witch hunts
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Kermit8  Hevon 15 Sep 15 9.08am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Guilty or not no one can surely seriously think of anyone in their forties anything other than manipulative scum if seducing and fvcking a 13 year old? There are no mitigating circumstances danny IF she did do this. Doesn't matter whether part of him enjoyed it or not. He was a child when it allegedly started. However, she was found 'not guilty' so obviously she didn't do it. Of course not.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
jamiemartin721  Reading 15 Sep 15 9.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 15 Sep 2015 8.56am
All these celebrity hunts are conducted in a full blaze of publicity with dawn raids, press fanfares etc. Supposedly to get other 'victims' to come forward. The police advertise for 'victims', they actually say "you will be believed" without any mention of some sort of proof needed. Can't remember any appeals in places like Rotherham for victims to come forward - indeed they were told to go away and not cause trouble. Meanwhile the likes of Cliff Richard are currently subjected to the treatment, along with dead people like Heath. Allegations should of course be investigated, but discreetly. Generally I agree with this, particularly now that incidents like the Hall, Savile et al trials have resulted in a willingness to go forward, investigations should be conducted with discretion. That said, in order to build cases the police will require further witnesses and victims to come forward, notably in historical cases. The problem is, should we attribute the accused in these crimes only special privillages that we don't to accused individuals who are not famous or celebrity profiles. Whilst some people are found not guilty, others have been found guilty of very horrific crimes conducted against numerous victims over time. In some of these cases, the police and social services ignored these claims for fear of the celebrity and because of the status of the accusers. Rotherham is comparable to the Yewtree cases; the status of the individuals committing crimes were considered to be greater than those of the victims - and as a consequence of not investigating cases or bringing charges, offending continued and escalated to terrible proportions. It doesn't help that those convicted under Yewtree before being convicted utterly denied the accusations against them, and went on to call them fantasies, malicious lies and attempts to 'cash in'. There will always be some people who are caught in that middle ground. The answer maybe is to prosecute those who bring malicious cases to the full extent of the law where ever possible. Ultimately, the media maybe need to control their own 'frenzy' along with the police, on how they report events, especially prior to trial. The problem is I think you have to reach a balance. The police require victims to come forward in order to build a case. The rage that Paul Gambocinni refers to is also the same rage that victims feel at being ignored.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 15 Sep 15 10.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 15 Sep 2015 9.12am
Quote leggedstruggle at 15 Sep 2015 8.56am
All these celebrity hunts are conducted in a full blaze of publicity with dawn raids, press fanfares etc. Supposedly to get other 'victims' to come forward. The police advertise for 'victims', they actually say "you will be believed" without any mention of some sort of proof needed. Can't remember any appeals in places like Rotherham for victims to come forward - indeed they were told to go away and not cause trouble. Meanwhile the likes of Cliff Richard are currently subjected to the treatment, along with dead people like Heath. Allegations should of course be investigated, but discreetly. Generally I agree with this, particularly now that incidents like the Hall, Savile et al trials have resulted in a willingness to go forward, investigations should be conducted with discretion. That said, in order to build cases the police will require further witnesses and victims to come forward, notably in historical cases. The problem is, should we attribute the accused in these crimes only special privillages that we don't to accused individuals who are not famous or celebrity profiles. Whilst some people are found not guilty, others have been found guilty of very horrific crimes conducted against numerous victims over time. In some of these cases, the police and social services ignored these claims for fear of the celebrity and because of the status of the accusers. Rotherham is comparable to the Yewtree cases; the status of the individuals committing crimes were considered to be greater than those of the victims - and as a consequence of not investigating cases or bringing charges, offending continued and escalated to terrible proportions. It doesn't help that those convicted under Yewtree before being convicted utterly denied the accusations against them, and went on to call them fantasies, malicious lies and attempts to 'cash in'. There will always be some people who are caught in that middle ground. The answer maybe is to prosecute those who bring malicious cases to the full extent of the law where ever possible. Ultimately, the media maybe need to control their own 'frenzy' along with the police, on how they report events, especially prior to trial. The problem is I think you have to reach a balance. The police require victims to come forward in order to build a case. The rage that Paul Gambocinni refers to is also the same rage that victims feel at being ignored. Edited by jamiemartin721 (15 Sep 2015 9.13am) That's a very fair assessment Jamie and I agree with you on the points you make.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| oldcodger 06 Oct 15 3.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This is the kind of pedo abuse that some of the 'get your oats son' cobblers in this thread leads to [Link]
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 06 Oct 15 3.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote oldcodger at 06 Oct 2015 3.14pm
This is the kind of pedo abuse that some of the 'get your oats son' cobblers in this thread leads to [Link] Its a questionable father as well who thinks that his 11 year old son, banging at 21 year old, is fair game.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| oldcodger 06 Oct 15 3.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Oct 2015 3.16pm
Quote oldcodger at 06 Oct 2015 3.14pm
This is the kind of pedo abuse that some of the 'get your oats son' cobblers in this thread leads to [Link] Its a questionable father as well who thinks that his 11 year old son, banging at 21 year old, is fair game. Certainly. She was even a sexual partner of the Fathers previously so the whole story is disturbing on multiple levels. People need to get over this idea that this kind of abuse is excusable or some kind of education as long as the perpetrator is wearing lipstick.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Superfly The sun always shines in Catford 06 Oct 15 3.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote oldcodger at 06 Oct 2015 3.24pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Oct 2015 3.16pm
Quote oldcodger at 06 Oct 2015 3.14pm
This is the kind of pedo abuse that some of the 'get your oats son' cobblers in this thread leads to [Link] Its a questionable father as well who thinks that his 11 year old son, banging at 21 year old, is fair game. Certainly. She was even a sexual partner of the Fathers previously so the whole story is disturbing on multiple levels. People need to get over this idea that this kind of abuse is excusable or some kind of education as long as the perpetrator is wearing lipstick.
Lend me a Tenor 31 May to 3 June 2017 John McIntosh Arts Centre with Superfly in the chorus |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 06 Oct 15 4.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote oldcodger at 06 Oct 2015 3.24pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 06 Oct 2015 3.16pm
Quote oldcodger at 06 Oct 2015 3.14pm
This is the kind of pedo abuse that some of the 'get your oats son' cobblers in this thread leads to [Link] Its a questionable father as well who thinks that his 11 year old son, banging at 21 year old, is fair game. Certainly. She was even a sexual partner of the Fathers previously so the whole story is disturbing on multiple levels. People need to get over this idea that this kind of abuse is excusable or some kind of education as long as the perpetrator is wearing lipstick. That actually makes it more disturbing, as the father of the son, is probably going to be significantly older than this girl, who's already known as being simple and immature. The boy is described as 'sex mad' 11 year old. Wrong un family alert.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.