BBC (again)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Badger11  Beckenham 12 Jan 23 8.13am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
Sadly it's not news. Black people do not want to be blood or organ donors for whatever reason so this impacts those in need. I am a blood donor of many years it's funny you don't see much diversity maybe BLM should complain.
One more point |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| YT Oxford 12 Jan 23 8.17am |
|
|---|---|
|
Perhaps the headline ought to have been: Organ transplants: black people only have themselves to blame.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
PalazioVecchio  south pole 12 Jan 23 4.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by YT
Perhaps the headline ought to have been: Organ transplants: black people only have themselves to blame.
Victimhood, and how pointing the finger at everybody else doesn't always work. Black Transplant-list Lives Matter.
Eze Peasy at Anfield.... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 12 Jan 23 5.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I think they’re too busy with voodoo and cutting and shutting young girls privates to worry about organ donation.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Eaglecoops CR3 12 Jan 23 5.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
How do you justify this claim? That you disagree with the views you perceive are portrayed on the BBC doesn’t give you the right to make such a declaration. It’s not a tax! The licence fee is to support the provision of all live broadcasting in the UK. Opting out means others, many of whom depend on it, including those who are old that you feign sympathy for, must pay more. Should your approach become more widespread then either the quality changes or the method of funding must. Neither of which is what I, or I believe most people, want. Do you never watch anything on iPlayer either? So if you are unwilling to change your approach I wish the BBC much success in their efforts. If that means giving them enhanced regulatory powers then let that happen. All but the poorest ought all share the cost of providing a public service that is so valuable and free of government interference. Having debates over balance is a separate issue. Either way, fee or tax it should be purely optional. I certainly do not want to pay for the rubbish they produce. If it’s as good as you think it is, then they would have no worries about becoming an optional service. They no longer show decent sport. They no longer make decent tv series. There are less and less documentaries. They have ruined favourite shows like Top Gear and a question of sport. Comedy is now not funny because it’s not allowed to be. I’m really not sure what you are paying for. The Government should be funding the education side of the business, the rest should live or die on the quality of the programmes. I don’t see enough quality these days to warrant a fee or tax at all.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 13 Jan 23 7.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
You could see the disappointment in the BBC reporters' faces as they covered this story on the news today: BBC News - UK economy beats expectations with November growth
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 georgenorman 14 Jan 23 9.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
I see the BBC has launched a podcast that gives a voice to the Islamic terrorist, Shamima Begum, that basically says that she is just a naughty girl.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 14 Jan 23 9.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
I see the BBC has launched a podcast that gives a voice to the Islamic terrorist, Shamima Begum, that basically says that she is just a naughty girl. I have no intention of listening to it but I do want to know what type of podcast it is. If they are not going to ask her hard questions about her terrorist activities then this program should never have been made because it is just a PR stunt at the taxpayers expense. Coming up next an in depth conversation with Vladimir Putin "So Vlad, you don't mind if I call you that? What's your favourite colour."
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 14 Jan 23 9.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
This made me smile US is renaming certain places because they are deemed to be offensive. I don't care but I smiled because nowhere does the BBC name them so as a news report it is not a good read as you have to guess what they were. Squaw Valley? It's a bit like those police reports where they ask the public to be on the lookout but don't mention race or gender, kinda pointless.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| georgenorman 14 Jan 23 9.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
I have no intention of listening to it but I do want to know what type of podcast it is. If they are not going to ask her hard questions about her terrorist activities then this program should never have been made because it is just a PR stunt at the taxpayers expense. Coming up next an in depth conversation with Vladimir Putin "So Vlad, you don't mind if I call you that? What's your favourite colour." Next could be Anjem Choudary on Strictly Come Dancing.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 14 Jan 23 9.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Next could be Anjem Choudary on Strictly Come Dancing. Nah he wouldn't be very good, I'm sure he'd bomb.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 14 Jan 23 10.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
In Canada they are renaming the brownies aged 7-9 as this is offensive apparently.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.