Who's to blame - the school or the mother? - Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website

Who's to blame - the school or the mother?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 3 << First < 1 2 3

martinb75 Tampere 19 Jul 15 11.03am
I think she better get a claim in for the pasting and bullying he is about to recieve from his school pals for getting his baps out in a national newspaper. "Never mind son , have another cream cake !" tubby prick !
Alert a moderator to this post

martinb75

Tampere 19 Jul 15 11.03am

I think she better get a claim in for the pasting and bullying he is about to recieve from his school pals for getting his baps out in a national newspaper. "Never mind son , have another cream cake !"
tubby prick !

Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 20 Jul 15 10.13am
The parent should be done for child negelect, unless there is a medical condition for him having bigget tits than most if not all of the girls in his year including the teachers. The Teachers should be done as well, one kid with sun burn is an accident, 4 is negelecting thier duty of care. "It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"
Alert a moderator to this post

dannyh

wherever I lay my hat....... 20 Jul 15 10.13am

The parent should be done for child negelect, unless there is a medical condition for him having bigget tits than most if not all of the girls in his year including the teachers.

The Teachers should be done as well, one kid with sun burn is an accident, 4 is negelecting thier duty of care.

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert a moderator to this post

npn Crowborough 20 Jul 15 10.36am
Quote Kingvagabond at 18 Jul 2015 2.08pm 25 is usually enough for me but on any school trips I pack a bottle of 50 because parents can be dumb enough to pack the kids off with nothing. In fact I've just bought pe kits in 3 different sizes because I got fed up last year of kids missing PE by deliberately 'forgetting' their PE kits. Parents are maddening though and it shouldn't be my responsibility to stump up for kids who's parents forget. I do though because it's not fair on the kids themselves. Which is good of you, and the vast majority of parents would thank you for it, but as soon as the first one suffers an allergic reaction to the suncream you provided, they'll be all over you like a rash.
Alert a moderator to this post

npn

Crowborough 20 Jul 15 10.36am

Quote Kingvagabond at 18 Jul 2015 2.08pm

25 is usually enough for me but on any school trips I pack a bottle of 50 because parents can be dumb enough to pack the kids off with nothing. In fact I've just bought pe kits in 3 different sizes because I got fed up last year of kids missing PE by deliberately 'forgetting' their PE kits.

Parents are maddening though and it shouldn't be my responsibility to stump up for kids who's parents forget. I do though because it's not fair on the kids themselves.

Which is good of you, and the vast majority of parents would thank you for it, but as soon as the first one suffers an allergic reaction to the suncream you provided, they'll be all over you like a rash.

Alert a moderator to this post

rednblue4eva Norwood 21 Jul 15 7.15am
Quote martinb75 at 19 Jul 2015 11.03am I think she better get a claim in for the pasting and bullying he is about to recieve from his school pals for getting his baps out in a national newspaper. "Never mind son , have another cream cake !" tubby prick ! The other kids will be a bit annoyed "The school is now considering not allowing any further trips abroad" So no more trips because this porky wanted to be an twit, and his mother wants compo Never mind, they've had their 15 minutes of fame, and perhaps he can use some of the cash from the papers to pay for a breast reduction
Alert a moderator to this post

rednblue4eva

Norwood 21 Jul 15 7.15am

Quote martinb75 at 19 Jul 2015 11.03am

The other kids will be a bit annoyed

"The school is now considering not allowing any further trips abroad"

So no more trips because this porky wanted to be an twit, and his mother wants compo

Never mind, they've had their 15 minutes of fame, and perhaps he can use some of the cash from the papers to pay for a breast reduction

Alert a moderator to this post

fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 25 Jul 15 1.48pm
Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits.. The kid has moobs and is obese. He needs to get some exercise. As for whose fault it is, well it's a bit of both. The mother should have made sure he had something stronger than factor 15 and the teachers should have been more involved and enforced their policy of the kids applying sun cream.
Alert a moderator to this post

fed up eagle

Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 25 Jul 15 1.48pm

Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm

She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits..

The kid has moobs and is obese. He needs to get some exercise. As for whose fault it is, well it's a bit of both. The mother should have made sure he had something stronger than factor 15 and the teachers should have been more involved and enforced their policy of the kids applying sun cream.

Alert a moderator to this post

becky over the moon 25 Jul 15 2.29pm
Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 1.48pm Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits.. The kid has moobs and is obese. He needs to get some exercise. As for whose fault it is, well it's a bit of both. The mother should have made sure he had something stronger than factor 15 and the teachers should have been more involved and enforced their policy of the kids applying sun cream. As the article says: ""On the day of the pre-planned trip to a water park the group were told at breakfast and before leaving the coach on arrival to apply suncream and be careful of the sun. The group were positioned in a shaded area and reminded regularly during the day to keep applying sun cream. "Unfortunately a small minority of children chose to ignore every one of these warnings and teachers' advice to protect themselves by staying in the shade during the day. "Staff were very upset that the children did suffer burns but there was nothing they could do. The other children had a superb holiday and did not suffer sunburn because they followed instructions." So, since they are prohibited from laying hands on the pupils and actually applying the sun cream to their bodies (and the parents and children were all made aware of THAT fact too), what more do you suggest that they could have done to enforce their policy? A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 25 Jul 15 2.29pm

Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 1.48pm

Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm

She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits..

As the article says: ""On the day of the pre-planned trip to a water park the group were told at breakfast and before leaving the coach on arrival to apply suncream and be careful of the sun. The group were positioned in a shaded area and reminded regularly during the day to keep applying sun cream.

"Unfortunately a small minority of children chose to ignore every one of these warnings and teachers' advice to protect themselves by staying in the shade during the day.

"Staff were very upset that the children did suffer burns but there was nothing they could do. The other children had a superb holiday and did not suffer sunburn because they followed instructions."

So, since they are prohibited from laying hands on the pupils and actually applying the sun cream to their bodies (and the parents and children were all made aware of THAT fact too), what more do you suggest that they could have done to enforce their policy?

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 25 Jul 15 3.14pm
Quote becky at 25 Jul 2015 2.29pm Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 1.48pm Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits.. The kid has moobs and is obese. He needs to get some exercise. As for whose fault it is, well it's a bit of both. The mother should have made sure he had something stronger than factor 15 and the teachers should have been more involved and enforced their policy of the kids applying sun cream. As the article says: ""On the day of the pre-planned trip to a water park the group were told at breakfast and before leaving the coach on arrival to apply suncream and be careful of the sun. The group were positioned in a shaded area and reminded regularly during the day to keep applying sun cream. "Unfortunately a small minority of children chose to ignore every one of these warnings and teachers' advice to protect themselves by staying in the shade during the day. "Staff were very upset that the children did suffer burns but there was nothing they could do. The other children had a superb holiday and did not suffer sunburn because they followed instructions." So, since they are prohibited from laying hands on the pupils and actually applying the sun cream to their bodies (and the parents and children were all made aware of THAT fact too), what more do you suggest that they could have done to enforce their policy? Well if they noticed the kids not applying sun cream they should have given them some and told them to apply it or they would have privileges withdrawn, I'm pretty sure that would have worked.
Alert a moderator to this post

fed up eagle

Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 25 Jul 15 3.14pm

Quote becky at 25 Jul 2015 2.29pm

Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 1.48pm

Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm

She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits..

"Unfortunately a small minority of children chose to ignore every one of these warnings and teachers' advice to protect themselves by staying in the shade during the day.

So, since they are prohibited from laying hands on the pupils and actually applying the sun cream to their bodies (and the parents and children were all made aware of THAT fact too), what more do you suggest that they could have done to enforce their policy?

Well if they noticed the kids not applying sun cream they should have given them some and told them to apply it or they would have privileges withdrawn, I'm pretty sure that would have worked.

Alert a moderator to this post

paperhat croydon 27 Jul 15 3.30pm
Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 3.14pm Quote becky at 25 Jul 2015 2.29pm Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 1.48pm Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits.. The kid has moobs and is obese. He needs to get some exercise. As for whose fault it is, well it's a bit of both. The mother should have made sure he had something stronger than factor 15 and the teachers should have been more involved and enforced their policy of the kids applying sun cream. As the article says: ""On the day of the pre-planned trip to a water park the group were told at breakfast and before leaving the coach on arrival to apply suncream and be careful of the sun. The group were positioned in a shaded area and reminded regularly during the day to keep applying sun cream. "Unfortunately a small minority of children chose to ignore every one of these warnings and teachers' advice to protect themselves by staying in the shade during the day. "Staff were very upset that the children did suffer burns but there was nothing they could do. The other children had a superb holiday and did not suffer sunburn because they followed instructions." So, since they are prohibited from laying hands on the pupils and actually applying the sun cream to their bodies (and the parents and children were all made aware of THAT fact too), what more do you suggest that they could have done to enforce their policy? Well if they noticed the kids not applying sun cream they should have given them some and told them to apply it or they would have privileges withdrawn, I'm pretty sure that would have worked. you've obviously not been near kids in this decade then... Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan
Alert a moderator to this post

paperhat

croydon 27 Jul 15 3.30pm

Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 3.14pm

Quote becky at 25 Jul 2015 2.29pm

Quote fed up eagle at 25 Jul 2015 1.48pm

Quote The Sash at 17 Jul 2015 2.54pm

She should be more concerned he is a 15 year old boy with tits..

"Unfortunately a small minority of children chose to ignore every one of these warnings and teachers' advice to protect themselves by staying in the shade during the day.

So, since they are prohibited from laying hands on the pupils and actually applying the sun cream to their bodies (and the parents and children were all made aware of THAT fact too), what more do you suggest that they could have done to enforce their policy?

Well if they noticed the kids not applying sun cream they should have given them some and told them to apply it or they would have privileges withdrawn, I'm pretty sure that would have worked.

you've obviously not been near kids in this decade then...

Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 3 of 3 << First < 1 2 3

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Who's to blame - the school or the mother?

Site Map

Sponsors