Walthamstow...
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Cucking Funt  Clapham on the Back 07 Oct 15 7.56pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Eat up, Syd.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| leggedstruggle Croydon 07 Oct 15 8.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?"
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 oldcodger 07 Oct 15 8.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote 7mins at 07 Oct 2015 3.19pm
There seemed to be a nasty undercurrent... the only bloke attacked by the group of youths was the Jewish chap, totally unprovoked... draw your own conclusions. Anyway he is fine, luckily (his words not mine) the guy that punched him, punches like a girl.
Edited by oldcodger (07 Oct 2015 8.11pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
.| sydtheeagle England 07 Oct 15 8.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah sorry. Been on a plane most of the day but you're right. I'll get back to it. Short answer though is clearly "yes." Uncontrolled anything is rarely a good idea, immigration or chocolate cake (and that is not to be dismissive, either.) But like all the best laid plans of mice and men it's how you determine the limits and then how you apply them that matter as much as the fact of limits themselves. All I could say superficially is that things like available jobs, available housing, available resources (healthcare, etc.) would all have to be counterbalanced with the undoubted benefits of immigration to determine an appropriate set of rules, a subject in which I am no expert so it's hard to go beyond the answer I've already given (in other words, yes I agree with limits but personally, I can't give you an answer off the cuff with regard to what those limits should be.) I think history pretty much dictates that unfettered anything doesn't usually result in widespread benefits, but shutting the borders is no more the answer either. To be honest, your question is not a difficult one to answer. Did you expect me to say something else?
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 07 Oct 15 8.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 8.12pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah sorry. Been on a plane most of the day but you're right. I'll get back to it. Short answer though is clearly "yes." Uncontrolled anything is rarely a good idea, immigration or chocolate cake (and that is not to be dismissive, either.) But like all the best laid plans of mice and men it's how you determine the limits and then how you apply them that matter as much as the fact of limits themselves. All I could say superficially is that things like available jobs, available housing, available resources (healthcare, etc.) would all have to be counterbalanced with the undoubted benefits of immigration to determine an appropriate set of rules, a subject in which I am no expert so it's hard to go beyond the answer I've already given (in other words, yes I agree with limits but personally, I can't give you an answer off the cuff with regard to what those limits should be.) I think history pretty much dictates that unfettered anything doesn't usually result in widespread benefits, but shutting the borders is no more the answer either. To be honest, your question is not a difficult one to answer. Did you expect me to say something else? I'm glad to hear that you agree that immigration has an adverse effect on "available jobs, available housing, available resources (healthcare, etc.)". You forgot low wages and community tensions too. Still hope for you yet as you want immigration controlled - as does jamiemartin. All you guys need to do now is to start supporting policies like EU withdrawal that will start to sort things out. (Perhaps for completeness you could run through the "undoubted benefits of immigration".)
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| oldcodger 07 Oct 15 8.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.19pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 8.12pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah sorry. Been on a plane most of the day but you're right. I'll get back to it. Short answer though is clearly "yes." Uncontrolled anything is rarely a good idea, immigration or chocolate cake (and that is not to be dismissive, either.) But like all the best laid plans of mice and men it's how you determine the limits and then how you apply them that matter as much as the fact of limits themselves. All I could say superficially is that things like available jobs, available housing, available resources (healthcare, etc.) would all have to be counterbalanced with the undoubted benefits of immigration to determine an appropriate set of rules, a subject in which I am no expert so it's hard to go beyond the answer I've already given (in other words, yes I agree with limits but personally, I can't give you an answer off the cuff with regard to what those limits should be.) I think history pretty much dictates that unfettered anything doesn't usually result in widespread benefits, but shutting the borders is no more the answer either. To be honest, your question is not a difficult one to answer. Did you expect me to say something else? I'm glad to hear that you agree that immigration has an adverse effect on "available jobs, available housing, available resources (healthcare, etc.)". You forgot low wages and community tensions too. Still hope for you yet as you want immigration controlled - as does jamiemartin. All you guys need to do now is to start supporting policies like EU withdrawal that will start to sort things out. (Perhaps for completeness you could run through the "undoubted benefits of immigration".)
Completeness does indeed involve pointing out the good and the bad. I too think we should reign in immigration but I'm not blind to the fact that immigrants have set up half a million businesses employing 1 million + people here. It's not simply a case of coming here and taking jobs, depressing wages and so on. It's a mixed picture and it is possible to be thankful and appreciative of those who do put their weight, while also getting to a point where we can set our own merit based system. A point systen like Australia perhaps.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Seth  On a pale blue dot 08 Oct 15 12.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah cos what we all need is another thread about f*cking immigration. Don't you ever have a day off?
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| sydtheeagle England 08 Oct 15 6.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Seth at 08 Oct 2015 12.46am
Yeah cos what we all need is another thread about f*cking immigration. Don't you ever have a day off? It's probably a pretty good barometer of what (some) people are obsessed with these days. Anyway, give it another 24 hours or so and we'll have this week's school shooting in America to distract us.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 08 Oct 15 7.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Seth at 08 Oct 2015 12.46am
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah cos what we all need is another thread about f*cking immigration. Don't you ever have a day off? Even Theresa May is now talking about the elephant in the room.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 08 Oct 15 7.42am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 7.41am
Quote Seth at 08 Oct 2015 12.46am
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah cos what we all need is another thread about f*cking immigration. Don't you ever have a day off? Even Theresa May is now talking about the elephant in the room. With a tissue of lies.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 08 Oct 15 7.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 08 Oct 2015 7.42am
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 7.41am
Quote Seth at 08 Oct 2015 12.46am
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah cos what we all need is another thread about f*cking immigration. Don't you ever have a day off? Even Theresa May is now talking about the elephant in the room. With a tissue of lies. You would say that wouldn't you.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 08 Oct 15 8.20am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 7.45am
Quote nickgusset at 08 Oct 2015 7.42am
Quote leggedstruggle at 08 Oct 2015 7.41am
Quote Seth at 08 Oct 2015 12.46am
Quote leggedstruggle at 07 Oct 2015 8.03pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 07 Oct 2015 7.50pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 07 Oct 2015 7.30pm
Girls fighting over a bloke, apparently. I guess it's not called Hoe Street for nothing. And there was me thinking it was high immigration levels that were preventing a cohesive society. When you've already go a sh1t sandwich, why not make it a triple decker, eh? Hi Syd - are you still considering your answer to my question that you said you would answer in due course? "Do you think immigration should be limited in any way? If so, why?" Yeah cos what we all need is another thread about f*cking immigration. Don't you ever have a day off? Even Theresa May is now talking about the elephant in the room. With a tissue of lies. You would say that wouldn't you.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.