You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 'Harmless'
April 16 2024 9.24pm

'Harmless'

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 5 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

 

imbored Flag UK 18 Feb 15 8.23pm

Colorado is making so much money from cannabis it's having to give some back to citizens

Quote

Colorado's marijuana experiment has been an empirically rousing success thus far, with crime down and tourism up, and now the state has collected so much money in tax from sales of pot that it might be legally obliged to give some back.

The state constitution puts a cap on the amount of tax money that can be taken in before some has to be returned, meaning Coloradans could see a share of the $50 million generated by sales of recreational cannabis.

It's such an uncommon situation that both Democrats and Republicans are in agreement on it - both insist that there is no point in returning the money to taxpayers, not something you usually hear the GOP saying. - [Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View TUX's Profile TUX Flag redhill 18 Feb 15 8.29pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.


Are people with serious mental health issues the best judge of when they became 'insane' though? It may be that they were self medicating problems that were already on their way to getting out of control. If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.

As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.

'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something.

We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic..

If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.


Edited by imbored (18 Feb 2015 8.15pm)

''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.''

'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate.
He gave his opinion based on his experience.
Would you like to give your opinion and facts regarding 'there's no support for that'?

You're not the only one who's 'bored'.

Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 18 Feb 15 8.38pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 8.29pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.


Are people with serious mental health issues the best judge of when they became 'insane' though? It may be that they were self medicating problems that were already on their way to getting out of control. If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.

As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.

'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something.

We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic..

If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.


Edited by imbored (18 Feb 2015 8.15pm)

''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.''

'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate.
He gave his opinion based on his experience.
Would you like to give your opinion and facts regarding 'there's no support for that'?

You're not the only one who's 'bored'.

Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm)

I'm saying that taking a wider view there is no support indicating that weed causes the majority of people in psych wards to lose their minds. It's not a controversial view. I didn't say that there is no support for his direct experience.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View TUX's Profile TUX Flag redhill 18 Feb 15 9.00pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.38pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 8.29pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.


Are people with serious mental health issues the best judge of when they became 'insane' though? It may be that they were self medicating problems that were already on their way to getting out of control. If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.

As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.

'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something.

We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic..

If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.


Edited by imbored (18 Feb 2015 8.15pm)

''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.''

'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate.
He gave his opinion based on his experience.
Would you like to give your opinion and facts regarding 'there's no support for that'?

You're not the only one who's 'bored'.

Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm)

I'm saying that taking a wider view there is no support indicating that weed causes the majority of people in psych wards to lose their minds. It's not a controversial view. I didn't say that there is no support for his direct experience.


No. You said that 'reborn' was implying something when he clearly wasn't.
Feel free to take the 'wider view', as is your right, just don't implicate others because you can't read.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 18 Feb 15 9.21pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 9.00pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.38pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 8.29pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 8.07pm

Quote TUX at 18 Feb 2015 7.56pm

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.


Are people with serious mental health issues the best judge of when they became 'insane' though? It may be that they were self medicating problems that were already on their way to getting out of control. If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.

As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.

'Reborn' has passed on the knowledge he has gained by those he found himself surrounded with at that time. He 'implied' nothing. Just gave facts. Stop twisting and honest post, read what was written and there's a slim chance you may learn something.

We were actually in complete agreement on another thread very recently over the treatment of religious people. Here I disagreed. As is life. It was an honest reading of his comments. A damn sight nicer may I add, than the treatment he receives towards his faith that routinely goes without comment. Back on topic..

If someone says "the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane." it's hardly an 'out there' idea to ask if they think that this is the case on a wider scale.


Edited by imbored (18 Feb 2015 8.15pm)

''If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.''

'Reborn' never said that. He gave an honest appraisal of what he's learnt but you want him to expand further regarding the wider picture when that was never in the debate.
He gave his opinion based on his experience.
Would you like to give your opinion and facts regarding 'there's no support for that'?

You're not the only one who's 'bored'.

Edited by TUX (18 Feb 2015 8.30pm)

I'm saying that taking a wider view there is no support indicating that weed causes the majority of people in psych wards to lose their minds. It's not a controversial view. I didn't say that there is no support for his direct experience.


No. You said that 'reborn' was implying something when he clearly wasn't.
Feel free to take the 'wider view', as is your right, just don't implicate others because you can't read.


I took the view that:

"Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane."

logically leads to if the poster believes this is true of the majority of people on Psych wards with mental health issues. I said 'if'. He's the ideal person to answer not you. And it's simply a question, not something to anger yourself over.

Edited by imbored (18 Feb 2015 9.22pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 19 Feb 15 7.23am

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.

The majority of them probably drank as well. Most cases of mental health correlate with substance abuse, typically quite consistent substance abuse - Probably as a form of self medication.

It doesn't seem to cause psychosis, the level of psychosis in society is far to low for it to be a major contributory factor (plus psychiatry doesn't generally regard psychosis as operating like that), psychosis like schizophrenia involves excessive dopamine levels, and cannabis doesn't seem to bind to, or affect dopamine production.

However, what it may do, is trigger a psychosis in people predisposed towards psychosis, and my guess would be that this is through occasional bad reactions such as the 'whities or fear', which can produce a panic response, which involves paranoia and fear - which do have an affect on dopamine.

In most people, these experiences aren't too significant, however if you were predisposed towards psychosis there is sufficient similarlity to present a case that, similar to PTSD (which has a genetic association) that the affect of the experience creates a recurrent problem (ie that the initial environmental stimulus, in certain people, will activate the predisposition).

This would also explain why its a phenomena associated with notably strong strains of weed, rather than weed in general.

Edited by jamiemartin721 (19 Feb 2015 7.36am)

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 19 Feb 15 7.54am

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
I just think your analysis here is wrong.

I known plenty of people who buy bootleg fags....It's the same principle. Bootleg booze as well, if they can get hold of it at a cheaper price.

Bootleg booze and fags are in the whole produced from legal sources, they're effectively purchased legally, and smuggled to evade tax.

The level of violence and crime involved in the bootleg cigs and booze is hardly comparable to the illict drug trade. The criminal element is essentially low key, non-corruptive and not involved in controlling the market through violence.

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
They legalised marijuana in Colorado....Hasn't worked.

[Link]

Which is why the key factor is production under licence, through established businesses not by just 'legalising the existing sources'. Its important to note that the states approach is flawed in that it doesn't or hasn't approached the issue of where the drug comes from.

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm

There are plenty of arguments against any kind of legalization....The tacit approval the state would then be giving to drugs use...

Which is irrelivent - The state tacitly approves the consumption of alcohol and tabbacco. Plus the state may disapprove, society itself generally seems quite happy to provide tacit approval.

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm

The increase in drug taking leading to more medical intervention.....I'm not sure I want the state getting involved in rubber stamping more negative life choices over the options we already have.

Possibly, but it will also free up an enormous amount of law enforcement spending. Studies suggest that short term, the use will rise, long term its stabalises to around similar levels seen in current use. The reality is that these drugs are pretty freely available anyhow.

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm

For me hallucinogenic drugs usage for pleasure is attached to failure and I don't want my young son growing up in a society that shrugs its shoulders about it.

Maybe, but what you want your kid doing, and what they'll do are two entirely separate facts, and a society 'that shrugs' isn't the only choice. We have a society that approaches legal smoking with a rather different approach, and it would be wrong for any society to move to a 'hey lets all get high', what legalisation needs to do is target a health problem as a health problem, not a criminal justice one.

Most of the people I know who are or were drug users are just ordinary members of society, from all walks of life, I don't really think its a sign of failure at all. Its a long time since drug use was synonymous with fringe cultures that reject society - Esctasy pretty much changed that.

I'm fairly certain that you don't want your son getting a criminal record, just because he smoked some weed with his mates, one time, and was unlucky. Or have him drinking himself into a state on a Friday night. Doesn't mean he won't, because you and the law state otherwise. In fact quite the opposite.

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Feb 2015 5.46pm
Anyway I could live with legalization though I don't agree that it is the best overall way to proceed....If the problems with it could be overcome and genuinely led to an improvement I could see that opinion changing.

I think the criminal justice approach failed, and was doomed to fail, creating far more problems for users, addicts and society in general than it ever resolved. Most notably, problems for people who don't take drugs.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View reborn's Profile reborn 19 Feb 15 9.59am Send a Private Message to reborn Add reborn as a friend

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.


Are people with serious mental health issues the best judge of when they became 'insane' though? It may be that they were self medicating problems that were already on their way to getting out of control. If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.

As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.


Interesting question, and impossible to quantify accurately. I think however the link between THC and mental illness is quite clear.

 


My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyb1's Profile dannyb1 Flag Chichester 19 Feb 15 11.02am Send a Private Message to dannyb1 Add dannyb1 as a friend

I will take the mental illness aspect from a personal experience of someone I knew, I don't know all the facts but the best I knew was that in her younger years she suffered I believe sexual abuse by a family member, she had always been quite loud and bubbly as a teenager whilst I was around 11/12.
In her late teens she had a good job, drinking, smoking weed, going clubbing, popping pills etc etc I think it might have been a case of anything and everything.
She met a fellow settled down still took substances to whatever degree had 2 kids then family life broke down, they separated and not long after that she ends up in bethlam after hearing voices, to come out and never be the same person I knew.
This never stopped her from still smoking cannabis after but I believe it was not the root cause just part of a contributing factor.

I used to drink but am teetotal to a degree as prior to christmas day where I had 1 pint with the father in law (which got me quite smashed) I hadn't had one for around 3yrs.
I smoke cannabis regularly and have done since 16 I'm 33 now(I tried earlier but not often) and have dabbled in certain other substances, I was hooked on cocaine for around 2yrs in my mid twentys after I stopped that I quite alcohol.
I've tried ecstasy a few times, crack once, heroin once, never really cared for them.
I have had some things go on in my life but probably not as bad as what happened to my friend above, but what I guess I'm trying to say is I have done that without any mental or psychotic episodes and I really believe that whoever claims cannabis was or is the main root of mental health is talking absolute bollocks there will most likely be an underlying condition that will manifest and trigger whatever receptors it is that causes it much the same as depression.

So old Jon Snow Whitey can stick his "it's much worse then a war zone" bollocks, as many people have said if you stuck him in a better environment to carry this out you would have got a different result but this is not what channel 4 want oh no as channel 4 look to be some kind of political propaganda tool as there is an election a foot and the waning public feeling on cannabis prohibition on public polls had started to take quite a rise in favour of legalization.

If they wanted to make this experiment fair they should also have a regular smoker do the same as I cannot see what would be much different in comparison of brain scans.
Or let a first time drinker down a bottle of pure rum and stick them in a sterile cold environment and stick them in a whirring conveyor belt.

So enough of this morals s*** as we as a society don't have them

We know alcohol causes multiple damages to the individual and sometimes those around but we don't stop selling it, just tell people to "drink responsibly" as it's deemed a health issue, well why can't we do the same with cannabis.

We know tobacco does the same as the above.

We know bankers caused the majority of the world to go into financial meltdown but we still let them trade and give them more money to bail them out.

We knew the very people in the heart of our government were molesting young children at the time, but prevented anything being done to stop it.

Those with there snouts in the trough benefit from those wealthy enough to see cannabis legalization as a threat and will pay anything to keep it that way, GW pharmaceuticals would not want any old MS sufferer growing there medicine when they sell it at god knows the mark up on there cannabis spray sativex.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
imbored Flag UK 19 Feb 15 3.37pm

Quote reborn at 19 Feb 2015 9.59am

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.


Are people with serious mental health issues the best judge of when they became insane though? It may be that they were self medicating problems that were already on their way to getting out of control. If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.

As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.


Interesting question, and impossible to quantify accurately. I think however the link between THC and mental illness is quite clear.

Thanks very much for your reply reborn

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 19 Feb 15 6.18pm

Quote reborn at 19 Feb 2015 9.59am

Quote imbored at 18 Feb 2015 5.16pm

Quote reborn at 18 Feb 2015 4.57pm

Having had two stays in Psych wards, I can say that the majority of people there (who could talk), had a weed smoking habit before going insane.

Like alcohol, the majority will do it without serious repercussion, but to deny its link to mental illness is stupidity. In some it clearly causes psychosis.


Are people with serious mental health issues the best judge of when they became 'insane' though? It may be that they were self medicating problems that were already on their way to getting out of control. If you're implying that weed caused the majority of people in psych wards to go insane, I'd say there is no support for that.

As others have highlighted the illegality of the drug makes it much more likely that people will indulge in stronger strains and other drugs too. I'd much rather people have a pint, than buy random concoctions from some random guy on a street corner. That's the equivilent of current policy.


Interesting question, and impossible to quantify accurately. I think however the link between THC and mental illness is quite clear.

definately a correlation but its not the thc. Even this report suggests that its not the thc, but the intense strength strains. I wouldn't say cannabis is harmless or without risks either given that its generally smoked, with tabbacco etc.

The issue isn't whether its harmful, it whether or not the legal prohibition is more harmful than the drug itself and whether those laws serve the best interests of society, including the drug users.


Edited by jamiemartin721 (20 Feb 2015 9.34am)

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View dannyb1's Profile dannyb1 Flag Chichester 14 Apr 15 12.28pm Send a Private Message to dannyb1 Add dannyb1 as a friend

[Link]

Interesting and I never thought the DM would run this type of story (and will probably go back to cannabis bashing tomorrow)but it seems the cat is finally starting to come out the bag now.
I'm not advocating it is the cure but science is science and is tried and tested and those funny men in white coats know a lot more then the average joe like myself.

We know that it has many medical benefits, someone posted a link here to palaces very own centenary book where an extract from the advertiser was promoting a pharmacist prescribing cannabis for corns in penge.

All we have left is only the stigma of reefer madness that people need to shrug off, cannabis medically will be accepted worldwide when more and more country's lift there scheduling ban and those men in white coats are free to explore more in depth the possibility's that are out there.

And not only in medicine, hemp fibre for paper, fabric, textile and the oil for paint, fuel and much more.

[Link]

[Link]

[Link]

[Link]

[Link]

[Link]


I know it's only the mirror but the poll results are usually the same every time the question of legalization is asked.
[Link]

This company would crumble if cannabis was made legal and are paying good money to keep it that way.
Remember cannabis is a class B schedule 1 drug for you and I but for them it's class 4 which states that there is medicinal value but at class 1 level to you and I it has no medicinal value, I call that double standards.
[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 5 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 'Harmless'