Who speaks for the unborn?

Most just look the other way.

I reckon the nips should adopt Hungary's native child payment approach....which has been working quite successfully.

They have to change some cultural issues with getting the sexes together as well....too much separation.

The global corporates and governments want Japan to accept foreigners because they know its different approach has stood out as a success story.

The native Japanese need to fight them....literally or they will lose all they value.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Jan 2021 2.23pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

what scares me about Japan is that all the rest of the West seems to be going in the same direction.

you fail to reproduce, you go extinct. Then you get colonised from the Third World.

There are whole towns in Italy that have been abandoned by italians and re-populated with newcomers.

The newcomers have sky-high rates of fertility, while the italian women are having abortions.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (04 Jan 2021 3.21pm)

Eze Peasy at Anfield....

A fact-checking site that says most of the claims are 'misleading'.

In other words, in most cases, the law provides all those possibilities stated and just places the decision into the clinics and professionals....'trust them' basically.

If these possibilities weren't being made possible then the laws would never have required changing.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Jan 2021 2.59pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Abortion.

we are all told that we must respect the Woman's right to choose.

i know 3 fellas who had unwanted pregnancies foisted upon them against their wishes.

And 2 other fellas whose girlfriend had abortions without consulting these men....against their will....in the style of Michael Corleone in the Godfather.

Pro-Choice is actually Pro women's choice.

Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Ok most claims are misleading that is fine then , it does say that the claims abortion will be on demand are false, and claims NO legal requirement: that babies born alive after an abortion are given medical support are false. It also says NO legal requirement: to give pain relief for babies aborted after 20 weeks, omits important context because ‘there is no scientific evidence that the fetus is capable of feeling pain before around 24 weeks’
This legislation looks like it is updating legislation from 1961 in social policy terms fairly old ,’ that legislation made abortions only explicitly allowed for abortions on disability grounds before 20 weeks’ In practice abortions have been available for women in later term pregnancy and ‘many abortions were done for congenital abnormalities (disabilities) post 20 weeks under the circumstances that they would cause serious problems for the mental health of the mother. ‘
That now will only happen if two qualified health care professionals agree, these health care professionals will need to meet the legal, ethical and professional standards set by their professions. I assume the New Zealand medical authorities are writing up or have guidelines for the criteria needed to meet for post 20-week abortions. If it does include allowance for abortions on the grounds of sex, cleft palate or I’ve changed my mind then I’ll happily get my placard and come with you to protest
Yes, to some extent we do need to trust the Doctors and medical authorities to act with integrity, I also hope there would be accountability and transparency in decision making. Of course, I’ll also trust the New Zealand people to hold the parliament and authorities to account and use their power of protest and vote in the next election if late term abortions are being given on demand for spurious reasons.
As I say it looks like they are updating old legislation but the headline ‘New Zealand passes legislation to better aligns the regulation of abortion services with other health services, and modernises the legal framework of abortion provided by the Crimes Act 1961 and the Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion Act 1977 (CSA Act 1977).’ Might not get the same visceral reaction which was the point I made originally , the story is being spun to make you feel horrified and react emotively , if a story does that then taking time to check it out is the sensible response.

One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A

town's get old and die, when not enough kids are born.

[Link]

Eze Peasy at Anfield....