Hodgson could not even be bothered to fill the bench up with the requisite nine subs. Why did he not put a couple of the under 23's on there?? We all know he does not have any interest in blooding young players, but this borders on arrogance. I do often think this gentlemanly image he portrays is a complete facade. I remember seeing that clip of him talking to that reporter when he was West Brom manager and it was totally out of order, even if it was a silly question. I'm sick of his negativity, always picking his same favourites, never trying different tactics and the late substitutions. Anyone else falling out of love with the club?

This isn't a reason though, right? U23s main aim is to develop players well enough to be part of the first team.

If an opportunity arises at the last minute, you don't hold players opportunity back because you have a game.

But surely giving them premiership experience on match day even if unused subs is better than leaving them at home and having only 7 subs ?

Travelling with the first team and continuing to forge relationships, being involved in andhearing the match-day team talks, integration into dressing room, learning game plans and how change of tactics occur under the first team coaches - esentially being on the inside and learning about the game day logistics.

How does that plus many other factors I haven't mentioned/don't know about not benefit a young player and their development?

Also, it would instil confidence into the players that are called upon.

We could have 70 subs and used all of them, and still got hammered.

I think all prem teams have to keep there squads separate due to C19.