You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Recent Floods - Observations/Conclusions?
April 19 2024 6.43pm

The Recent Floods - Observations/Conclusions?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

 

Tom-the-eagle Flag Croydon 09 Dec 15 7.15pm

I think Milli Vanilli have a better answer.

[Link]

 


"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View rob1969's Profile rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 09 Dec 15 9.05pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend

Am fortunate I live in an area where flooding doesn't occur and feel extremely sorry for those who do and for those currently affected by flooding. However if I lived in such a venerable area think I would take some basic precautions to protect my own property. May be easier said than done but perhaps insurance companies could encourage/make recommendations in return for lower premiums - or at least some cover for those over wise uninsurable.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Sash's Profile The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 10 Dec 15 8.58am Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Cumbria is wet because it rains a lot, it has always been wet because it rains a lot, it will always be wet because it rains a lot.

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 10 Dec 15 10.44am

Quote The Sash at 10 Dec 2015 8.58am

Cumbria is wet because it rains a lot, it has always been wet because it rains a lot, it will always be wet because it rains a lot.


Cannot disagree Sash.... BUT... if you remove woodland from the Cumbrian hillsides all that rain cascades down the slopes rather than being absorbed by the tree roots and ends up in the rivers.

As I also said in my original post, the river courses have been straightened over the last few decades in mistaken belief it would help and now the flow of the river is much faster and creates more volume. If the original river courses were re-instated the flow would reduce and pools would form rather than a raging torrent of water over-topping futile flood defence systems.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Plane Flag Bromley 10 Dec 15 10.47am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 10 Dec 2015 10.44am

Quote The Sash at 10 Dec 2015 8.58am

Cumbria is wet because it rains a lot, it has always been wet because it rains a lot, it will always be wet because it rains a lot.


Cannot disagree Sash.... BUT... if you remove woodland from the Cumbrian hillsides all that rain cascades down the slopes rather than being absorbed by the tree roots and ends up in the rivers.

As I also said in my original post, the river courses have been straightened over the last few decades in mistaken belief it would help and now the flow of the river is much faster and creates more volume. If the original river courses were re-instated the flow would reduce and pools would form rather than a raging torrent of water over-topping futile flood defence systems.

...And rip up all that block paving in peoples gardens!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 10 Dec 15 10.51am

Quote Plane at 10 Dec 2015 10.47am

Quote Hoof Hearted at 10 Dec 2015 10.44am

Quote The Sash at 10 Dec 2015 8.58am

Cumbria is wet because it rains a lot, it has always been wet because it rains a lot, it will always be wet because it rains a lot.


Cannot disagree Sash.... BUT... if you remove woodland from the Cumbrian hillsides all that rain cascades down the slopes rather than being absorbed by the tree roots and ends up in the rivers.

As I also said in my original post, the river courses have been straightened over the last few decades in mistaken belief it would help and now the flow of the river is much faster and creates more volume. If the original river courses were re-instated the flow would reduce and pools would form rather than a raging torrent of water over-topping futile flood defence systems.

...And rip up all that block paving in peoples gardens!


Exactly Plane my wise old friend!

A lot of surface water would be absorbed into the ground if people retained front gardens as just that... rather than paving them over for car parking!

All this water gets directed to the storm drains then into the rivers increasing volume and flow!

It's not rocket salad guys!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View so many memories's Profile so many memories Flag basingstoke 10 Dec 15 12.31pm Send a Private Message to so many memories Add so many memories as a friend

Environment agency on the case.
Job well done I think.

deerhurst-flood-gate.jpg Attachment: deerhurst-flood-gate.jpg (170.84Kb)

 


Get it on-get it in-F**K OFF ALAN HANSEN!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Monkeyrush's Profile Monkeyrush Flag London 22 Dec 15 3.23pm Send a Private Message to Monkeyrush Add Monkeyrush as a friend

The opening post was like my geography degree on acid. Amazing.

Basically, mother nature will always win. You protect one area at the cost of another. Clear the trees I want the price of lamb to go down.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 23 Dec 15 11.53am

Quote Monkeyrush at 22 Dec 2015 3.23pm

The opening post was like my geography degree on acid. Amazing.

Basically, mother nature will always win. You protect one area at the cost of another. Clear the trees I want the price of lamb to go down.


Thanks!

I suspect you weren't being gracious - but I got that information listening to an "expert" on R4's Today programme.

I accept that Mother Nature is all powerful, but you can limit her effects by not removing natural defences to flooding.

For a start the fact that the majority of homeowners have replaced front lawns with concrete drives means all that water that usually soaks away is directed to the storm drains which swells the rivers and adds to any potential flood threat.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 27 Dec 15 2.15pm

What were the coalition warned a while back? I think it was something along the lines of, ' for every £1 "saved" in short-term flood defence maintenance/improvements costs £8 in long-term economic damage. '
Well listened Dave

Edited by nickgusset (27 Dec 2015 2.17pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View matthau's Profile matthau Flag South Croydon 27 Dec 15 2.23pm Send a Private Message to matthau Add matthau as a friend

haarp

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 27 Dec 15 2.46pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 27 Dec 2015 2.15pm

What were the coalition warned a while back? I think it was something along the lines of, ' for every £1 "saved" in short-term flood defence maintenance/improvements costs £8 in long-term economic damage. '
Well listened Dave

Edited by nickgusset (27 Dec 2015 2.17pm)

AH!! Now its an Issue? Hoofs right of course up to a point. We send millions of pounds overseas in Aid yet seem to treat our problems to a patchwork of the Army, Charity and good old British stoicism.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Recent Floods - Observations/Conclusions?