You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!
March 19 2024 3.04am

Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 11 of 13 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

 

View effingham's Profile effingham Flag 18 Apr 14 6.21pm Send a Private Message to effingham Add effingham as a friend

Of course he is....providing he's not putting his family at risk

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View bexleydave's Profile bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 6.23pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 5.40pm

Quote glazedallover at 18 Apr 2014 5.24pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 5.20pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 18 Apr 2014 1.12pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am


Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.

Once again, HE DID NOT GO TO THE AUTHORITIES the sad little s*** went running off to OGS. Not the same thing.

It doesn't matter who DF went to Gogh, the fact is he reported it somewhere. so the ends the same. Understand now?

Bollox. If he didn't report it to the league, he should have escalated it within Bolton.

telling a 'mate' or anyone else for that matter is not "Reporting" it.

Telling anyone is divulging the facts, no matter who it is you are telling. The idea is to prevent cover-ups. When this goes further the likes of SE25 and the rest will get it. If the league make a ruling that neither party or either party agrees with they can take the league to court over the decision if they believe it transvenes any law, Now my bet is Tan will take this to court once the league decides Palace have no case to answer. After all, Tan is proving that desperate. Then anyone who is known to be involved will be asked to tell all. Those who do not declare honestly what they know will then be seen to withholding information, or even abetting. Those who truly think the above scenario is not possible or likely need to look back at sport in general and soccer in particular. Hopefully I hope this puts my side to this to rest and I pray nothing of what I've said, occurs.


WTF does that mean; were you thinking of 'contravenes'?

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Crystal_Clear's Profile Crystal_Clear Flag Belfast 18 Apr 14 6.24pm Send a Private Message to Crystal_Clear Add Crystal_Clear as a friend

If a member of the Cardiff staff was stupid enough to give away the team, then surely that is their internal problem.

If someone from Palace had broken into their offices to steal the team info then that would be different.

I mean, Sunderland fielded an eligible player for 4 matches and only got a fine.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View glazedallover's Profile glazedallover Flag Allier 18 Apr 14 6.53pm Send a Private Message to glazedallover Add glazedallover as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 5.56pm


Thankyou for your intelligent response, Glazed.


I keep reading your posts and still fail to find anything intelligent. Plenty of self important poppycock. You related to willo?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View adrian b's Profile adrian b Flag Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 7.06pm Send a Private Message to adrian b Add adrian b as a friend


Yes contravenes, Bexley. Grammar out of the way, your views on whether you think, really believe, Tan is a sane man who will not go a step further to try to make his point. Some on this site seem to think this is rubbish and tan isn't that sort. I don't mind that as long as they can put forward a reasoned argument. Some are finding it hard. Pity, great site.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View bexleydave's Profile bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 7.20pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 7.06pm


Yes contravenes, Bexley. Grammar out of the way, your views on whether you think, really believe, Tan is a sane man who will not go a step further to try to make his point. Some on this site seem to think this is rubbish and tan isn't that sort. I don't mind that as long as they can put forward a reasoned argument. Some are finding it hard. Pity, great site.


If that Malaysian meglomaniac decides to take some form of action in the courts, against any decision the EPL may make on his complaint, it will be between him and the EPL. No one (Freedman, Moody, Pulis, CPFC2010 or anyone else) can be charged with perverting the course of justice (in its many forms) relating to anything that happened before the commencement of a police investigation, charges being bought or the commencement of a court case. That's my last word on the subject as I'm already repeating what I've already said perfectly clearly.

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View adrian b's Profile adrian b Flag Landrindod, Wales 18 Apr 14 7.23pm Send a Private Message to adrian b Add adrian b as a friend

Great stuff Bex. I hope Tan takes it further, loses everything and fcuks of to where he comes from. AMEN

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View 7@burnley79's Profile 7@burnley79 Flag Battersea 18 Apr 14 7.52pm Send a Private Message to 7@burnley79 Add 7@burnley79 as a friend

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 7.20pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 7.06pm


Yes contravenes, Bexley. Grammar out of the way, your views on whether you think, really believe, Tan is a sane man who will not go a step further to try to make his point. Some on this site seem to think this is rubbish and tan isn't that sort. I don't mind that as long as they can put forward a reasoned argument. Some are finding it hard. Pity, great site.


If that Malaysian meglomaniac decides to take some form of action in the courts, against any decision the EPL may make on his complaint, it will be between him and the EPL. No one (Freedman, Moody, Pulis, CPFC2010 or anyone else) can be charged with perverting the course of justice (in its many forms) relating to anything that happened before the commencement of a police investigation, charges being bought or the commencement of a court case. That's my last word on the subject as I'm already repeating what I've already said perfectly clearly.

Dave, I have a court case coming up can you represent?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View bexleydave's Profile bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 8.28pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

Quote 7@burnley79 at 18 Apr 2014 7.52pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 7.20pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 7.06pm


Yes contravenes, Bexley. Grammar out of the way, your views on whether you think, really believe, Tan is a sane man who will not go a step further to try to make his point. Some on this site seem to think this is rubbish and tan isn't that sort. I don't mind that as long as they can put forward a reasoned argument. Some are finding it hard. Pity, great site.


If that Malaysian meglomaniac decides to take some form of action in the courts, against any decision the EPL may make on his complaint, it will be between him and the EPL. No one (Freedman, Moody, Pulis, CPFC2010 or anyone else) can be charged with perverting the course of justice (in its many forms) relating to anything that happened before the commencement of a police investigation, charges being bought or the commencement of a court case. That's my last word on the subject as I'm already repeating what I've already said perfectly clearly.

Dave, I have a court case coming up can you represent?


In a past life I have presented many cases for my employer at the County Court, Employment Tribunals and pension scheme medical appeals and have also represented many individuals at disciplinary hearings (with my trades union hat on). I've spent a lot of time, in the past, working with both lawyers and doctors and you pick stuff up. Good luck with the court case

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dbob26's Profile dbob26 Flag beckenham 18 Apr 14 8.36pm Send a Private Message to dbob26 Add dbob26 as a friend

I havnt read the last ten pages of posts, but how on earth can Dougie Freedman be the link, how did he get the Cardiff teamsheet in the first place ? Let Tan have his two minutes of straw clutching and then let us celebrate staying in the league, against everyones odds !

Alan Hansen...up yours

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eagleboi's Profile eagleboi Flag Catford 18 Apr 14 8.42pm Send a Private Message to eagleboi Add eagleboi as a friend

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 5.40pm

Quote glazedallover at 18 Apr 2014 5.24pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 5.20pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 18 Apr 2014 1.12pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am


Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.

Once again, HE DID NOT GO TO THE AUTHORITIES the sad little s*** went running off to OGS. Not the same thing.

It doesn't matter who DF went to Gogh, the fact is he reported it somewhere. so the ends the same. Understand now?

Bollox. If he didn't report it to the league, he should have escalated it within Bolton.

telling a 'mate' or anyone else for that matter is not "Reporting" it.

Telling anyone is divulging the facts, no matter who it is you are telling. The idea is to prevent cover-ups. When this goes further the likes of SE25 and the rest will get it. If the league make a ruling that neither party or either party agrees with they can take the league to court over the decision if they believe it transvenes any law, Now my bet is Tan will take this to court once the league decides Palace have no case to answer. After all, Tan is proving that desperate. Then anyone who is known to be involved will be asked to tell all. Those who do not declare honestly what they know will then be seen to withholding information, or even abetting. Those who truly think the above scenario is not possible or likely need to look back at sport in general and soccer in particular. Hopefully I hope this puts my side to this to rest and I pray nothing of what I've said, occurs.

That's the word, aiding and abetting, not perverting the course of justice. Almost like when someone witnesses a car crash. It is against the law to not report it if the incident has been witnessed no? Just hope this doesn't get further in the courts which could culminate in any points deductions.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View glazedallover's Profile glazedallover Flag Allier 18 Apr 14 8.46pm Send a Private Message to glazedallover Add glazedallover as a friend

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 8.42pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 5.40pm

Quote glazedallover at 18 Apr 2014 5.24pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 5.20pm

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 18 Apr 2014 1.12pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am

Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.

Once again, HE DID NOT GO TO THE AUTHORITIES the sad little s*** went running off to OGS. Not the same thing.

It doesn't matter who DF went to Gogh, the fact is he reported it somewhere. so the ends the same. Understand now?

Bollox. If he didn't report it to the league, he should have escalated it within Bolton.

telling a 'mate' or anyone else for that matter is not "Reporting" it.

Telling anyone is divulging the facts, no matter who it is you are telling. The idea is to prevent cover-ups. When this goes further the likes of SE25 and the rest will get it. If the league make a ruling that neither party or either party agrees with they can take the league to court over the decision if they believe it transvenes any law, Now my bet is Tan will take this to court once the league decides Palace have no case to answer. After all, Tan is proving that desperate. Then anyone who is known to be involved will be asked to tell all. Those who do not declare honestly what they know will then be seen to withholding information, or even abetting. Those who truly think the above scenario is not possible or likely need to look back at sport in general and soccer in particular. Hopefully I hope this puts my side to this to rest and I pray nothing of what I've said, occurs.

That's the word, aiding and abetting, not perverting the course of justice. Almost like when someone witnesses a car crash. It is against the law to not report it if the incident has been witnessed no? Just hope this doesn't get further in the courts which could culminate in any points deductions.

That's the word, aiding and abetting. Three words when none would suffice. Beggars belief.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 11 of 13 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!