You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
April 19 2024 1.02am

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 271 of 311 < 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 >

Topic Locked

legaleagle Flag 28 Apr 15 9.00pm

Quote TheJudge at 28 Apr 2015 7.04pm

Labour were hoping that the endless stream of immigrants would mean that they would win the election for ever more. Unfortunately they have been so useless that the only people who still vote for them are people that have just learned to tie their shoe laces or are ex miners.
Sorry I forgot the few champaign socialists who haven't moved abroad.

Edited by TheJudge (28 Apr 2015 7.06pm)

In your haste to have a rather pathetic dig at Labour and any of the millions (plainly all far less intelligent than you) who vote for them, and to refer again to your pet topic of immigrants (when not posting about your new other pet topic of race), you overlook that EU nationals (other than Irish citizens) do not have the vote in parliamentary elections here.But don't let that stand in the way of blind prejudice and/or perhaps being unable to even thread the veritable shoelaces into the shoe in the first place.


Edited by legaleagle (28 Apr 2015 10.16pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Johnny Eagles's Profile Johnny Eagles Flag berlin 28 Apr 15 9.38pm Send a Private Message to Johnny Eagles Add Johnny Eagles as a friend

Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now.

But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.

 


...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 28 Apr 15 10.00pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote Johnny Eagles at 28 Apr 2015 9.38pm

Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now.

But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.


They are predicted to get anything from zero and two seats at most by the US stat magician Nate Silver. 'Effective and Excellent' has a low bar these days.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
legaleagle Flag 28 Apr 15 10.13pm

.

Edited by legaleagle (28 Apr 2015 10.13pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
legaleagle Flag 28 Apr 15 10.13pm

Quote Johnny Eagles at 28 Apr 2015 9.38pm

Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now.

But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.


Putting personal preferences aside,

Don't disagree re a credible "party of the left" and at least you don't appear to fall into a knee jerk equation of Labour automatically being of the "left" as opposed to left-inclined centrism nowadays.

Not sure Farage has been very effective during this campaign...I think he's underperformed to date...very subdued...

UKIP have an excellent record in the last European elections and three recent by elections for parliamentary seats,I agree.But at present they appear on course for a maximum of two seats.

The Greens (who have been hamstring by abject performances by their leader)aren't that different to UKIP in terms of projected number of seats/% in polls.I find them no less credible than UKIP as a serious political party and political force for the future though I accept "credible" will depend on political viewpoint to some degree.

Obviously, some of the Greens' policy statements have been less than thought through but then again in terms of credibility,if you take UKIP's main message away (EU/immigration),not sure the rest of the policies are any more credible overall than The Greens' if you take away their "main message" re climate change etc. Some of UKIP's recent flip flops re immigration policies have arguably been shambolic...

The interesting thing is how "old" the age profile of UKIP voters is in the polls so perhaps diminishing over time as opposed to the Greens' age profile which is young and so may well increase as more young voters come on board.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View davenotamonkey's Profile davenotamonkey Flag 28 Apr 15 10.51pm Send a Private Message to davenotamonkey Add davenotamonkey as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 28 Apr 2015 10.00pm

Quote Johnny Eagles at 28 Apr 2015 9.38pm

Wish I hadn't waded into you lot trolling each other now.

But I do think the lack of a credible left wing party at this election is striking. Say what you like about UKIP, they have an effective leader and an excellent electoral record.


They are predicted to get anything from zero and two seats at most by the US stat magician Nate Silver. 'Effective and Excellent' has a low bar these days.

Does that not say an immense amount about just how bad the sham electoral system is in this country?

That a party polling on 15% stands to receive 0-2 seats, yet the percentage of the national vote the SNP will get (rough back of envelope: 50% of 5 million = 2.5 million = 4% of national vote) and they are projected 57 seats.

Is this not ringing alarm bells? Our electoral system is not fit for purpose.

FWIW, I voted for AV in the referendum, despite hating the Lib Dems, as this was at least a move away from FPTP.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
TheJudge Flag 28 Apr 15 11.20pm

Quote legaleagle at 28 Apr 2015 9.00pm

Quote TheJudge at 28 Apr 2015 7.04pm

Labour were hoping that the endless stream of immigrants would mean that they would win the election for ever more. Unfortunately they have been so useless that the only people who still vote for them are people that have just learned to tie their shoe laces or are ex miners.
Sorry I forgot the few champaign socialists who haven't moved abroad.

Edited by TheJudge (28 Apr 2015 7.06pm)

In your haste to have a rather pathetic dig at Labour and any of the millions (plainly all far less intelligent than you) who vote for them, and to refer again to your pet topic of immigrants (when not posting about your new other pet topic of race), you overlook that EU nationals (other than Irish citizens) do not have the vote in parliamentary elections here.But don't let that stand in the way of blind prejudice and/or perhaps being unable to even thread the veritable shoelaces into the shoe in the first place.


Edited by legaleagle (28 Apr 2015 10.16pm)


Hang on. Who's talking about EU nationals ? Nice try.
And what prejudice are you referring to ? Other than toward Ed stop go animation Milliband and his friends.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
legaleagle Flag 29 Apr 15 12.02am

As I understand it,you have a major major problem about the number of immigrants coming to the UK.You have now gone on to suggest the "endless stream" of immigrants will vote Labour in the election and appear to suggest some sort of conspiracy ensuing from this by Labour to have encouraged the "endless stream" for this reason.

A large part in numbers are from EU countries.Such people can't vote in parliamentary elections here.Non commonwealth national immigrants from outside the EU can't vote here in parliamentary elections either.

According to a House of Commons briefing report on migration in 2014, c.two thirds of immigrants come from EU or non Commonwealth countries,so can't vote in parliamentary elections.

The prejudices I was referring to?Just the rather silly ones expressed in your post I was responding to.

Edited by legaleagle (29 Apr 2015 12.20am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View davenotamonkey's Profile davenotamonkey Flag 29 Apr 15 12.14am Send a Private Message to davenotamonkey Add davenotamonkey as a friend

Quote legaleagle at 29 Apr 2015 12.02am


I didn't misunderstand you.

As I understand it,you have a major problem about the number of immigrants coming to the UK.A large part in numbers are from EU countries.I had understood you from posts in the past to take the view that ceasing EU free movement was a key step in your oft expressed desire to stem overall immigration into the UK.

Of course,non commonwealth national immigrants from outside the EU can't vote here in parliamentary elections either.

According to a House of Commons briefing report on migration in 2014, c.two thirds of immigrants come from EU or non Commonwealth countries,so can't vote in parliamentary elections.

The prejudices I was referring to?Just your inane ones expressed in your post I was responding to.

Hope you are getting on well with the shoe laces

...so you're saying 1/3 can? That's around the population of Basingstoke every year. Given that the vast number would be un/low-skilled, it's not rocketscience to see how they (and other immigrants granted citizenship) would be voting.

Whilst I can't provide the figures to assert the following, it's my instinct (I may be wrong) that emigrants are generally skilled/higher educated (or retired) than immigrants: therefore the political swing from overall net migration is pushed even further left.

Perhaps the left are more comfortable with velcro?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Seth's Profile Seth Flag On a pale blue dot 29 Apr 15 12.33am Send a Private Message to Seth Add Seth as a friend

Quote TheJudge at 28 Apr 2015 5.46pm

Quote Seth at 28 Apr 2015 5.30pm

Quote Hoof Hearted at 28 Apr 2015 4.56pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 28 Apr 2015 4.19pm

Its almost as if it sells newspapers and content, to print only the 'inflamtory' side of stories. I mean you hear a lot about crazy Muslims, but you don't actually ever seem to see or met them.


[Link]

I'll bet Lee Rigby's family wished he hadn't seen or met crazy Muslims Jamie.


Lee Rigby's family have also made it very clear they don't want his murder to be used a political football or a stick to beat Muslims in general with.

You are not allowed to remember that, or 9/11 or 7/7 it's not PC.


In which of your imaginary universes is this the case?

 


"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down"
FA Cup MOTD 24/4/16

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
legaleagle Flag 29 Apr 15 12.35am

Quote davenotamonkey at 29 Apr 2015 12.14am

Quote legaleagle at 29 Apr 2015 12.02am


...so you're saying 1/3 can? That's around the population of Basingstoke every year. Given that the vast number would be un/low-skilled, it's not rocketscience to see how they (and other immigrants granted citizenship) would be voting.

Whilst I can't provide the figures to assert the following, it's my instinct (I may be wrong) that emigrants are generally skilled/higher educated (or retired) than immigrants: therefore the political swing from overall net migration is pushed even further left.

Perhaps the left are more comfortable with velcro?

My first point was that unlike the impression the Judge's original post gave (which I was correcting) ,the majority of recent immigrants can't even vote in the coming election.

You cannot necessarily make the assumptions you do.Those recent migrants that can vote will only be those migrants from Commonwealth countries and Ireland.

This will include students and the many highly skilled people who come to work in an international centre like London.

We have the equivalent of a points-based system in operation for most non EU immigration so it cannot be assumed the average Commonwealth national migrant coming here now would necessarily be low skilled/educated.Commonwealth migrants also include citizens of Australia,New Zealand, Canada and South Africa.

According to ukimmigration.com,the "points-based" categories (ie you have to score enough points to get the visa)are:

"Tier 1 Visas: For highly skilled migrants, entrepreneurs, investors, and graduate students. This has replaced the previous Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP), the Entrepreneur and Investor schemes, and the International Graduates Scheme.
Tier 2 Visas: This is for skilled workers, professional sports people, and clergy members who have a job offer or arrangement with a UK organization that requires their services for an extended period of time. This tier will replaced the previous UK Work Permit rules.
Tier 3 Visas: This tier is for a limited numbers of lower skilled workers to fill temporary shortages in the labour market. The UK has indefinitely suspended plans to implement this tier.
Tier 4 Visas: International Students.
Tier 5 Visas: For youth mobility and temporary workers, such as those who come under Working Holiday agreements with other countries. It will also covers temporary volunteer workers, sports people taking part in events, and visiting clergy."


It cannot be assumed Commonwealth migrants recently arrived will vote en bloc for Labour.

For myself,I think the right of commonwealth and Irish nationals to vote is an anomaly,a hangover from long gone days of Empire,long due for abolition (In Australia,for example,they changed the rules,which had been similar, so British nationals arriving after 1984 can't vote in federal elections)and I would limit the vote in parliamentary elections to UK nationals,but that's off topic.

Edited by legaleagle (29 Apr 2015 12.53am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 29 Apr 15 2.04am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 28 Apr 2015 7.43pm

Matthew - what is actually wrong with saying 'n1gger' if it is in context? I saw '12 Years a Slave' recently and the term was used many, many times and it seemed appropriate given the subject matter.

You personally seem to have an issue with it being used at all no matter what.

We've had this conversation before but you never actually clarified your 100% anti-stance. Were the director of the film and the screenplay writers and the actors wrong to use the word in your opinion and if so 'why'?

Simple question - would you use the 'n' word?

You use 'bender'. Therefore one would assume that you would use other offensive words.

With regards to the cinematic usage of slurs, I am not for censorship. However, there does need to be a line drawn. Did you see Django Unchained? To me, Tarantino overused racial slurs in the film for reasons of his own knowing. Racial slurs were to me, used too frequently to be of any relevance to the story and were there to shock and create controversy to hype the film. There is therefore a glance between historical accuracy and overuse to be found.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 271 of 311 < 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic