You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Richard Seymour - vile human being.
April 18 2024 4.31am

Richard Seymour - vile human being.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

 

View dannyh's Profile dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 04 Sep 15 12.59pm Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 12.16pm

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 10.35am

Quote topcat at 04 Sep 2015 10.06am

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 8.40am

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Sep 2015 8.38am

Crass and stupid attention seeker but he hasn't dropped a barrel bomb on a load of children. Ignore him.


Funny how your defending him as a lefty, if it was someone from the right making equally crass comments about immigrants you'd be slaughtering them.

The lefts hypocrissy knows no bounds.

In what way was Kermit defending him?

People like him (the journalist, not necessarily Kermit), should be ignored and denied the oxygen of infamy that they crave. I had never heard of him before so in a way he has probably obtained his objective.

So why dont people like you, Kerm, Gussett,et all ignore Farage, or the England First idiots, your the first ones to jump on any mail headline that even hints at anything remotley supportive of the right wing ? and yet you and Kerm tell me to ignore some little whiney pr1ck who has bad mouthed what is essentially a disabled person, to be honest I thought you lot would all over that what with him being actually disabled, But oh no, wait he's an ex squaddie so f*** him.

You lot make me wanna puke.

Firstly Nick hasn't posted on this. Secondly Farage and Britain First are also political parties and entities - So they're culpable. Now I agree you with you, f**k this little s**tstain, he's a c**t, but no ones saying 'f**k him he's a squaddie' or similar.

I tend to think both you and Kermit are right. I know I should ignore people like this and Katie Hopkins, Richard Littlejohn or that c**t on TalkSport, because they only do it to get a rise and get oxygen, but they specifically do it in such a way that it will offend certain people so much that they have to respond.

Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law.


I didn’t say nick had posted on this ? just where did I say that? I said that all the lefties including Nick, would be apoplectic with outrage if comments about an immigrant were made by some right wing loony (the polar opposite of this sh1t stain)say for example someone like that twerp Richard LittleJohn came out in his rag and made derogatory comments about the Migrants at Calais all being benefit cheats.

The left on here would go bonkers telling anyone who would listen, he was a nasty racist and should be shot for being so right wing.

My point is when it's one of their own being a complete and utter indefensible wnaker, they are, a) conspicuous by there absence or b) play it down as attention seeking and he deserves a smack on the wrists.

The double standards and hypocrisy at play here are all that I hate about the lefties of the world. Me personally I couldn’t give a flying monkey fcuk who you vote for, if your a dick, then your a dick (not aimed at anyone I hasten to add) for example, I am most certainly right of centre, however I believe Cameron is a slimy oik like toad who should fack off back to Eaton.

However Come on here and call Brown or Corbyn the same, (for they truly are fckutards of the highest order) and you get dogs abuse resulting in pseudo intelligent leftie posters calling you thick, because you don't agree that Corbyn (for example) is the second coming.

Thats my point.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Sep 15 1.07pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 04 Sep 15 1.18pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?


Only one idiot on the islands themselves, and it's their opinions that matter the most.

I think Argentina should give YPF back to Repsol, who they stole it from. I also think they should pay back the 82 billion US dollars they borrowed, and have tried to repeatedly get written off/down. Ironically borrowed to initially pay for the war.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Sep 15 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Sep 15 1.23pm

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.18pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?


Only one idiot on the islands themselves, and it's their opinions that matter the most.

I think Argentina should give YPF back to Repsol, who they stole it from. I also think they should pay back the 82 billion US dollars they borrowed, and have tried to repeatedly get written off/down. Ironically borrowed to initially pay for the war.

I think calling him an idiot is a bit unfair. I'm sure he his reasons.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Sep 15 1.31pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View martin2412's Profile martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 04 Sep 15 1.34pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 12.59pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 12.16pm

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 10.35am

Quote topcat at 04 Sep 2015 10.06am

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 8.40am

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Sep 2015 8.38am

Crass and stupid attention seeker but he hasn't dropped a barrel bomb on a load of children. Ignore him.


Funny how your defending him as a lefty, if it was someone from the right making equally crass comments about immigrants you'd be slaughtering them.

The lefts hypocrissy knows no bounds.

In what way was Kermit defending him?

People like him (the journalist, not necessarily Kermit), should be ignored and denied the oxygen of infamy that they crave. I had never heard of him before so in a way he has probably obtained his objective.

So why dont people like you, Kerm, Gussett,et all ignore Farage, or the England First idiots, your the first ones to jump on any mail headline that even hints at anything remotley supportive of the right wing ? and yet you and Kerm tell me to ignore some little whiney pr1ck who has bad mouthed what is essentially a disabled person, to be honest I thought you lot would all over that what with him being actually disabled, But oh no, wait he's an ex squaddie so f*** him.

You lot make me wanna puke.

Firstly Nick hasn't posted on this. Secondly Farage and Britain First are also political parties and entities - So they're culpable. Now I agree you with you, f**k this little s**tstain, he's a c**t, but no ones saying 'f**k him he's a squaddie' or similar.

I tend to think both you and Kermit are right. I know I should ignore people like this and Katie Hopkins, Richard Littlejohn or that c**t on TalkSport, because they only do it to get a rise and get oxygen, but they specifically do it in such a way that it will offend certain people so much that they have to respond.

Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law.


I didn’t say nick had posted on this ? just where did I say that? I said that all the lefties including Nick, would be apoplectic with outrage if comments about an immigrant were made by some right wing loony (the polar opposite of this sh1t stain)say for example someone like that twerp Richard LittleJohn came out in his rag and made derogatory comments about the Migrants at Calais all being benefit cheats.

The left on here would go bonkers telling anyone who would listen, he was a nasty racist and should be shot for being so right wing.

My point is when it's one of their own being a complete and utter indefensible wnaker, they are, a) conspicuous by there absence or b) play it down as attention seeking and he deserves a smack on the wrists.

The double standards and hypocrisy at play here are all that I hate about the lefties of the world. Me personally I couldn’t give a flying monkey fcuk who you vote for, if your a dick, then your a dick (not aimed at anyone I hasten to add) for example, I am most certainly right of centre, however I believe Cameron is a slimy oik like toad who should fack off back to Eaton.

However Come on here and call Brown or Corbyn the same, (for they truly are fckutards of the highest order) and you get dogs abuse resulting in pseudo intelligent leftie posters calling you thick, because you don't agree that Corbyn (for example) is the second coming.

Thats my point.

Absolutely spot-on.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 04 Sep 15 1.39pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.23pm

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.18pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?


Only one idiot on the islands themselves, and it's their opinions that matter the most.

I think Argentina should give YPF back to Repsol, who they stole it from. I also think they should pay back the 82 billion US dollars they borrowed, and have tried to repeatedly get written off/down. Ironically borrowed to initially pay for the war.

I think calling him an idiot is a bit unfair. I'm sure he his reasons.



I think assuming said idiot is a man is rather sexist.

Turns out there were actually 3 idiots, and I don't think calling them that is unfair.

They'd have to use a worthless currency and then pay tax on their residence, their vehicles, every bank transaction and a wealth tax. On top of income tax/corporation tax and VAT.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 04 Sep 15 1.41pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.31pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.


Not these islands though, rather pertinently.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Matataland 04 Sep 15 1.54pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.31pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.


Not these islands though, rather pertinently.

The Norman invasion and arguably William of Orange's coup represent occupation.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View npn's Profile npn Flag Crowborough 04 Sep 15 1.55pm Send a Private Message to npn Add npn as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 04 Sep 2015 1.54pm

Quote Stuk at 04 Sep 2015 1.41pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.31pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 1.22pm

Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Sep 2015 1.07pm

People don't really think we should just give the Falklands back do they ?

The Argentinians have no valid claim over the islands whatsoever They do currently belong to us so why should that change ?
Shall we give The US back to the so called Natives while we are at it ?

I think its up to the people who live on the Falkland Islands to decide, which they did - So I am happy with that.

No one has valid claim over any country except the people who live there, as a whole.

I wouldn't really compare it to the US and Native Americans, because there wasn't a huge scale genocide perpetuated on the indigenous people of the Falklands.

I supported the liberation of the Falklands not because they were British, but because a fascist Argentina Junta decided they would be Argentine.

The point is that most countries were occupied by someone else in the past.
The Argentinian attack was an unprovoked attack on British territory. I don't care what their politics was. That makes no difference.

Any politician who denies this for votes is a bellend.


Not these islands though, rather pertinently.

The Norman invasion and arguably William of Orange's coup represent occupation.


You could argue the Vikings did alright too.

I demand reparations!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Sep 15 2.03pm

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 12.59pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Sep 2015 12.16pm

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 10.35am

Quote topcat at 04 Sep 2015 10.06am

Quote dannyh at 04 Sep 2015 8.40am

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Sep 2015 8.38am

Crass and stupid attention seeker but he hasn't dropped a barrel bomb on a load of children. Ignore him.


Funny how your defending him as a lefty, if it was someone from the right making equally crass comments about immigrants you'd be slaughtering them.

The lefts hypocrissy knows no bounds.

In what way was Kermit defending him?

People like him (the journalist, not necessarily Kermit), should be ignored and denied the oxygen of infamy that they crave. I had never heard of him before so in a way he has probably obtained his objective.

So why dont people like you, Kerm, Gussett,et all ignore Farage, or the England First idiots, your the first ones to jump on any mail headline that even hints at anything remotley supportive of the right wing ? and yet you and Kerm tell me to ignore some little whiney pr1ck who has bad mouthed what is essentially a disabled person, to be honest I thought you lot would all over that what with him being actually disabled, But oh no, wait he's an ex squaddie so f*** him.

You lot make me wanna puke.

Firstly Nick hasn't posted on this. Secondly Farage and Britain First are also political parties and entities - So they're culpable. Now I agree you with you, f**k this little s**tstain, he's a c**t, but no ones saying 'f**k him he's a squaddie' or similar.

I tend to think both you and Kermit are right. I know I should ignore people like this and Katie Hopkins, Richard Littlejohn or that c**t on TalkSport, because they only do it to get a rise and get oxygen, but they specifically do it in such a way that it will offend certain people so much that they have to respond.

Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law.


I didn’t say nick had posted on this ? just where did I say that? I said that all the lefties including Nick, would be apoplectic with outrage if comments about an immigrant were made by some right wing loony (the polar opposite of this sh1t stain)say for example someone like that twerp Richard LittleJohn came out in his rag and made derogatory comments about the Migrants at Calais all being benefit cheats.

The left on here would go bonkers telling anyone who would listen, he was a nasty racist and should be shot for being so right wing.

My point is when it's one of their own being a complete and utter indefensible wnaker, they are, a) conspicuous by there absence or b) play it down as attention seeking and he deserves a smack on the wrists.

The double standards and hypocrisy at play here are all that I hate about the lefties of the world. Me personally I couldn’t give a flying monkey fcuk who you vote for, if your a dick, then your a dick (not aimed at anyone I hasten to add) for example, I am most certainly right of centre, however I believe Cameron is a slimy oik like toad who should fack off back to Eaton.

However Come on here and call Brown or Corbyn the same, (for they truly are fckutards of the highest order) and you get dogs abuse resulting in pseudo intelligent leftie posters calling you thick, because you don't agree that Corbyn (for example) is the second coming.

Thats my point.

You referred to Nick.

You took what was a very valid argument and point, in regards to this c**t Seymour, and then made it about 'knocking the left'. It undermines the validity of your initial point, which is right, by turning it into an argument of left vs right, which this really isn't. Its about right vs wrong, not winning or scoring points.

As for that kind of 'you don't agree with me' abuse, you yourself have been known to hand that out yourself to posters (admittedly I see it in a light hearted manner).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Richard Seymour - vile human being.