You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Arrest Blair
April 25 2024 5.57am

Arrest Blair

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

 

Pussay Patrol Flag 14 Dec 15 9.55pm

[Link]


If you see Tony Blair, perform a citizens arrest..!

Serious money to be earned !

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
suicideatselhurst Flag crawley 14 Dec 15 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??

 


Theres someone in my head ... But its not me

X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View becky's Profile becky Flag over the moon 15 Dec 15 8.41am Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??


Well, the linked article is from about 2010, so it may not still be running, but if they can ruin a man's reputation and have him up in court for sexual assault for nothing more than pinching a woman's backside 25 years ago, then why should Tony Blair's crimes just be forgotten about?

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jamesrichards8's Profile Jamesrichards8 Flag 15 Dec 15 8.45am Send a Private Message to Jamesrichards8 Add Jamesrichards8 as a friend

Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am

Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??


Well, the linked article is from about 2010, so it may not still be running, but if they can ruin a man's reputation and have him up in court for sexual assault for nothing more than pinching a woman's backside 25 years ago, then why should Tony Blair's crimes just be forgotten about?


It is refreshing to hear a woman say this.

 


When you’re knocked on your back and your life’s a flop...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 15 Dec 15 9.56am

Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am

Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??


Well, the linked article is from about 2010, so it may not still be running, but if they can ruin a man's reputation and have him up in court for sexual assault for nothing more than pinching a woman's backside 25 years ago, then why should Tony Blair's crimes just be forgotten about?

I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true.

A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead.

I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war.

The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 15 Dec 15 11.42am

He'd just do a "Greville Janner" and claim he had dementia (tried and tested politician's defence strategy) just after he had legally secured his financial assets for wife/family.

More slippery than an eel.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 15 Dec 15 12.28pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 15 Dec 2015 11.42am

He'd just do a "Greville Janner" and claim he had dementia (tried and tested politician's defence strategy) just after he had legally secured his financial assets for wife/family.

More slippery than an eel.

Probably true. I suspect he's inside the scope of 'reasonable doubt' - He'll probably have all the angles covered to avoid actually having to accept the consequences of his actions, and have a few 'fall guys' who'd take the blame.

The c**t.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 15 Dec 15 12.46pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am

Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am

Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??


Well, the linked article is from about 2010, so it may not still be running, but if they can ruin a man's reputation and have him up in court for sexual assault for nothing more than pinching a woman's backside 25 years ago, then why should Tony Blair's crimes just be forgotten about?

I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true.

A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead.

I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war.

The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'



It's not like he'll have family or friends... Your reputation isn't only a public thing.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 15 Dec 15 12.56pm

Quote Stuk at 15 Dec 2015 12.46pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am

Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am

Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??


Well, the linked article is from about 2010, so it may not still be running, but if they can ruin a man's reputation and have him up in court for sexual assault for nothing more than pinching a woman's backside 25 years ago, then why should Tony Blair's crimes just be forgotten about?

I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true.

A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead.

I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war.

The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'



It's not like he'll have family or friends... Your reputation isn't only a public thing.

Would you admit to being a friend of a Capital radio DJ, even an ex

I was just joking - of course its terrible that a mans reputation was dragged through the mud. That said, some of his behaviour whilst not the offence charged would arguably be considered 'questionable' and border on harassment, and it fell into an area where determination of whether it was an offence was uncertain.

that said, the cases were regarded as believable and reliable, and pointed to events that had occurred but were not, actually criminal in the context.

The CPS were right to prosecute, they had a reasonable ground for believing they could obtain a conviction, reliable witnesses etc.

Its just sad that maybe people are more interested in scandal than absolution. Its like a Sun retraction, everyone remembers the headline on the front page, no one sees the retraction in the corner of page 15.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 15 Dec 15 1.31pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 12.56pm

Quote Stuk at 15 Dec 2015 12.46pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am

Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am

Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??


Well, the linked article is from about 2010, so it may not still be running, but if they can ruin a man's reputation and have him up in court for sexual assault for nothing more than pinching a woman's backside 25 years ago, then why should Tony Blair's crimes just be forgotten about?

I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true.

A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead.

I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war.

The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'



It's not like he'll have family or friends... Your reputation isn't only a public thing.

Would you admit to being a friend of a Capital radio DJ, even an ex

I was just joking - of course its terrible that a mans reputation was dragged through the mud. That said, some of his behaviour whilst not the offence charged would arguably be considered 'questionable' and border on harassment, and it fell into an area where determination of whether it was an offence was uncertain.

that said, the cases were regarded as believable and reliable, and pointed to events that had occurred but were not, actually criminal in the context.

The CPS were right to prosecute, they had a reasonable ground for believing they could obtain a conviction, reliable witnesses etc.

Its just sad that maybe people are more interested in scandal than absolution. Its like a Sun retraction, everyone remembers the headline on the front page, no one sees the retraction in the corner of page 15.



I completely disagree. There was/is no evidence and they've only acted on the word of someone from x amount of years ago.

Once again the accusers simply walk away. I've said it before that both sides should have the option of anonymity, or neither. And I don't buy the argument that it encourages others to do so.

Make your own complaint if it actually happened rather than thinking i'll jump on that bandwagon now everyone already thinks he's a nonce/bandit.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
suicideatselhurst Flag crawley 15 Dec 15 2.55pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Dec 2015 9.56am

Quote becky at 15 Dec 2015 8.41am

Quote suicideatselhurst at 14 Dec 2015 11.11pm

Fvcking hell ..are people still banging on about this ??


Well, the linked article is from about 2010, so it may not still be running, but if they can ruin a man's reputation and have him up in court for sexual assault for nothing more than pinching a woman's backside 25 years ago, then why should Tony Blair's crimes just be forgotten about?

I'm not sure you could ruin Dr Fox's reputation but otherwise I agree, Blair should be held accountable for the decisions made in the run up to 2003 Invasion which resulted in the death of UK service men on a fabricated pretext - that he the prime minister on TV absolutely swore to the public was unequivocally true.

A lot of servicemen died as result of that decision, and a lot more were very seriously wounded, maimed, not to mention the culpability in the number of Iraqi dead.

I wouldn't bother with a trial either. That decision, of such gravity, put millions of lives in danger, and thousands of British lives in the firing line, his freedom should be forfeit as a consequence and a lesson to others in his position that we demand a higher standard than 'I think so/I want to' from our leaders when making decisions about going to war.

The war was unnecessary, and the cost was born by servicemen who had signed up to protect their country, and instead were sacrificed as political pawns to the 'glory of Tony Blair's ambition'



Completely disagree with you jamie, we should of gone in and done Sadam after the 1990 war, he was acting on evidence obtained by mainly British intelligence along with American intell, I don't think for one minute it was to further any ambition he had, the fact that the left in this country keep banging on about it is a good reason to let it go

 


Theres someone in my head ... But its not me

X/Box game Tag bazcpfc1961, clan (HMS)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View bright&wright's Profile bright&wright Flag 15 Dec 15 3.14pm Send a Private Message to bright&wright Add bright&wright as a friend

It's funny how people genuinely believe Blair had a choice.

Whoever is in charge does whatever the Yanks tell them to do.


 


'We are going to make a little bit of history here’ Mr. J. Ertl.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Arrest Blair