He would sh*t himself in a position of actual power.

It is. And also so s***. As has been the entire 'Remain' campaign ever since it got its arse handed to it on June 23rd.

And part of me struggles with that. Because they are meant to be the bright ones. They are meant to be the ones who went to University, who have the best jobs and who live lives' of comfort and ease. Yet they are thick as f***.

If we frame this as the Establishment v the rest of us, then the Establishment are actually not very clever. All we have had is insults and belittling and generally nothing other than the sort of abuse guaranteed to ensure that people carry on supporting Leave purely because that is how human nature works. You catch more flys with honey than s*** and yet all we have seen from those who supposedly have tasked themselves with persuading us thicko Leave types to change our minds is nothing other than every shade of excrement going.

It may reflect my own circles but the only people I know who have changed their mind about how they would vote if asked again are those who voted Remain first time around. Not because they think Leave has the stronger arguments but purely on the grounds that we had a vote, a majority ticked the Leave box and that needs to be honoured. That is how the game is played. Fair enough to me.

But these Remainer types still banging on about it are either stupid in a way that beggers belief or else the Establishment, for whatever reason, actually want us to leave.

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

More those who wrongly believe that they are morally superior but are in reality, just deluded fools.

To repeat, Mueller did not exonerate Trump from either "collusion" (which is not actually a crime) or obstruction. He made no judgements because that was not his role. It is either for a Judge to make, once Trump leaves office and is indicted, or for Congress to make if he is impeached prior to leaving office.

So you are 100% wrong to claim, as Trump does, that "There was no Russian collusion". There were just no Russian collusion indictments issued against Trump by Mueller because there were NO indictments of any kind issued by Mueller naming Trump because of the DoJ's reluctance to indict a sitting President. There have though been many indictments of Trump associates which also have Russian connections, alongside indictments of some Russians. No conspiracies involved. Just rock solid fact. There are others still in process in other courts, witnessed by the redactions.

Congress is now seeking to dig deeper into the background by following up the lead given to them by Mueller. Trump's blatant obstruction of their oversight role is plain to see, aided and abetted by a compliant AJ. The latest being him issuing an instruction to Don McGahn not to testify, using the flimsiest of excuses.

Are these the actions of an innocent man who just wants to be left alone to do his job?

Surely an innocent man, with nothing to hide or fear, would allow unfettered access to everyone and everything, clear up all doubt and make a fool of his accusers!

I know what my conclusion is and I think most objective observers come to the same one.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I've heard your argument millions of times in different ways and words, its borring.
We voted leave, not a deal. We voted a government into office with a leave manifesto, May has said over 100 times we are leaving,a majority voted for artical 50.

We are leaving and it's you and your type that have brought on the problems We have.
Sore losers.

I getting bored with repeating myself while you do your usual dancing around playing with terminology.

Here is a link to a podcast by Sam Harris (no fan of Trump). The podcast is called, 'What Does the Mueller Report Really Say? (with Benjamin Wittes)'.

[Link]

That formed my view as to what is actually actionable. Now unless you have something new to say on the matter go and bore someone else.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)