Asian family are driven from their home...
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Sedlescombe  Sedlescombe 04 Oct 15 7.13pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 6.48pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.42pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 6.40pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I was discussing the matter with Pefwin - so butt out. I'm not interested in your views.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
 Hrolf The Ganger 04 Oct 15 7.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 6.56pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.51pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.37pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.28pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "extremists" I invite you to show me extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
The idea that India is worse off now Britain has gone is demonstrable nonsense and I presume simply the product of your love of empire. The world's largest democracy was certainly shaped by British occupation. Ukraine was shaped by the Soviet Union. ALL countries are better off ruling themselves even (especially) when they make mistakes. Who are you to decide say America would be better off run by Australia, Ireland by Britain or Britain better of being run by Mexico. Whatever made you think you are the member of some master race that thinks it can run countries better than the people who live there. Yes I would love to live there. Though there are several others that would make the list starting with Iceland No I didn't. You are back tracking. As for India being demonstrably better off. Demonstrate it. Most of India's infrastructure is a result of British rule.
He is an lightweight in the WUM arena.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Sedlescombe Sedlescombe 04 Oct 15 7.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 6.56pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.51pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.37pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.28pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "extremists" I invite you to show me extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
The idea that India is worse off now Britain has gone is demonstrable nonsense and I presume simply the product of your love of empire. The world's largest democracy was certainly shaped by British occupation. Ukraine was shaped by the Soviet Union. ALL countries are better off ruling themselves even (especially) when they make mistakes. Who are you to decide say America would be better off run by Australia, Ireland by Britain or Britain better of being run by Mexico. Whatever made you think you are the member of some master race that thinks it can run countries better than the people who live there. Yes I would love to live there. Though there are several others that would make the list starting with Iceland No I didn't. You are back tracking. As for India being demonstrably better off. Demonstrate it. Most of India's infrastructure is a result of British rule.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 04 Oct 15 7.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 7.16pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 04 Oct 2015 6.56pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.51pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.37pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.28pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "extremists" I invite you to show me extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
The idea that India is worse off now Britain has gone is demonstrable nonsense and I presume simply the product of your love of empire. The world's largest democracy was certainly shaped by British occupation. Ukraine was shaped by the Soviet Union. ALL countries are better off ruling themselves even (especially) when they make mistakes. Who are you to decide say America would be better off run by Australia, Ireland by Britain or Britain better of being run by Mexico. Whatever made you think you are the member of some master race that thinks it can run countries better than the people who live there. Yes I would love to live there. Though there are several others that would make the list starting with Iceland No I didn't. You are back tracking. As for India being demonstrably better off. Demonstrate it. Most of India's infrastructure is a result of British rule.
Still waiting. You have got nothing to back up your statements. Rhetoric don't cut it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 04 Oct 15 7.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Re:Victorian times and Christian extremism. It did happen. I remember an episode of 'Little House on the Prairie' when most of the locals rejected a family for not being godly even though they were perfectly nice and were continually ostracised until Charles and his halo stepped in to show the townspeople the error of their intolerant ways. Edited by Kermit8 (04 Oct 2015 7.22pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 04 Oct 15 7.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.51pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.37pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.28pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 6.14pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 6.10pm
Quote Sedlescombe at 04 Oct 2015 5.34pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 11.18am
Quote susmik at 03 Oct 2015 11.12am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
When we ran India, the Muslim servants were the most troublesome.... the Hindus and Sikhs were pussy cats in comparison. What other religion has a holy book encouraging it's followers to kill "non believers" ?
I think invading their country and killing their people counts as extremism and they would certainly have regarded themselves as Christians. India IS much better off without British occupation self evidently. Financially they are clearly much better off but there is a very basic first principle. All countries are better off running themselves. Do you think Poland is better off run by the Poles rather than the Soviets? Strange question You are shifting, You said "extremists" I invite you to show me extremists in Victorian Britain. Your assertion about India being better off today without Britain clearly overlooks the fact that India would not be as it is today without British rule. Principle is too rigid. You say any country is better off ruling itself. Is Britain better for Roman and Norman rule ? There is a very strong case.
The idea that India is worse off now Britain has gone is demonstrable nonsense and I presume simply the product of your love of empire. The world's largest democracy was certainly shaped by British occupation. Ukraine was shaped by the Soviet Union. ALL countries are better off ruling themselves even (especially) when they make mistakes. Who are you to decide say America would be better off run by Australia, Ireland by Britain or Britain better of being run by Mexico. Whatever made you think you are the member of some master race that thinks it can run countries better than the people who live there. Yes I would love to live there. Though there are several others that would make the list starting with Iceland No I didn't. You are back tracking. As for India being demonstrably better off. Demonstrate it. Most of India's infrastructure is a result of British rule.
Secondly, there is much hand wringing on these boards by the right on know it all's about Trident. Yet India has developed nuclear bombs and a space programme to boot but cannot manage to develop working sewers, a power system that doesn't conk out every 15 minutes and roads that are not blocked to buggery. Therefore, intead of blaming British rule which ended over half a century ago, why don't you question the priorities of the Indian government? Unless of course, you are one of those Student leftie types that blames all the World's woes on Britiain and the U.S.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 04 Oct 15 7.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Kermit8 at 04 Oct 2015 7.21pm
Re:Victorian times and Christian extremism. It did happen. I remember an episode of 'Little House on the Prairie' when most of the locals rejected a family for not being godly even though they were perfectly nice and were continually ostracised until Charles and his halo stepped in to show the townspeople the error of their intolerant ways. Edited by Kermit8 (04 Oct 2015 7.22pm) You really have become a broken record. Yawn.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 04 Oct 15 7.28pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I think Sedlescome is confusing reality with an episode of It ain't Half Hot Mum where a brutal gang of Christian extremists with crucifixes bolted to their foreheads march into Calcutta and demand the locals love Jesus or be cast into a pit of rabid bulldogs. An easy mistake to make.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 04 Oct 15 8.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote matt_himself at 04 Oct 2015 7.25pm
Quote Kermit8 at 04 Oct 2015 7.21pm
Re:Victorian times and Christian extremism. It did happen. I remember an episode of 'Little House on the Prairie' when most of the locals rejected a family for not being godly even though they were perfectly nice and were continually ostracised until Charles and his halo stepped in to show the townspeople the error of their intolerant ways. Edited by Kermit8 (04 Oct 2015 7.22pm) You really have become a broken record. Yawn.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 05 Oct 15 9.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
.....Annnyyway. Can we leave 18th century indian part of the British empire, and instead have a look back at a Bunch of Muslim arseholes threatening a family to the point that they feel the need to move (for not being Muslim). Now change the colour and back ground of the bullying family to white working class, and I garuntee the Police would arrest and detain the trouble making racists. why has this not happened now ? And people wonder why knuckle dragging racists like Britain first are growing more popular everyday
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 05 Oct 15 9.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote matt_himself at 03 Oct 2015 4.34pm
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 03 Oct 2015 3.22pm
Quote matt_himself at 03 Oct 2015 10.59am
Quote nickgusset at 03 Oct 2015 10.56am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 03 Oct 2015 10.46am
Lefties won't believe this story Matt.... it's from the Daily Mail. Strange though that they believed the story about Cameron and the pig.... which was also a Daily Mail story? Double standards nick?
It's a shame. Goes to show how f***ed up religion can be.
Sounds like an NRA type argument. Imagine no religion, I wonder if you can......
In turn, please name one socialist paradise where all violence has been eradicated. I imagine you cannot name one... Where as capitalism has done a fantastic job of eradicating violence....
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 05 Oct 15 9.53am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 04 Oct 2015 7.28pm
I think Sedlescome is confusing reality with an episode of It ain't Half Hot Mum where a brutal gang of Christian extremists with crucifixes bolted to their foreheads march into Calcutta and demand the locals love Jesus or be cast into a pit of rabid bulldogs. An easy mistake to make.
Sedlescombe is a "lovely boy" though.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.