You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
April 25 2024 4.18pm

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 102 of 2586 < 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 >

Topic Locked

View snytaxx's Profile snytaxx Flag London 29 May 16 3.21pm Send a Private Message to snytaxx Add snytaxx as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

The EU commission consists of one person from each member state put forward by the government of that country. Our elected government chooses who will represent the U.K.

As for being against investment in Africa, of course there should be investment. What a facile argument to ally me with being against that.
It would be like me saying you agree with the poster I linked to earlier saying 'watch out ze Germans are coming'

Exactly what mandate does the current UK government have to select a representative. Is the name of said representative printed in the tory party 2015 election manifesto. Once selected, is his nomination ratified by the UK parliament?

Alas Gusset, I ask you not to take any of my arguments personally, I am merely trying to get inside your head to find out if / why you think EU membership will really help us reach out to the world in the way I think we all want to and not just totally get in the way of this country's true potential to be of benefit to the world.

Also lastly... I do agree with the poster. I hope Roy and the boys really take it into consideration ahead of the Euros next month.

Edited by snytaxx (29 May 2016 3.23pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View JohnyBoy's Profile JohnyBoy Flag 29 May 16 3.31pm Send a Private Message to JohnyBoy Add JohnyBoy as a friend

Originally posted by snytaxx

MEPS do vote on legislation, introduced by the commission, who votes for them Mr. Gusset?

Just to clarify then, you are against my visions of investment in Africa and on trade with practically every other continent in the world because I worded it in a really optimistic way as opposed to flooding the HOL with predictions of doom and gloom?

As the so called rag at hand. Its the peoples daily, you can find a link to their online news here, sadly you wont find much coverage about the EU referendum as today's feature is about how President Xi plans to "drive through the old age harmonious sustainable economic development". Just what we can do... once we leave the EU. Yaay!

[Link]

*after edit

Responding to point about our own government. I agree, they are t***s, however we could always vote them out in 4 years time though right?


Edited by snytaxx (29 May 2016 3.04pm)

This is again a distortion. We have a uk general election, uk local elections, mep european elections, mayoral elections and even down here in sussex police commissioner elections - which means my kids nursery was shut fir a day as it was used as a polling station ffs. In the UK we have commissioned reports by industry experts e.g paul myners, lord browne, adair turner etc...all unelected, who compile reports with their teams and make recommendations. None can become law without an mp vote (although the house of lords (also unelected) can veto.
Similarly in the eu they have specialists i.e. non politicians making recommendations or most usually trading standards that ensure quality, farming methods etc. So when Boris complains about 4 banana regulations from an unelected body, what does he want, an elected minister for bananas?! Really?!
And we are not prevented from trading with the rest of the world be it a socialist paradise or an african dictatorship unless there are sanctons. I've read on here that 55% of our overseas trade is now outside of the eu (and subject to wto rules which would be the same in event of brexit) so this part of our trade is flourishing already

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 29 May 16 3.45pm

[Link]

Here's an interesting perspective on a left wing exit argument. Not saying I agree with all of it, but raises some salient points.


I still don't know which way to vote...

Edited by nickgusset (29 May 2016 3.46pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View snytaxx's Profile snytaxx Flag London 29 May 16 3.51pm Send a Private Message to snytaxx Add snytaxx as a friend

Originally posted by JohnyBoy

This is again a distortion. We have a uk general election, uk local elections, mep european elections, mayoral elections and even down here in sussex police commissioner elections - which means my kids nursery was shut fir a day as it was used as a polling station ffs. In the UK we have commissioned reports by industry experts e.g paul myners, lord browne, adair turner etc...all unelected, who compile reports with their teams and make recommendations. None can become law without an mp vote (although the house of lords (also unelected) can veto.
Similarly in the eu they have specialists i.e. non politicians making recommendations or most usually trading standards that ensure quality, farming methods etc. So when Boris complains about 4 banana regulations from an unelected body, what does he want, an elected minister for bananas?! Really?!
And we are not prevented from trading with the rest of the world be it a socialist paradise or an african dictatorship unless there are sanctons. I've read on here that 55% of our overseas trade is now outside of the eu (and subject to wto rules which would be the same in event of brexit) so this part of our trade is flourishing already

Ignoring the point about schools (I dont want to be accused of accusing you of being against democracy).

1. 'Commissioned' reports - who commissions these reports? Our elected government. Who chooses whether or not to implement their recommendations? Our elected government. Who gets to debate / amend parts of the legislation? Our elected MP's. Does the same process of scrutiny occur in the EU - possibly, but not by elected officials from this country

2. Trade outside the EU. We are absolutely prevented properly trading with countries outside the 'common market'. As the EU puts tariffs on some non european goods, those countries tend to retaliate by tariffing common market goods (within WTO rules - assuming they are a member). As a member of the common market, we are therefore subject to those tariffs even if it isn't of benefit to us.

Also, as members of the EU, we are prevented from signing our own trade deals unless ratified by the rest of the EU, a lengthy and arduous process.

When we do get a trade deal such as the EU - USA one, we find that it isn't tailored to our interests as it will pave the way for US companies to purchase parts of the NHS.

To say that non - EU trade is unaffected by EU membership when we can't even pick up the phone and talk about a trade deal with another country i'm afraid is distortion max!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View JohnyBoy's Profile JohnyBoy Flag 29 May 16 4.06pm Send a Private Message to JohnyBoy Add JohnyBoy as a friend

Originally posted by snytaxx

Ignoring the point about schools (I dont want to be accused of accusing you of being against democracy).

1. 'Commissioned' reports - who commissions these reports? Our elected government. Who chooses whether or not to implement their recommendations? Our elected government. Who gets to debate / amend parts of the legislation? Our elected MP's. Does the same process of scrutiny occur in the EU - possibly, but not by elected officials from this country

2. Trade outside the EU. We are absolutely prevented properly trading with countries outside the 'common market'. As the EU puts tariffs on some non european goods, those countries tend to retaliate by tariffing common market goods (within WTO rules - assuming they are a member). As a member of the common market, we are therefore subject to those tariffs even if it isn't of benefit to us.

Also, as members of the EU, we are prevented from signing our own trade deals unless ratified by the rest of the EU, a lengthy and arduous process.

When we do get a trade deal such as the EU - USA one, we find that it isn't tailored to our interests as it will pave the way for US companies to purchase parts of the NHS.

To say that non - EU trade is unaffected by EU membership when we can't even pick up the phone and talk about a trade deal with another country i'm afraid is distortion max!

1. We elect mep's do we not? And if its traded in the eu i dont have a problem that there are rules and regulations to ensure fairness e.g. monopolistic or protectionist practices. The problem with our elected meps is that 1/3rd are ukip who either dont turn up or maliciously vote against uk best interests e.g they voted AGAINST us getting the rebate.
2. The eu gets the best trade deal within the restrictions of the wto. They will insert mfn clauses etc and more negotiating tactics by virtue of the fact they are the biggest gorilla in the room. Saying we will get a better deal if we left is just another unjustified clam by the leave campaign...
...and we are picking up the phone and trading with the rest of the world everyday, its working just fine thanks

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View snytaxx's Profile snytaxx Flag London 29 May 16 4.26pm Send a Private Message to snytaxx Add snytaxx as a friend

Originally posted by JohnyBoy

1. We elect mep's do we not? And if its traded in the eu i dont have a problem that there are rules and regulations to ensure fairness e.g. monopolistic or protectionist practices. The problem with our elected meps is that 1/3rd are ukip who either dont turn up or maliciously vote against uk best interests e.g they voted AGAINST us getting the rebate.
2. The eu gets the best trade deal within the restrictions of the wto. They will insert mfn clauses etc and more negotiating tactics by virtue of the fact they are the biggest gorilla in the room. Saying we will get a better deal if we left is just another unjustified clam by the leave campaign...
...and we are picking up the phone and trading with the rest of the world everyday, its working just fine thanks

1. Yes of course, but the executive isn't, they propose the legislation. If we are just relying on our MEP's (which you have already pointed out as doing a piss poor job) to just block legislation until we get something that suits us as a good system of governance, i'm afraid you are living in cloud cuckoo land. Your argument is that the system is broken because 'we' the British people are too stupid to vote the way which suits brussels - oh brilliant. Thats the democracy issue sewn up then.

2. Says who? The EU? Where is the benchmark? There is none, because we dont have one because we can't trade deal ourself. You've just accused the leave group of making an unjustified claim then dropped a whopper yourself.

Tell me, hows the EU - Canada trade deal coming along? Is it done yet?

How is the EU - Australia deal done yet too?

Could you link me to the EU - China deal?

But its okay, just keep telling everyone its all going fine, nothing to see here, at least at the EU -( insert country X) trade deal signing ceremony anyway.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View JohnyBoy's Profile JohnyBoy Flag 29 May 16 4.42pm Send a Private Message to JohnyBoy Add JohnyBoy as a friend

Originally posted by snytaxx

1. Yes of course, but the executive isn't, they propose the legislation. If we are just relying on our MEP's (which you have already pointed out as doing a piss poor job) to just block legislation until we get something that suits us as a good system of governance, i'm afraid you are living in cloud cuckoo land. Your argument is that the system is broken because 'we' the British people are too stupid to vote the way which suits brussels - oh brilliant. Thats the democracy issue sewn up then.

2. Says who? The EU? Where is the benchmark? There is none, because we dont have one because we can't trade deal ourself. You've just accused the leave group of making an unjustified claim then dropped a whopper yourself.

Tell me, hows the EU - Canada trade deal coming along? Is it done yet?

How is the EU - Australia deal done yet too?

Could you link me to the EU - China deal?

But its okay, just keep telling everyone its all going fine, nothing to see here, at least at the EU -( insert country X) trade deal signing ceremony anyway.

So its cloud cookoo land t say that ukip has the worst attendance record out of 700+ parties? Or that they voted against us getting the rebate? Cos they are both true...and yes the british public must share responsibility for electing these meps who 70k+ a year...and then dont turn up!!!
And if you have ever been involved in significant deals the largest player usually/always inserts an mfn clause, so that suppliers cant then go to smaller operators that could make their business/businesses less competitive. This aint cookoo land its the real world.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View snytaxx's Profile snytaxx Flag London 29 May 16 5.01pm Send a Private Message to snytaxx Add snytaxx as a friend

Originally posted by JohnyBoy

So its cloud cookoo land t say that ukip has the worst attendance record out of 700+ parties? Or that they voted against us getting the rebate? Cos they are both true...and yes the british public must share responsibility for electing these meps who 70k+ a year...and then dont turn up!!!
And if you have ever been involved in significant deals the largest player usually/always inserts an mfn clause, so that suppliers cant then go to smaller operators that could make their business/businesses less competitive. This aint cookoo land its the real world.

I'm not here to defend, UKIP, I don't care what happens to them or any other MEP, my issue is that you seem intent to just keep blaming the electorate for why the system isn't working. This is the whole issue with the EU and why it loses / refuses to address its really sketchy democratic record. If anyone takes issue with its structure, they just turn around and say, "oh no, its not our fault our system of government doesn't fit your local populace, its their fault they don't fit into our imposed system of doing things". Literally shocking behaviour.

When China and Australia signed their FTA last year, the Chinese didn't say "oh no Australia, we here in China are bigger than everyone else meaning you can only trade with us".

China and Australia now have a fully functioning FTA which allows 95% tariff free trade, millions of dollars of mutual trade and thousands of working holiday visa's for ordinary Chinese citizens with the skills Australia needs. Can we have that? I'm still waiting for your link...

Nope your solution is to rely on big man brussels, the head of a trade bloc that hasn't grown economically in 10 years to just bully our way in trade negotiation while still thinking we run the world.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View JohnyBoy's Profile JohnyBoy Flag 29 May 16 5.36pm Send a Private Message to JohnyBoy Add JohnyBoy as a friend

Originally posted by snytaxx

I'm not here to defend, UKIP, I don't care what happens to them or any other MEP, my issue is that you seem intent to just keep blaming the electorate for why the system isn't working. This is the whole issue with the EU and why it loses / refuses to address its really sketchy democratic record. If anyone takes issue with its structure, they just turn around and say, "oh no, its not our fault our system of government doesn't fit your local populace, its their fault they don't fit into our imposed system of doing things". Literally shocking behaviour.

When China and Australia signed their FTA last year, the Chinese didn't say "oh no Australia, we here in China are bigger than everyone else meaning you can only trade with us".

China and Australia now have a fully functioning FTA which allows 95% tariff free trade, millions of dollars of mutual trade and thousands of working holiday visa's for ordinary Chinese citizens with the skills Australia needs. Can we have that? I'm still waiting for your link...

Nope your solution is to rely on big man brussels, the head of a trade bloc that hasn't grown economically in 10 years to just bully our way in trade negotiation while still thinking we run the world.

With respect, it does sound like you at
are defending UKIP policy as the core/leadership position of every other major political party except DUP and respect is to remain...unless you are one of those rebel torys who, as John Major put it, is in danger of morphing into ukip.
And it has been a wake up call for us all to pay more attention to european elections, not my 'solution' but i would like to see more centrist and leftist representation, or maybe just representative that would vote in the interests of the uk, or is that me just being idealistic...but whatever happens, to suggest that in the event of brexit we will somehow magic a slew of new business and negotiate quick tarrif free deals with the rest of the world is equally idealistic

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View snytaxx's Profile snytaxx Flag London 29 May 16 5.56pm Send a Private Message to snytaxx Add snytaxx as a friend

Originally posted by JohnyBoy

With respect, it does sound like you at
are defending UKIP policy as the core/leadership position of every other major political party except DUP and respect is to remain...unless you are one of those rebel torys who, as John Major put it, is in danger of morphing into ukip.
And it has been a wake up call for us all to pay more attention to european elections, not my 'solution' but i would like to see more centrist and leftist representation, or maybe just representative that would vote in the interests of the uk, or is that me just being idealistic...but whatever happens, to suggest that in the event of brexit we will somehow magic a slew of new business and negotiate quick tarrif free deals with the rest of the world is equally idealistic

It's a fundamental mistake to assume that those who will vote for Brexit are solely from right of centre parties. As can be seen from my sparring with Gusset, the EU is alot more vulnerable from attacks from the left of the political spectrum than it is from the right.

Again, I won't berate your political ideology, if a central left approach is what you want, then go and vote for it, no criticism here, but the notion this can only be found at European level is not true.

As for trade deal scenario, its key that both sides own up to their risks. As a Brexiteer, I will be the first to admit leaving has risks, but so does staying and its very important the remain camp are clear about these risks.

The beauty of our country is it has special relationships and soft power levels which some other countries in Europe can only dream about. I can't talk for all other countries here, but being an international student in China, i've quickly realised just how much the Chinese love 'us - the British' and how badly they want to buy into all things British. The potential for post Brexit UK to tap into two of the worlds largest economies of which we are held in high regard is almost limitless, why should we give other countries a veto on that relationship?

FYI, my last post for the night. Thanks for playing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View JohnyBoy's Profile JohnyBoy Flag 29 May 16 6.36pm Send a Private Message to JohnyBoy Add JohnyBoy as a friend

Originally posted by snytaxx

It's a fundamental mistake to assume that those who will vote for Brexit are solely from right of centre parties. As can be seen from my sparring with Gusset, the EU is alot more vulnerable from attacks from the left of the political spectrum than it is from the right.

Again, I won't berate your political ideology, if a central left approach is what you want, then go and vote for it, no criticism here, but the notion this can only be found at European level is not true.

As for trade deal scenario, its key that both sides own up to their risks. As a Brexiteer, I will be the first to admit leaving has risks, but so does staying and its very important the remain camp are clear about these risks.

The beauty of our country is it has special relationships and soft power levels which some other countries in Europe can only dream about. I can't talk for all other countries here, but being an international student in China, i've quickly realised just how much the Chinese love 'us - the British' and how badly they want to buy into all things British. The potential for post Brexit UK to tap into two of the worlds largest economies of which we are held in high regard is almost limitless, why should we give other countries a veto on that relationship?

FYI, my last post for the night. Thanks for playing.

Yep good debate syntaxx.....btw centre/left is not necessarily my political ideology and i take your point re China but i think we are trading just fine as it is, Germany now exports 10% of its trade to china, brexit would not make it better necessarily for either.
Most on here will breathe a sigh of relief cos i am signing off for a whole week, going on hols tomorrow, so intend to not even look at a newspaper during that time, let alone the HOL.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 29 May 16 6.38pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Has it really come to this?

3543.jpg Attachment: 3543.jpg (74.01Kb)

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 102 of 2586 < 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic