War plane shot down over Turkey
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
| Hoof Hearted 01 Dec 15 10.18am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 30 Nov 2015 9.16pm
I see Corbyn is allowing Labour mp's a free vote in the Let's bomb Syria debate. Edited by nickgusset (30 Nov 2015 9.17pm)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 npn  Crowborough 01 Dec 15 10.27am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 30 Nov 2015 9.16pm
I see Corbyn is allowing Labour mp's a free vote in the Let's bomb Syria debate. Edited by nickgusset (30 Nov 2015 9.17pm)
For what it's worth, I'm not a pacifist, but I still have no idea what they are planning to bomb, what they plan to achieve, and what the end game is. I think that's more important than whether a whip is issued.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 01 Dec 15 11.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 01 Dec 15 11.51am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.46am
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| npn Crowborough 01 Dec 15 11.52am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.46am
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 01 Dec 15 11.56am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote chris123 at 01 Dec 2015 11.51am
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.46am
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 01 Dec 15 12.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.56am
Quote chris123 at 01 Dec 2015 11.51am
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.46am
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness.
Smarter than your average missile.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 01 Dec 15 12.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.46am
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness. Quite. I see no beneficiaries of this other than the companies that provide the ordinance dropped. They should maybe go after the oil smuggling operation, take out the captured oil fields, target those who are brokering the sale of IS oil, those that are laundering it and reselling it. Target the banks that are transferring the funds, and those who are managing their funds. Ultimately, that could cost IS 2-3m per day, plus for the most part, its all 'outside' Syria, and doesn't revolve around blowing people up. Of course it could expose a number of European Companies, Shipping Firms and Allies that are directly profiting from the money made from the black market oil provided by IS.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 01 Dec 15 12.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote npn at 01 Dec 2015 11.52am
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.46am
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness.
Especially given that the US and others, have spent the last year or so bombing the f**k out of targets in Syria. It'll make no difference to UK safety or IS, especially given we've been bombing targets in Syria under US command for over a year anyhow.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
The Sash  Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 02 Dec 15 9.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Dec 2015 11.46am
Bombing on its own won't work. It should be opposed simply on the grounds of military pointlessness.
I presume the money to pay for it will come from all those old folks homes that Gideon has forced local authorities to shut down. If we wanted to choke the f*** out of ISIS we should be bombing the Saudis
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 02 Dec 15 9.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
The military might of Nato ground troops v 30,000 of them. They'd all be seeing Allah a little bit quicker than they hoped. Won't happen, of course, but would make things a bit tidier in that part of Syria. The country is going to have to be partitioned sooner or later anyway.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 02 Dec 15 10.57am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Kermit8 at 02 Dec 2015 9.13am
The military might of Nato ground troops v 30,000 of them. They'd all be seeing Allah a little bit quicker than they hoped. Won't happen, of course, but would make things a bit tidier in that part of Syria. The country is going to have to be partitioned sooner or later anyway. Optimistic, its astonishing what 30,000 fighters, in a guerrilla conflict, can actually establish. Plus the estimate varies for 30,000 to 70,000 fighters. You have to remember that behind that figure will sit a lot of logistical, command and support individuals as well. 30,000 people actually doing the fighting is a pretty large figure. I think for NATO for each person actually fighting, there are at least five to eight people ensuring that capacity. So if IS has 30,000 in the field it wouldn't be a stretch to imagine it has up to 150,000 active members.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.