You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Socialism in action
March 29 2024 1.32am

Socialism in action

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 7 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

 

legaleagle Flag 13 Jun 15 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 13 Jun 15 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 12.29pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


Muslims are the new Irish.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 13 Jun 15 12.34pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


Muslims are the new Irish.


You are right ..they both have terrorists amongst them.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 13 Jun 15 12.39pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


She was arrested because she was behaving wrongly.If a muslim person had randomly run up and started abusing her (and she'd been quietly going about her business),they'd have likely been arrested for harassment or conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.Like I said,she could have been charged under more than one law.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 12.39pm

Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


Muslims are the new Irish.


You are right ..they both have terrorists amongst them.

Which gives people ample ammunition and excuse to abuse all of them, terrorist or not.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 13 Jun 15 12.46pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm

Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


Muslims are the new Irish.


You are right ..they both have terrorists amongst them.

Which gives people ample ammunition and excuse to abuse all of them, terrorist or not.


Not what I said.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 1.24pm

Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.46pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm

Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 12.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 12.29pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


Muslims are the new Irish.


You are right ..they both have terrorists amongst them.

Which gives people ample ammunition and excuse to abuse all of them, terrorist or not.


Not what I said.

Didn't say you did, but I still think some project the whole jihadi thing and use it to judge swathes of people.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 13 Jun 15 1.28pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


She was arrested because she was behaving wrongly.If a muslim person had randomly run up and started abusing her (and she'd been quietly going about her business),they'd have likely been arrested for harassment or conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.Like I said,she could have been charged under more than one law.

You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 15 1.55pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 1.28pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


She was arrested because she was behaving wrongly.If a muslim person had randomly run up and started abusing her (and she'd been quietly going about her business),they'd have likely been arrested for harassment or conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.Like I said,she could have been charged under more than one law.

You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.


Back this claim up then. When you say muslims are preaching death (and no doubt there have been instances), how many roughly?
If you know about it, why not report it.
Or are you suggesting that it is being deliberately ignored?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 13 Jun 15 2.00pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 1.55pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 1.28pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


She was arrested because she was behaving wrongly.If a muslim person had randomly run up and started abusing her (and she'd been quietly going about her business),they'd have likely been arrested for harassment or conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.Like I said,she could have been charged under more than one law.

You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.


Back this claim up then. When you say muslims are preaching death (and no doubt there have been instances), how many roughly?
If you know about it, why not report it.
Or are you suggesting that it is being deliberately ignored?


Don't act like an idiot Nick, you are far from stupid.
You know for years and years it went on unchecked,because we did not want to "upset the Muslim community".
In just the same way the Muslim grooming gangs went unchecked,and that has been admitted that was the reason it went on so long.
Now I don't think all Muslims are terrorists before you come out with that old chestnut.
Just lets stop all this they can do no wrong attitude.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
derben Flag 13 Jun 15 2.08pm

Quote elgrande at 13 Jun 2015 2.00pm

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jun 2015 1.55pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 1.28pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 12.39pm

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 12.04pm

Quote legaleagle at 13 Jun 2015 11.26am

Quote derben at 13 Jun 2015 9.37am

Quote legaleagle at 12 Jun 2015 10.55pm

Because you may have thought the woman was arrested for a "racist" offence because of the headings in some of the press coverage.She wasn't.The heading in some press coverage was a reference to the man,whose separate arrest was covered in the same stories.

She was arrested I would have thought for yelling in a "breach of the peace" situation at people quietly going about their business.I suspect the offence was the yelling in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace at people quietly going about their business.Not the words "go back home".

Edited by legaleagle (12 Jun 2015 11.01pm)

She was actually charged with a, fashionable, 'racially aggravated' public order offence. If an 85-year-old woman had been arrested and handcuffed at one of the 'anti-austerity' rent-a-mob gatherings, image the outcry from the likes of you, imagine the histrionics of nick, the accusations of fascist police-state etc etc. It is the usual lib/left double standards and hypocrisy.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 9.38am)


You are right.It wasn't breach of the peace.She was charged with harassment, And yes,racially aggravated.They could have done her for breach of the peace or plain harassment. That type of thing in the high street would render you liable to arrest whether it was 2015 or 1955.Police asked her to stop three times.She wasn't only shouting "go back home" but general abuse also it appears.

She pleaded guilty.She got a 6 month conditional discharge.

Hardly something she should be proud of.

Police may have been OTT about manner of arrest.We weren't there.If they were, doesn't make the law invalid or her conduct anything to applaud..

You seem to think she did nothing wrong.So,lets agree to disagree.

I agree, nothing to be proud of. But she was still a victim of politically biased policing. If on a 'peoples' demo, yelling "Tory scum" or "what do we want", "a peoples' revolution", "when do we want it?", "NOW!", she would not have been arrested. Similarly if she was at the football match shouting "go home you bums" and 'general abuse', she would not have been arrested. She was handcuffed and arrested because she was making her comments to a group of Muslims.


She was arrested because she was behaving wrongly.If a muslim person had randomly run up and started abusing her (and she'd been quietly going about her business),they'd have likely been arrested for harassment or conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.Like I said,she could have been charged under more than one law.

You think so? Muslims have been preaching death to the west on the streets of Britain without hindrance.


Back this claim up then. When you say muslims are preaching death (and no doubt there have been instances), how many roughly?
If you know about it, why not report it.
Or are you suggesting that it is being deliberately ignored?


Don't act like an idiot Nick, you are far from stupid.
You know for years and years it went on unchecked,because we did not want to "upset the Muslim community".
In just the same way the Muslim grooming gangs went unchecked,and that has been admitted that was the reason it went on so long.
Now I don't think all Muslims are terrorists before you come out with that old chestnut.
Just lets stop all this they can do no wrong attitude.

Thanks elgrande, saved me the trouble of posting a similar answer.

But in response to nicks' silly questions:
"how many roughly": between 1 and 126,632 (roughly).
"why not report it": afraid of being arrested for offending Muslims.
"are you suggesting that it is being deliberately ignored": Yes.


Edited by derben (13 Jun 2015 2.12pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 6 of 7 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Socialism in action