You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > London Mayoral Elections
April 23 2024 10.34am

London Mayoral Elections

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

 

View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 06 Apr 16 2.29pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by matt_himself

I would like Khan to win because it would be a timely reminder before the next general election of how much damage an extremist Labour administration can create in a short period of time.

I don't like reminders that last for at least 4 years.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View DanH's Profile DanH Flag SW2 06 Apr 16 2.33pm Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by matt_himself

I would like Khan to win because it would be a timely reminder before the next general election of how much damage an extremist Labour administration can create in a short period of time.


Calm yourself down Matthew.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 06 Apr 16 2.53pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Originally posted by DanH


Calm yourself down Matthew.

Khan keeps some very interesting company, Daniel:

[Link]

Vote for him at your peril.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 06 Apr 16 7.23pm

But seemingly it is no peril that Mr G's interesting company includes the current Mayor (with whom of course Mr G has shared a platform) who is recorded by BBC News website as follows:

"a 2002 article in which Mr Johnson referred to the Queen being greeted in Commonwealth countries by "flag-waving piccaninnies".

... claimed he also said that he expected, during a mooted visit by Tony Blair to the Congo, that "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief".


Edited by legaleagle (06 Apr 2016 7.25pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View rob1969's Profile rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 06 Apr 16 8.20pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

But seemingly it is no peril that Mr G's interesting company includes the current Mayor (with whom of course Mr G has shared a platform) who is recorded by BBC News website as follows:

"a 2002 article in which Mr Johnson referred to the Queen being greeted in Commonwealth countries by "flag-waving piccaninnies".

... claimed he also said that he expected, during a mooted visit by Tony Blair to the Congo, that "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief".


Edited by legaleagle (06 Apr 2016 7.25pm)

Your point is what - guilt by association ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 06 Apr 16 8.44pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

But seemingly it is no peril that Mr G's interesting company includes the current Mayor (with whom of course Mr G has shared a platform) who is recorded by BBC News website as follows:

"a 2002 article in which Mr Johnson referred to the Queen being greeted in Commonwealth countries by "flag-waving piccaninnies".

... claimed he also said that he expected, during a mooted visit by Tony Blair to the Congo, that "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief".


Edited by legaleagle (06 Apr 2016 7.25pm)

Come back with a cogent argument. The weakest of weak arguments.

Look at this 'Legal' - do you agree with his politics?

[Link]

Bet you don't. Especially the bit that 'homosexuality is unnatural'.

Edited by matt_himself (06 Apr 2016 9.49pm)

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View -TUX-'s Profile -TUX- Flag Alphabettispaghetti 06 Apr 16 9.58pm Send a Private Message to -TUX- Add -TUX- as a friend

Bring back Boris.
It's an irrelevant position in the grand scheme of things but at least, to the masses, he brought humour.
Job done.

 


Time to move forward together.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 06 Apr 16 10.20pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by -TUX-

Bring back Boris.
It's an irrelevant position in the grand scheme of things but at least, to the masses, he brought humour.
Job done.

In a nutshell.

Instead we're going to have a pair of c***s either side of his tenure.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 06 Apr 16 11.46pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

Come back with a cogent argument. The weakest of weak arguments.

Look at this 'Legal' - do you agree with his politics?

[Link]

Bet you don't. Especially the bit that 'homosexuality is unnatural'.

Edited by matt_himself (06 Apr 2016 9.49pm)

You appear to find a perfectly rational point to not be cogent on the seeming basis that its a view you don't share.

My point was a simple one: If you are going to say don't vote for someone on the basis of someone they know/shared a platform with being unpalatable,be consistent and even handed,rather than simply biased.

If you shouldn't vote for Khan because he shared a platform with someone who has expressed some dodgy views,also don't vote for Mr G who has associated with and shed a platform with Boris,someone who has expressed dodgy views.

I certainly don't agree with the Imam's views.I am aware Khan has been the subject of criticism from "extremist" elements within the UK Islamist community for his pro gay rights stance.The East London Advertiser,reporting a public meeting in 2008:

"The leader of the British wing of Hizb ut-Tahrir was applauded as he called on Muslims to work outside the political system and concentrate on grass roots initiatives such as building madrassas and mosques.

He also attacked Muslim MPs including Sadiq Khan for voting for gay rights and failing to defend Muslim Sharia laws."

Anyone who has been following the campaign closely can see the Tories have been trying to taint Khan with the "extremist" card as a political smear to try and deter voters for some time.That should be seen for the nonsense it is,regardless of his personal merits or otherwise as a candidate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 06 Apr 16 11.54pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

You appear to find a perfectly rational point to not be cogent on the seeming basis that its a view you don't share.

My point was a simple one: If you are going to say don't vote for someone on the basis of someone they know/shared a platform with being unpalatable,be consistent and even handed,rather than simply biased.

If you shouldn't vote for Khan because he shared a platform with someone who has expressed some dodgy views,also don't vote for Mr G who has associated with and shed a platform with Boris,someone who has expressed dodgy views.

I certainly don't agree with the Imam's views.I am aware Khan has been the subject of criticism from "extremist" elements within the UK Islamist community for his pro gay rights stance.The East London Advertiser,reporting a public meeting in 2008:

"The leader of the British wing of Hizb ut-Tahrir was applauded as he called on Muslims to work outside the political system and concentrate on grass roots initiatives such as building madrassas and mosques.

He also attacked Muslim MPs including Sadiq Khan for voting for gay rights and failing to defend Muslim Sharia laws."

Anyone who has been following the campaign closely can see the Tories have been trying to taint Khan with the "extremist" card as a political smear to try and deter voters for some time.That should be seen for the nonsense it is,regardless of his personal merits or otherwise as a candidate.

So, you think Khan is trustworthy? Yes or no?

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 07 Apr 16 8.31am

As trustworthy/untrustworthy as any prominent politician.......and,if it comes to the pinch,IMO more trustworthy than,I use the tube often but in fact don't know Holborn is the stop after Tottenham Ct Rd going E on the Central Line, Mr G or for that matter,multiple time wife cheater,Mr J.

Edited by legaleagle (07 Apr 2016 8.42am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 07 Apr 16 8.37am

Duplicate.apologies

Edited by legaleagle (07 Apr 2016 8.38am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > London Mayoral Elections