Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
Stuk Top half 06 Apr 16 2.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
I would like Khan to win because it would be a timely reminder before the next general election of how much damage an extremist Labour administration can create in a short period of time. I don't like reminders that last for at least 4 years.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 06 Apr 16 2.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
I would like Khan to win because it would be a timely reminder before the next general election of how much damage an extremist Labour administration can create in a short period of time.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 06 Apr 16 2.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Khan keeps some very interesting company, Daniel: Vote for him at your peril.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 06 Apr 16 7.23pm | |
---|---|
But seemingly it is no peril that Mr G's interesting company includes the current Mayor (with whom of course Mr G has shared a platform) who is recorded by BBC News website as follows: "a 2002 article in which Mr Johnson referred to the Queen being greeted in Commonwealth countries by "flag-waving piccaninnies". ... claimed he also said that he expected, during a mooted visit by Tony Blair to the Congo, that "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief".
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rob1969 Banstead Surrey 06 Apr 16 8.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
But seemingly it is no peril that Mr G's interesting company includes the current Mayor (with whom of course Mr G has shared a platform) who is recorded by BBC News website as follows: "a 2002 article in which Mr Johnson referred to the Queen being greeted in Commonwealth countries by "flag-waving piccaninnies". ... claimed he also said that he expected, during a mooted visit by Tony Blair to the Congo, that "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief".
Your point is what - guilt by association ?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 06 Apr 16 8.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
But seemingly it is no peril that Mr G's interesting company includes the current Mayor (with whom of course Mr G has shared a platform) who is recorded by BBC News website as follows: "a 2002 article in which Mr Johnson referred to the Queen being greeted in Commonwealth countries by "flag-waving piccaninnies". ... claimed he also said that he expected, during a mooted visit by Tony Blair to the Congo, that "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief".
Come back with a cogent argument. The weakest of weak arguments. Look at this 'Legal' - do you agree with his politics? Bet you don't. Especially the bit that 'homosexuality is unnatural'. Edited by matt_himself (06 Apr 2016 9.49pm)
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
-TUX- Alphabettispaghetti 06 Apr 16 9.58pm | |
---|---|
Bring back Boris.
Time to move forward together. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 06 Apr 16 10.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by -TUX-
Bring back Boris. In a nutshell. Instead we're going to have a pair of c***s either side of his tenure.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 06 Apr 16 11.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Come back with a cogent argument. The weakest of weak arguments. Look at this 'Legal' - do you agree with his politics? Bet you don't. Especially the bit that 'homosexuality is unnatural'. Edited by matt_himself (06 Apr 2016 9.49pm) You appear to find a perfectly rational point to not be cogent on the seeming basis that its a view you don't share. My point was a simple one: If you are going to say don't vote for someone on the basis of someone they know/shared a platform with being unpalatable,be consistent and even handed,rather than simply biased. If you shouldn't vote for Khan because he shared a platform with someone who has expressed some dodgy views,also don't vote for Mr G who has associated with and shed a platform with Boris,someone who has expressed dodgy views. I certainly don't agree with the Imam's views.I am aware Khan has been the subject of criticism from "extremist" elements within the UK Islamist community for his pro gay rights stance.The East London Advertiser,reporting a public meeting in 2008: "The leader of the British wing of Hizb ut-Tahrir was applauded as he called on Muslims to work outside the political system and concentrate on grass roots initiatives such as building madrassas and mosques. He also attacked Muslim MPs including Sadiq Khan for voting for gay rights and failing to defend Muslim Sharia laws." Anyone who has been following the campaign closely can see the Tories have been trying to taint Khan with the "extremist" card as a political smear to try and deter voters for some time.That should be seen for the nonsense it is,regardless of his personal merits or otherwise as a candidate.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 06 Apr 16 11.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
You appear to find a perfectly rational point to not be cogent on the seeming basis that its a view you don't share. My point was a simple one: If you are going to say don't vote for someone on the basis of someone they know/shared a platform with being unpalatable,be consistent and even handed,rather than simply biased. If you shouldn't vote for Khan because he shared a platform with someone who has expressed some dodgy views,also don't vote for Mr G who has associated with and shed a platform with Boris,someone who has expressed dodgy views. I certainly don't agree with the Imam's views.I am aware Khan has been the subject of criticism from "extremist" elements within the UK Islamist community for his pro gay rights stance.The East London Advertiser,reporting a public meeting in 2008: "The leader of the British wing of Hizb ut-Tahrir was applauded as he called on Muslims to work outside the political system and concentrate on grass roots initiatives such as building madrassas and mosques. He also attacked Muslim MPs including Sadiq Khan for voting for gay rights and failing to defend Muslim Sharia laws." Anyone who has been following the campaign closely can see the Tories have been trying to taint Khan with the "extremist" card as a political smear to try and deter voters for some time.That should be seen for the nonsense it is,regardless of his personal merits or otherwise as a candidate.
So, you think Khan is trustworthy? Yes or no?
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 07 Apr 16 8.31am | |
---|---|
As trustworthy/untrustworthy as any prominent politician.......and,if it comes to the pinch,IMO more trustworthy than,I use the tube often but in fact don't know Holborn is the stop after Tottenham Ct Rd going E on the Central Line, Mr G or for that matter,multiple time wife cheater,Mr J. Edited by legaleagle (07 Apr 2016 8.42am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 07 Apr 16 8.37am | |
---|---|
Duplicate.apologies Edited by legaleagle (07 Apr 2016 8.38am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.