Can We Play 3 At The Back?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Palace Passion  Bromley, South London 20 Jul 22 9.56am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Have we got what it takes to play 3 at the back with wing backs? Richards---Andersen---Guehi Clyne---Doucoure---Eze---Mitchell Olise------Edouard------Zaha
|||||||||||P|A|L|A|C|E||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Hrolf The Ganger 20 Jul 22 10.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
No. What we do need is a better winger than Ayew and cover for Mitchell. If we signed two quality wing backs, then three at the back is an option. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (20 Jul 2022 10.05am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MrRobbo Purley 20 Jul 22 10.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
No for me at the moment. Our fullbacks aren't attacking enough. And I'd want to continue with 3 in the midfield to give Eze some freedom
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Lanzo-Ad  Lanzarote 20 Jul 22 10.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
No, but if we did it would be 3-5-2, to protect a lead.
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 20 Jul 22 11.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
I wouldn't fancy it with Ward/Mitchell/Clyne, plus the fact that we don't have many centre backs either. My guess is that Ward would be one of the three if we did do it.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MonsterMunch Cambridge 20 Jul 22 12.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Palace Passion
Have we got what it takes to play 3 at the back with wing backs? Richards---Andersen---Guehi Clyne---Doucoure---Eze---Mitchell Olise------Edouard------Zaha As many have said. Going forward is not our full backs strength. Adaramola could fit I think.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 20 Jul 22 1.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Yes of course we can, but probably not with any success.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dixie Eagle Chatham 20 Jul 22 3.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It didn't go well vs Chelsea in the FA Cup semi-final.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| TheBigToePunt 20 Jul 22 5.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
If we sign either Richards or Colwill then we will have the centre backs to play with a back three. I also feel that Ayew might make a good right wingback - I know he's not a specialist in that position but he's a very hard working winger that tracks back well, and if Mitchell plays on the opposite flank then Vieira will have the option of switching between a back three and a back four during games, which he wouldn't have if Ward or Clyne played on the right. The problem is that a back three system makes it very hard to fit Olise, Eze and Wilf in the same team. I can't see Eze playing in a two man centre midfield - not unless Doucoure is some sort of superhero - and I doubt Wilf will play centre forward, so one of them will sit out, which seems like a bad idea.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Palace Passion Bromley, South London 21 Jul 22 8.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I can actually see it working with Richards in the back 3...
|||||||||||P|A|L|A|C|E||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Elpis Online In a pub 22 Jul 22 6.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
We have numerous wingers in the squad that would become obsolete in a 352 system .That along with not having ANY natural wing back types would make playing that formation ,for me , a nonsense . Its a formation I like ,but you need the right players and we dont have them .
And we still need a striker |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 22 Jul 22 8.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Elpis
We have numerous wingers in the squad that would become obsolete in a 352 system .That along with not having ANY natural wing back types would make playing that formation ,for me , a nonsense . Its a formation I like ,but you need the right players and we dont have them .
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.