Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
thegreatlardino crawley/selsey 14 Apr 16 11.02am | |
---|---|
funny enough there is an article about this in the current private eye, was known about for ages...answers on a postcard to why it wasnt run earlier but the daily mail article seems about right..also according the the eye the female concerned offered a more esoteric adult experience to her clients
They're justified, and they're ancient |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Apr 16 11.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hoof Hearted
On the radio this morning they said she was a Dominatrix. Often that term gets mixed up with Dominants. Dominatrix has sexual interaction with her clients, where as a pro-dom is purely about the BDSM play. Presumably its the former, but technically if its the latter, its not even prostitution (which in itself is only compromising because of a prudishness in society anyhow). It seems you can f**k whoever you want, but if you pay someone for sex, you're vulnerable to being 'compromised' somehow. Seems unfair to me.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sportyteacher London 14 Apr 16 11.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Everyone pays for sex, one way or another. Brilliant! So true.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 17 Apr 16 7.18am | |
---|---|
The more I read about him, the more I admire:
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.