Smoking ban in pub gardens.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 7 of 10 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 15 Aug 15 10.14am
Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) I bet you describe yourself as 'tolerant', don't you? Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 15 Aug 15 10.14am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does.
Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life.
As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

I bet you describe yourself as 'tolerant', don't you?

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 15 Aug 15 10.17am
Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) Isn't a carcinogen. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 15 Aug 15 10.17am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does.
Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life.
As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

Isn't a carcinogen.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge 15 Aug 15 10.47am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) Isn't a carcinogen. I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part. When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant. Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence. Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am)
Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge

15 Aug 15 10.47am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does.
Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life.
As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

Isn't a carcinogen.

I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part.

When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant.

Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence.

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am)

Alert a moderator to this post

martinb75 Tampere 15 Aug 15 11.04am
I don't smoke but this will be taking it too far.
Alert a moderator to this post

martinb75

Tampere 15 Aug 15 11.04am

I don't smoke but this will be taking it too far.

Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande bedford 15 Aug 15 11.05am
Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.47am Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) Isn't a carcinogen. I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part. When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant. Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence. Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am) You could say that about most things,having a pint in the Pub(not essential) going out for a meal,equals self indulgence. always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.
Alert a moderator to this post

elgrande

bedford 15 Aug 15 11.05am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.47am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does.
Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life.
As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

Isn't a carcinogen.

I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part.

When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant.

Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence.

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am)

You could say that about most things,having a pint in the Pub(not essential) going out for a meal,equals self indulgence.

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 15 Aug 15 11.18am
Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.47am Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) Isn't a carcinogen. I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part. When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant. Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence. Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am) If you do label yourself as 'tolerant' (as people like yourself frequently do), then you're just another clich�d comedy leftie and I shall treat all your posts accordingly. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 15 Aug 15 11.18am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.47am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does.
Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life.
As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

Isn't a carcinogen.

I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part.

When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant.

Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence.

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am)

If you do label yourself as 'tolerant' (as people like yourself frequently do), then you're just another clich�d comedy leftie and I shall treat all your posts accordingly.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

Canterbury Palace Whitstable 15 Aug 15 11.28am
Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) I'm slightly baffled at you seriously criticising a very obviously satirical article. That being said, it's amusing that you did criticise it for making general assumptions before then claiming that the majority of people don't want to be anywhere near someone who does. We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold...
Alert a moderator to this post

Canterbury Palace

Whitstable 15 Aug 15 11.28am

Send a Private Message to Canterbury Palace

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

I'm slightly baffled at you seriously criticising a very obviously satirical article. That being said, it's amusing that you did criticise it for making general assumptions before then claiming that the majority of people don't want to be anywhere near someone who does.

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold...

Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge 15 Aug 15 2.37pm
Quote Canterbury Palace at 15 Aug 2015 11.28am Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) I'm slightly baffled at you seriously criticising a very obviously satirical article. That being said, it's amusing that you did criticise it for making general assumptions before then claiming that the majority of people don't want to be anywhere near someone who does. Satirical or not, it was silly. The irony of people express opinions of that sort about having their lives impinged upon by evil anti smoking laws makes me laugh. Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 2.42pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge

15 Aug 15 2.37pm

Quote Canterbury Palace at 15 Aug 2015 11.28am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

Satirical or not, it was silly. The irony of people express opinions of that sort about having their lives impinged upon by evil anti smoking laws makes me laugh.

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 2.42pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge 15 Aug 15 2.41pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 15 Aug 2015 11.18am Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.47am Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am A very silly article. Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does. Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life. As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem. Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ? Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am) Isn't a carcinogen. I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part. When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant. Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence. Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am) If you do label yourself as 'tolerant' (as people like yourself frequently do), then you're just another clich�d comedy leftie and I shall treat all your posts accordingly. So a straw man argument followed by a hugely inaccurate assumption. Good work. I have been called a few things, but "Leftie" ? That takes the biscuit.
Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge

15 Aug 15 2.41pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 15 Aug 2015 11.18am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.47am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Aug 2015 10.17am

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 10.04am

A very silly article.

Firstly, it assumes that everyone is like the person commenting, which they are not. In fact the vast majority don't smoke or want to be anywhere near someone who does.
Secondly, anyone who wants to spend that much time in a pub needs to get a life.
As far as eating a big pub lunch is concerned. Unlike nicotine and all the other carcinogens related to cigarettes,there is no evidence that enjoying a fatty, high calorie meal occasionally is bad for you. It's when you do it most days that it is likely to become a problem.

Why do some people want to take the wingeing of an addict seriously ?

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.05am)

Isn't a carcinogen.

I did not mean to imply that it was, but that is just a diversion on your part.

When it comes to people hooked on addictive substances telling me how they should have the right to pollute the air, I am very intolerant.

Smoking has no use other than to facilitate self indulgence.

Edited by TheJudge (15 Aug 2015 10.47am)

If you do label yourself as 'tolerant' (as people like yourself frequently do), then you're just another clich�d comedy leftie and I shall treat all your posts accordingly.

So a straw man argument followed by a hugely inaccurate assumption.

Good work.

I have been called a few things, but "Leftie" ?
That takes the biscuit.

Alert a moderator to this post

so many memories basingstoke 15 Aug 15 2.41pm
Attachment: Arnott-man+in+moon..jpeg (150.79Kb) Get it on-get it in-F**K OFF ALAN HANSEN!!
Alert a moderator to this post

so many memories

basingstoke 15 Aug 15 2.41pm

Send a Private Message to so many memories

Attachment: Arnott-man+in+moon..jpeg (150.79Kb)

Get it on-get it in-F**K OFF ALAN HANSEN!!

Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge 15 Aug 15 2.45pm
Enough already. I'm abandoning all of you smokers and smoker enablers to your cloudy, wheezy, stinky, carcinogenic heaven. I'm out.
Alert a moderator to this post

TheJudge

15 Aug 15 2.45pm

Enough already.

I'm abandoning all of you smokers and smoker enablers to your cloudy, wheezy, stinky, carcinogenic heaven.

I'm out.

Alert a moderator to this post

becky over the moon 15 Aug 15 3.12pm
Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 2.45pm Enough already. I'm abandoning all of you smokers and smoker enablers to your cloudy, wheezy, stinky, carcinogenic heaven. I'm out. Take a deep breath before you go, there could be smokers outside........ A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 15 Aug 15 3.12pm

Quote TheJudge at 15 Aug 2015 2.45pm

Enough already.

I'm abandoning all of you smokers and smoker enablers to your cloudy, wheezy, stinky, carcinogenic heaven.

I'm out.

Take a deep breath before you go, there could be smokers outside........

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Page 7 of 10 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Smoking ban in pub gardens.

Site Map

Sponsors