same hymnsheet as the KKK.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 29 Sep 15 1.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 29 Sep 2015 1.16pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 1.03pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars? There is shared religion, culture and language - so emphatically yes. Shared religion? That's like saying the local church here in Chislehurst is singing from the same hymnsheet as the KKK.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 29 Sep 15 1.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 29 Sep 2015 1.16pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 1.03pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars? There is shared religion, culture and language - so emphatically yes. Shared religion? That's like saying the local church here in Chislehurst is singing from the same hymnsheet as the KKK. No, plenty of Sunnis in the Gulf.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 29 Sep 15 1.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars?
I didn't see them bailing out Greece, Ireland, Portugal etc when they were f***ed! Oh yeah, because they're not even on the same frigging continent.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 29 Sep 15 3.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Stuk at 29 Sep 2015 1.43pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars?
I didn't see them bailing out Greece, Ireland, Portugal etc when they were f***ed! Oh yeah, because they're not even on the same frigging continent. Which refugee situation was that?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 29 Sep 15 3.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 1.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Sep 2015 1.16pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 1.03pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars? There is shared religion, culture and language - so emphatically yes. Shared religion? That's like saying the local church here in Chislehurst is singing from the same hymnsheet as the KKK. No, plenty of Sunnis in the Gulf. You do realize that only around 60% of Syrians are Sunni anyhow (and that's also the large basis on which IS have been recruiting in Syria and Iraq, from the Sunni). Whilst I'm sure many Sunni have fled they're probably the group with the least to fear from IS.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 29 Sep 15 3.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 3.50pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 1.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 29 Sep 2015 1.16pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 1.03pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars? There is shared religion, culture and language - so emphatically yes. Shared religion? That's like saying the local church here in Chislehurst is singing from the same hymnsheet as the KKK. No, plenty of Sunnis in the Gulf. You do realize that only around 60% of Syrians are Sunni anyhow (and that's also the large basis on which IS have been recruiting in Syria and Iraq, from the Sunni). Whilst I'm sure many Sunni have fled they're probably the group with the least to fear from IS.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 29 Sep 15 4.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 3.42pm
Quote Stuk at 29 Sep 2015 1.43pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.55pm
Quote chris123 at 29 Sep 2015 12.15pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Sep 2015 12.04pm
Quote Jimenez at 27 Sep 2015 12.01am
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.58pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.48pm
Quote oldcodger at 26 Sep 2015 11.46pm
Quote Jimenez at 26 Sep 2015 11.43pm
Any way back on track lads. What we should be doing is holding them all in transit and dispersing them back to Muslim countries such as Qatar, UAE, Kuwait etc. Especially those with strong fundamentalist leanings. Why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings? Meaning refugees. But again, why would you want to send them to countries with strong fundamentalist leanings?
Clearly you've never been to Basingstoke, no one fits in there... Not to mention, that maybe sending them to countries with a history of creating radicals and tolerating them (provided they export their horror) is self defeating. Somehow, sending people to countries with a reputation for exporting terrorism and fundermentalists might be somewhat self defeating long term. Its not like any Saudi's were in on the 9/11 thing, or have been flogging weapons to IS (via funding to Sunni insurgents in Iraq). The Gulf states should between them be able to take every single Syrian. The default of coming to Europe has just been too easy and the Gulf's attitude to providing safe haven for incomers will not change, while Germany/Europe's willingness to step in continues. I see, so the solution to refugees should be that we can expect other countries to take people in, but we ourselves won't actually do so. Curiously, not many seem to be flowing to the UAE or Saudi Arabia. Possibly because many of them are fleeing extremist Muslims nutbars?
I didn't see them bailing out Greece, Ireland, Portugal etc when they were f***ed! Oh yeah, because they're not even on the same frigging continent. Which refugee situation was that? This one, Syria and those jumping on it's bandwagon. They don't allow anyone to settle permanently, strictly only allowed to be there while working out there and packed off the second you're no longer doing so.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 07 Oct 15 12.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.