Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,
A crime ? LOL Mate , you're off on one. All he had to do was either ignore it or send a message back saying wrong address. There was no need to do anything else. He was being vindictive.
Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.
WTF are you on about?
Bexley Dave
Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!
"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,
Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.
And how was he putting his job on the line ? What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text? Jesus wept. DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.
Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.
LOL - you're seriously barking. Keep thinking happy thoughts in your Dougie Wonderland.
Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that.
He'd be getting compasses in his ass all through double French.
Ouch, that brings back some painful memories!
Bexley Dave
Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!
"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.
LOL - you're seriously barking. Keep thinking happy thoughts in your Dougie Wonderland.