EU law over UK law means we leave no deal according to this article. Has Boris played a blinder here!!

[Link]

I heard this recently. I still think Boris is hoping for a deal but it would be ironic if the Remainers were hosted by their own petard.

No doubt Gina Miller is already preparing her court case if this happens.

One more point

If you actually bothered to stop the negativity and insults and started to really read my posts you will see that I try to address this seriously, make some suggestions and also ask questions. It's very far from just constant repetition, although some folk seem incapable of seeing that.

When people repeat what I believe to be false claims then naturally they generate repeat denials. If those claims cease so will the need for the denials.

You, along with everyone else have a free choice whether to read what I write, or not, and to laugh at it if you want to. It matters not a jot to me.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Not much has changed then - It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.

In the name of God, go!

I would have expected such things have already been considered and prepared for.

As it is not just the wording of a law which matters, but the intent which underlies it, any attempt to circumvent it by chicanery would quickly attract the attention of the Supreme Court.

The EU would also not wish to see a legal trip wire being used to thwart the intentions of the UK Parliament so would find a way to overcome anything like this.

Nothing is certain at the moment but that looks like straw clutching to me.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It's clearly a legal matter but as the article pointed out if the UK parliament tried to end freedom of movement the UK courts would strike down that law as EU law supersedes it.

This is the problem when Parliament rushes through laws in a matter of days. Wiser and cooler heads might point out that their are implications that parliament has not considered.

I have no idea if any of this is true but it would be delicious if it was.

One more point