Player behaviour rules
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Goal Machine  The Cronx 20 Jul 16 7.58pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Smart move and long overdue. To be frank the way referees get treating by players is appalling. It's important for young children too who look up to premier league footballers, many will think it's acceptable to f and blind at referees and will no doubt do it themselves after watching Rooney on TV. Hopefully next it will be retrospective match suspensions if found guilty of diving. The FA appear to have got something right for a change
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Pete53  Hassocks 20 Jul 16 8.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Goal Machine
Smart move and long overdue. To be frank the way referees get treating by players is appalling. It's important for young children too who look up to premier league footballers, many will think it's acceptable to f and blind at referees and will no doubt do it themselves after watching Rooney on TV. Hopefully next it will be retrospective match suspensions if found guilty of diving. The FA appear to have got something right for a change I agree. I can't think of any other sport in which the referee/umpire etc. takes the abuse and intimidation that we see in football.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| sxp55 South Norwood 21 Jul 16 11.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
do what they do in Rugby - mike up the refs. will soon find out the biggest assholes in the game
@sxp55555 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Ray in Houston  Houston 21 Jul 16 4.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by sxp55
do what they do in Rugby - mike up the refs. will soon find out the biggest assholes in the game
In fact, they're already miced, it's just that we can't hear it. Sympathy for the refs would be easier if they were more transparent, rather than operating under a complete media blackout. Let's have the mics live, and the referees available for interview after the game. They're not volunteers and amateurs anymore - haven't been for a long time.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 21 Jul 16 4.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by sxp55
do what they do in Rugby - mike up the refs. will soon find out the biggest assholes in the game Even the worst lip readers out there could tell you the answer to that.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 26 Jul 16 4.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
what the fcuk happened to moving the free kick 10 yards nearer if there was dissent ?
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 26 Jul 16 5.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65
what the fcuk happened to moving the free kick 10 yards nearer if there was dissent ? Issue I had was that in certain circumstances (Original free kick not too far from penalty area) moving the free kick forward 10 yards penalised the attacking team as it made it more difficult for a free kick taker to get the ball over the wall and under the crossbar. Note : The free-kick never converted to a penalty if it was moved forward into the penalty area. Edited by Willo (26 Jul 2016 5.07pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 26 Jul 16 5.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Issue I had was that in certain circumstances (Original free kick not too far from penalty area) moving the free kick forward 10 yards penalised the attacking team as it made it more difficult for a free kick taker to get the ball over the wall and under the crossbar. Note : The free-kick never converted to a penalty if it was moved forward into the penalty area. Edited by Willo (26 Jul 2016 5.07pm) yep that was a bit annoying , but surely why didn't they make it that it was the attacking teams choice to move or not but I su[ppose that was too logical. anyway that rule seems to be have forgotten about . sorry didn't read your link , so they scrapped it , I thought it was a good idea Edited by richard shaw (og)65 (26 Jul 2016 5.44pm)
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 26 Jul 16 10.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Wasn't it because they said rugby playing nations couldn't understand it? Which is just a massive cop out.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 29 Jul 16 10.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
Wasn't it because they said rugby playing nations couldn't understand it? Which is just a massive cop out. I thought that's where they got the idea from ?
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 29 Jul 16 2.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65
I thought that's where they got the idea from ? They did. Then they decided it was unfair on non-rugby playing nations, as they apparently couldn't get their head around it. Whether they got penalised more than rugby playing nations or not because of that reason, I don't know.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.