The idea that Boris wants a no deal is total bollocks.

I hope he does but I just don’t trust him or his party.

I haven't heard any "types" appearing worried it might work! Most seem confused by it's complexity, are still struggling to get their head around it and listening to the professional reactions for guidance.

I want it to work and be acceptable to all the interested parties but whose genuine objections also need to be respected. Let's now see what the EU say. If they can accept it then I sincerely hope that no-one in Parliament starts to play politics with it and would vote it through.

I remain sceptical. I don't trust Johnson an inch to not actually be playing political games himself, but I am quite prepared to see this work.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

What I commented on was the idea that guarantees can ever be given by a PM when they need to work through Parliament. Of course a promise CAN be delivered but it cannot be guaranteed.

I agree that Parliament should not have agreed to hold a referendum and trust that lesson has been learned for ever. The then government didn't expect to lose and did not anticipate all the difficulties that have followed with hindsight.

The current members of Parliament must do what their consciences tell them is now in our best interests. Not what they thought they were in 2016.

Do you seriously expect anyone, in any situation, not to adjust their position if their knowledge tells them it is needed?

Would you continue to play Benteke just because he scored goals in 2016?

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (02 Oct 2019 11.21pm)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

If you really need to ask that then you aren't going to believe me.

Unlawful prorogation. Sidelining Parliament. Playing politics with our future. Allowing personal ambition to replace the national interest. Trumpian tactics.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It seems he wanted to become PM at pretty much any cost.

He only signed up to the "leave" idea because he thought it would advance his own career. He is not a conviction politician. He is an opportunist.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Remoaners have been out thought and out flanked.

Let's get on with important things like shouting about Swinson's family income from EU

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.