You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > red meat cancer risk
April 24 2024 10.46am

red meat cancer risk

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 29 Oct 15 3.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 2.57pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 1.10pm

Quote npn at 29 Oct 2015 11.20am

[Link]

Absolutely, having spent some time in old age homes over the last few years (until my nan died), don't fear death, fear regrets about living.

The problem is though that cancer is a horrible and painful way to die. Euthanasia would be my preference close to the end.


Wise words to a point.

We shouldn't spend our lives worrying about death but we don't want to encourage it either.
We are not always just living for ourselves.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Oct 2015 2.57pm)

I kind of am, my wife is the only dependent I have and am likely to ever have. There are two cats and that's about it. Everyone else, has their own lives to live how they want. Even partners when you think about it. Anyone who has foolishly made themselves dependent on my existence, has tragically misunderstood me and who I am. My only concern really is the two cats.

Of course that's just me. I don't really care too much how other people choose to live their lives.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 29 Oct 15 4.14pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 3.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 2.57pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 1.10pm

Quote npn at 29 Oct 2015 11.20am

[Link]

Absolutely, having spent some time in old age homes over the last few years (until my nan died), don't fear death, fear regrets about living.

The problem is though that cancer is a horrible and painful way to die. Euthanasia would be my preference close to the end.


Wise words to a point.

We shouldn't spend our lives worrying about death but we don't want to encourage it either.
We are not always just living for ourselves.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Oct 2015 2.57pm)

I kind of am, my wife is the only dependent I have and am likely to ever have. There are two cats and that's about it. Everyone else, has their own lives to live how they want. Even partners when you think about it. Anyone who has foolishly made themselves dependent on my existence, has tragically misunderstood me and who I am. My only concern really is the two cats.

Of course that's just me. I don't really care too much how other people choose to live their lives.

Well you don't understand living for others unless you have kids. They make you realize that there is more to life than just you.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 29 Oct 15 4.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 4.14pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 3.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 2.57pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 1.10pm

Quote npn at 29 Oct 2015 11.20am

[Link]

Absolutely, having spent some time in old age homes over the last few years (until my nan died), don't fear death, fear regrets about living.

The problem is though that cancer is a horrible and painful way to die. Euthanasia would be my preference close to the end.


Wise words to a point.

We shouldn't spend our lives worrying about death but we don't want to encourage it either.
We are not always just living for ourselves.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Oct 2015 2.57pm)

I kind of am, my wife is the only dependent I have and am likely to ever have. There are two cats and that's about it. Everyone else, has their own lives to live how they want. Even partners when you think about it. Anyone who has foolishly made themselves dependent on my existence, has tragically misunderstood me and who I am. My only concern really is the two cats.

Of course that's just me. I don't really care too much how other people choose to live their lives.

Well you don't understand living for others unless you have kids. They make you realize that there is more to life than just you.

Of course, equally, people who have kids now are in a position where to equate meaning from that decision, they have to place great importance on the well being of their children (and its kind of unacceptable to say that 'it was a terrible mistake' - you just have to make the most of it).

I wouldn't say I don't understand 'living for others', I'd say I understand it well enough to say 'that's not for me'. If other people want kids, I don't really care, that's their choice.

My cats, for example, are very important to me, probably more important to me, than your kids, but that's just a subjective attachment thing, I'm pretty sure your kids are more important to you, than my cats.

I don't even object to paying tax that goes out on things like Education, Child support etc, even whilst they up the tax on booze and fags.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 29 Oct 15 6.40pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 4.14pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 3.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 2.57pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 1.10pm

Quote npn at 29 Oct 2015 11.20am

[Link]

Absolutely, having spent some time in old age homes over the last few years (until my nan died), don't fear death, fear regrets about living.

The problem is though that cancer is a horrible and painful way to die. Euthanasia would be my preference close to the end.


Wise words to a point.

We shouldn't spend our lives worrying about death but we don't want to encourage it either.
We are not always just living for ourselves.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Oct 2015 2.57pm)

I kind of am, my wife is the only dependent I have and am likely to ever have. There are two cats and that's about it. Everyone else, has their own lives to live how they want. Even partners when you think about it. Anyone who has foolishly made themselves dependent on my existence, has tragically misunderstood me and who I am. My only concern really is the two cats.

Of course that's just me. I don't really care too much how other people choose to live their lives.

Well you don't understand living for others unless you have kids. They make you realize that there is more to life than just you.

Of course, equally, people who have kids now are in a position where to equate meaning from that decision, they have to place great importance on the well being of their children (and its kind of unacceptable to say that 'it was a terrible mistake' - you just have to make the most of it).

I wouldn't say I don't understand 'living for others', I'd say I understand it well enough to say 'that's not for me'. If other people want kids, I don't really care, that's their choice.

My cats, for example, are very important to me, probably more important to me, than your kids, but that's just a subjective attachment thing, I'm pretty sure your kids are more important to you, than my cats.

I don't even object to paying tax that goes out on things like Education, Child support etc, even whilst they up the tax on booze and fags.


Having kids is never a mistake. The mistake is not appreciating the gift.
Love for your children is more than just a subjective attachment.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View oldcodger's Profile oldcodger Flag 29 Oct 15 6.56pm Send a Private Message to oldcodger Add oldcodger as a friend

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 6.40pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 4.14pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 3.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 2.57pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 1.10pm

Quote npn at 29 Oct 2015 11.20am

[Link]

Absolutely, having spent some time in old age homes over the last few years (until my nan died), don't fear death, fear regrets about living.

The problem is though that cancer is a horrible and painful way to die. Euthanasia would be my preference close to the end.


Wise words to a point.

We shouldn't spend our lives worrying about death but we don't want to encourage it either.
We are not always just living for ourselves.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Oct 2015 2.57pm)

I kind of am, my wife is the only dependent I have and am likely to ever have. There are two cats and that's about it. Everyone else, has their own lives to live how they want. Even partners when you think about it. Anyone who has foolishly made themselves dependent on my existence, has tragically misunderstood me and who I am. My only concern really is the two cats.

Of course that's just me. I don't really care too much how other people choose to live their lives.

Well you don't understand living for others unless you have kids. They make you realize that there is more to life than just you.

Of course, equally, people who have kids now are in a position where to equate meaning from that decision, they have to place great importance on the well being of their children (and its kind of unacceptable to say that 'it was a terrible mistake' - you just have to make the most of it).

I wouldn't say I don't understand 'living for others', I'd say I understand it well enough to say 'that's not for me'. If other people want kids, I don't really care, that's their choice.

My cats, for example, are very important to me, probably more important to me, than your kids, but that's just a subjective attachment thing, I'm pretty sure your kids are more important to you, than my cats.

I don't even object to paying tax that goes out on things like Education, Child support etc, even whilst they up the tax on booze and fags.


Having kids is never a mistake. The mistake is not appreciating the gift.
Love for your children is more than just a subjective attachment.

If a person is honest enough to admit that they don't feel they would be capable of giving their all to their kids I think it's a very adult decision to make. Many are totally the wrong match for raising kids, do so anyway and just damage a life in the process.


Edited by oldcodger (29 Oct 2015 6.58pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Oct 15 9.31am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 6.40pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 4.14pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 3.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 2.57pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 1.10pm

Quote npn at 29 Oct 2015 11.20am

[Link]

Absolutely, having spent some time in old age homes over the last few years (until my nan died), don't fear death, fear regrets about living.

The problem is though that cancer is a horrible and painful way to die. Euthanasia would be my preference close to the end.


Wise words to a point.

We shouldn't spend our lives worrying about death but we don't want to encourage it either.
We are not always just living for ourselves.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Oct 2015 2.57pm)

I kind of am, my wife is the only dependent I have and am likely to ever have. There are two cats and that's about it. Everyone else, has their own lives to live how they want. Even partners when you think about it. Anyone who has foolishly made themselves dependent on my existence, has tragically misunderstood me and who I am. My only concern really is the two cats.

Of course that's just me. I don't really care too much how other people choose to live their lives.

Well you don't understand living for others unless you have kids. They make you realize that there is more to life than just you.

Of course, equally, people who have kids now are in a position where to equate meaning from that decision, they have to place great importance on the well being of their children (and its kind of unacceptable to say that 'it was a terrible mistake' - you just have to make the most of it).

I wouldn't say I don't understand 'living for others', I'd say I understand it well enough to say 'that's not for me'. If other people want kids, I don't really care, that's their choice.

My cats, for example, are very important to me, probably more important to me, than your kids, but that's just a subjective attachment thing, I'm pretty sure your kids are more important to you, than my cats.

I don't even object to paying tax that goes out on things like Education, Child support etc, even whilst they up the tax on booze and fags.


Having kids is never a mistake. The mistake is not appreciating the gift.
Love for your children is more than just a subjective attachment.

I think that's probably true, though for some people having children is a terrible mistake. I'm not really cut out for parenting and raising kids.

Of course, as devils advocate as I'm not sure I really believe this, there is an awfully strong case that the love people feel for their kids is just a evolutionary imperative driven by biochemistry (certainly I'd say its partially true). It would be absurd to dismiss the evolutionary advantages of attachment to children.

I think we are both capable of love, and biologically programed to love, and experience love in a multitude of different levels. Love for our kids maybe feels stronger than others simply because of the evolutionary imperative (and in adoption we are essentially sociologically engaging those drives through a different mechanism, essentially fooling our neurological systems.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 30 Oct 15 9.47am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

If one of my kids had terminal cancer it would take me all of two seconds to decide to have it for them, if that were a possibility.

Call it love, protection, or both, but whatever it is that feeling of someone else being more precious than your own life is kinda humbling.

Ricky Gervais is another cat-lover who has decided not to have kids. I'm confused between respecting his decision but also feeling a bit disappointed as I think he is depriving a couple of children of having a great dad and him not realising the sheer amount of fun he is missing out on, but also it is none of my bloody business.

Put it this way - I don't believe he would give up his own life to save his moggie's.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 30 Oct 15 12.47pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 9.31am

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 6.40pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 4.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 4.14pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 3.54pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 29 Oct 2015 2.57pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 29 Oct 2015 1.10pm

Quote npn at 29 Oct 2015 11.20am

[Link]

Absolutely, having spent some time in old age homes over the last few years (until my nan died), don't fear death, fear regrets about living.

The problem is though that cancer is a horrible and painful way to die. Euthanasia would be my preference close to the end.


Wise words to a point.

We shouldn't spend our lives worrying about death but we don't want to encourage it either.
We are not always just living for ourselves.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (29 Oct 2015 2.57pm)

I kind of am, my wife is the only dependent I have and am likely to ever have. There are two cats and that's about it. Everyone else, has their own lives to live how they want. Even partners when you think about it. Anyone who has foolishly made themselves dependent on my existence, has tragically misunderstood me and who I am. My only concern really is the two cats.

Of course that's just me. I don't really care too much how other people choose to live their lives.

Well you don't understand living for others unless you have kids. They make you realize that there is more to life than just you.

Of course, equally, people who have kids now are in a position where to equate meaning from that decision, they have to place great importance on the well being of their children (and its kind of unacceptable to say that 'it was a terrible mistake' - you just have to make the most of it).

I wouldn't say I don't understand 'living for others', I'd say I understand it well enough to say 'that's not for me'. If other people want kids, I don't really care, that's their choice.

My cats, for example, are very important to me, probably more important to me, than your kids, but that's just a subjective attachment thing, I'm pretty sure your kids are more important to you, than my cats.

I don't even object to paying tax that goes out on things like Education, Child support etc, even whilst they up the tax on booze and fags.


Having kids is never a mistake. The mistake is not appreciating the gift.
Love for your children is more than just a subjective attachment.

I think that's probably true, though for some people having children is a terrible mistake. I'm not really cut out for parenting and raising kids.

Of course, as devils advocate as I'm not sure I really believe this, there is an awfully strong case that the love people feel for their kids is just a evolutionary imperative driven by biochemistry (certainly I'd say its partially true). It would be absurd to dismiss the evolutionary advantages of attachment to children.

I think we are both capable of love, and biologically programed to love, and experience love in a multitude of different levels. Love for our kids maybe feels stronger than others simply because of the evolutionary imperative (and in adoption we are essentially sociologically engaging those drives through a different mechanism, essentially fooling our neurological systems.



We can boil all human behaviour down to biological imperative but from a human perspective, the love of children cannot be compared to the attachment to pets or inanimate objects. Not even to one's partner. It is different and it is more.
There is a lot of negativity from some parents about parenthood and a lot of fear and lack of confidence from those contemplating it. For me this is a symptom of the selfish, self indulgent world we live in. All I can say is that from the second you hold your child for the first time there is an instant bond created which is never broken and is like no other love. It might be Darwinian or Dawkinsian in nature but those who don't form it must be flawed by that measure at least, and those who choose not to experience it are missing out on one of life's greatest feelings.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 30 Oct 15 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 30 Oct 2015 12.47pm

We can boil all human behaviour down to biological imperative but from a human perspective, the love of children cannot be compared to the attachment to pets or inanimate objects. Not even to one's partner. It is different and it is more.

Well yes, because evolutionary speaking, the necessity of the survival of genetic material from one generation to the next, is the core basis of being. It would make sense that we care very much about the well being of our off spring.

Of course its not a universal thing, that people love their children either beyond all other things, or that the expression of that love and emotion promotes the well being of that child. Plenty of people harm and kill their own children. Also of course people form incredible degrees of love for adopted children as well.

You say its different and more, it might be, I can't really answer that. I suspect that its different, rather than more, and tied to a much deeper drive and need than to family (we expect to replace our parents, on some level we're aware we will lose our partner and pets but children we can very reasonably expect to never 'leave us' (for most of us, our children will survive us, and the capacity of experiencing love without threat of loss of love, rejection or abandonment is very real).

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 30 Oct 2015 12.47pm

There is a lot of negativity from some parents about parenthood and a lot of fear and lack of confidence from those contemplating it. For me this is a symptom of the selfish, self indulgent world we live in.

I think its their experience. I think it demeans people to say that their experience is somehow inferior because it differs to your own - I know people with kids who hold both negative and positive views, and hated the fact that people 'gloss over' how f**king hard having kids is, how much strain it puts on a relationship and life. I don't really consider selfishness a problem, but agree in regard to self indulgence.

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 30 Oct 2015 12.47pm
All I can say is that from the second you hold your child for the first time there is an instant bond created which is never broken and is like no other love. It might be Darwinian or Dawkinsian in nature but those who don't form it must be flawed by that measure at least, and those who choose not to experience it are missing out on one of life's greatest feelings.

Probably true, especially the last part. That said, its not for everyone, and from an outside perspective it seems that its really hard work and a massive responsibility, and that's definitely not for me - no matter how good 'that feeling is', I'd still make a terrible parent.

Of course for some people that bond isn't the same. I think that some people are definitely very suited to being parents, but that a lot of people have children for much less noble reasons. I don't necessarily think those who don't feel that bond are flawed (my mum didn't feel that feeling for months).

Then again I've said exactly the same thing about LSD and Magic Mushrooms.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 30 Oct 15 2.03pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Oct 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 30 Oct 2015 12.47pm

We can boil all human behaviour down to biological imperative but from a human perspective, the love of children cannot be compared to the attachment to pets or inanimate objects. Not even to one's partner. It is different and it is more.

Well yes, because evolutionary speaking, the necessity of the survival of genetic material from one generation to the next, is the core basis of being. It would make sense that we care very much about the well being of our off spring.

Of course its not a universal thing, that people love their children either beyond all other things, or that the expression of that love and emotion promotes the well being of that child. Plenty of people harm and kill their own children. Also of course people form incredible degrees of love for adopted children as well.

You say its different and more, it might be, I can't really answer that. I suspect that its different, rather than more, and tied to a much deeper drive and need than to family (we expect to replace our parents, on some level we're aware we will lose our partner and pets but children we can very reasonably expect to never 'leave us' (for most of us, our children will survive us, and the capacity of experiencing love without threat of loss of love, rejection or abandonment is very real).

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 30 Oct 2015 12.47pm

There is a lot of negativity from some parents about parenthood and a lot of fear and lack of confidence from those contemplating it. For me this is a symptom of the selfish, self indulgent world we live in.

I think its their experience. I think it demeans people to say that their experience is somehow inferior because it differs to your own - I know people with kids who hold both negative and positive views, and hated the fact that people 'gloss over' how f**king hard having kids is, how much strain it puts on a relationship and life. I don't really consider selfishness a problem, but agree in regard to self indulgence.

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 30 Oct 2015 12.47pm
All I can say is that from the second you hold your child for the first time there is an instant bond created which is never broken and is like no other love. It might be Darwinian or Dawkinsian in nature but those who don't form it must be flawed by that measure at least, and those who choose not to experience it are missing out on one of life's greatest feelings.

Probably true, especially the last part. That said, its not for everyone, and from an outside perspective it seems that its really hard work and a massive responsibility, and that's definitely not for me - no matter how good 'that feeling is', I'd still make a terrible parent.

Of course for some people that bond isn't the same. I think that some people are definitely very suited to being parents, but that a lot of people have children for much less noble reasons. I don't necessarily think those who don't feel that bond are flawed (my mum didn't feel that feeling for months).

Then again I've said exactly the same thing about LSD and Magic Mushrooms.


You always make a rational intellectual argument but trying to explain the joy of parenthood to a non parent is like a woman trying to tell a man what it is like to be female. There is no frame of reference.

Magic mushrooms lol.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > red meat cancer risk