You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Ban Islamic immigration. Yes or no?
April 25 2024 10.06pm

Ban Islamic immigration. Yes or no?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 10 of 14 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

 

View nairb75's Profile nairb75 Flag Baltimore 25 Jul 16 5.38pm Send a Private Message to nairb75 Add nairb75 as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Well yes, they are. Typically this is true of religious extremists, and most religious leaders on any scale.

Of course during that period, Islam, Christian Faiths and Judaism largely lived in a surprisingly peaceful basis, excepting the occasional Catholic based crusades.

The issue really has grown out of, I think, the corrupt ceasepit of Middle Eastern politics, and the failure of the post-Empire world to deliver some kind of reasonable or stable forms of government. Politics and violence are inseperable in many if not all of the major middle eastern nations (both by the state and by the protest movements).

This has fuelled the rise of Islamist Militant groups, especially since the end of the Soviet Union across the region, simply because peaceful protest movements don't last long.

Couple this with the funding and desire of Saudi Arabia to export the problem, has led to an infection within Islam that has become attractive - and convenient - for a number of preachers to exploit for their own gain. Ultimately delivering such horrors as IS and Boko Harem (organisations in which the end goal of 'independence' seems less important than 'headline grabbing horror'.

you can thank the saudis for spreading wahabaiism throughout the world. it's not a surprise how the extremism has grown since the saud's started this. you have poor, disillusioned young men in these countries who have zero updward mobility since they weren't born of the ruling family. and all of the sins in their life are due to the evil non-muslims.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 25 Jul 16 5.53pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

What a load of crap you write.

I want to continue to live in a secular country. I think it makes sense to support that concept.

If an incoming person is fine with this country having separation of church and state and doesn't inflict oppression and separatism upon people within their influence then I'm fine with them.....That goes with any religion.

In that sense their religion is irrelevant to me. However, If you think it's sensible to blindly ignore the increase of religious people who would prefer significant structural change in the country then really debate with people like you is pointless.

People like you with your sneering attitude with its implicit insinuations of racism are responsible for the climate of non-intervention and fear from otherwise good people which allows that internal oppression and separatism to exist within minority cultures without significant or useful challenge.

Essentially you are the problem just as much as the oppressors are.

Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Jul 2016 5.25pm)

It was a little tongue in cheek but you seem to have misunderstood something here. There is, of course, a serious point. If you can't see it then fair enough.

How exactly would the practicality of banning Muslims work? It wouldn't so it's a non-starter.

I fail to see how I am a problem at all, or know who you mean by the oppressors. I am merely responding in a satirical way to a real problem - which I thought was quite a British institution.

I too agree entirely with secularism but am unable to stop people being religious if they choose that.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 25 Jul 16 7.29pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

It was a little tongue in cheek but you seem to have misunderstood something here. There is, of course, a serious point. If you can't see it then fair enough.

How exactly would the practicality of banning Muslims work? It wouldn't so it's a non-starter.

I fail to see how I am a problem at all, or know who you mean by the oppressors. I am merely responding in a satirical way to a real problem - which I thought was quite a British institution.

I too agree entirely with secularism but am unable to stop people being religious if they choose that.

If you don't understand the problem of oppression within Islamic communities then you really should investigate the issue. In the last year I've worked a lot with Muslims and I've been privy to eye opening situations. Quite a few Muslims face two ways....a face for working within the typical British workplace and another very socially conservative face for home. Sometimes the friction between the two is very unhealthy.

Anyway looking at repression within Islamic communities may result in you debating the issues without recourse to 'tongue in cheek' insinuations perhaps.

If you read my posts then you'd say that I've never said I'd ban all Muslims whether it was practicable or not. I've already put down my criteria and plenty of Muslims would pass it and be welcome.

How can secularism be protected? Ideas on the practical methods to protect the future of secularism would be an interesting thread.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 25 Jul 16 8.02pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

If you don't understand the problem of oppression within Islamic communities then you really should investigate the issue. In the last year I've worked a lot with Muslims and I've been privy to eye opening situations. Quite a few Muslims face two ways....a face for working within the typical British workplace and another very socially conservative face for home. Sometimes the friction between the two is very unhealthy.

Anyway looking at repression within Islamic communities may result in you debating the issues without recourse to 'tongue in cheek' insinuations perhaps.

If you read my posts then you'd say that I've never said I'd ban all Muslims whether it was practicable or not. I've already put down my criteria and plenty of Muslims would pass it and be welcome.

How can secularism be protected? Ideas on the practical methods to protect the future of secularism would be an interesting thread.

Indeed it would Stirling.

It could be one of the key battlegrounds of the coming centuries.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 25 Jul 16 8.50pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Indeed it would Stirling.

It could be one of the key battlegrounds of the coming centuries.

Many think the struggle over the enlightenment is over..It was in the traditional west...over hundreds of years its European concepts and ideals have been built upon and enabled the marvel that modern life provides.

People forget that Islamic countries didn't have the enlightenment....As has been famously said, nothing important in Arabic has been written for five hundred years. The mindset of the traditional middle east is of a different order. It has made use of western technologies and selected advancements without being apart of its ethos....indeed rejecting many social advancements that we consider even basic here.

I will add though that this is obviously a generalization and that many people break free of the constraints and limitations that restrictive cultures and regimes push upon them. They want something else.

These people are welcome.....I just don't care for the rest.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 25 Jul 16 9.01pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Many think the struggle over the enlightenment is over..It was in the traditional west...over hundreds of years its European concepts and ideals have been built upon and enabled the marvel that modern life provides.

People forget that Islamic countries didn't have the enlightenment....As has been famously said, nothing important in Arabic has been written for five hundred years. The mindset of the traditional middle east is of a different order. It has made use of western technologies and selected advancements without being apart of its ethos....indeed rejecting many social advancements that we consider even basic here.

I will add though that this is obviously a generalization and that many people break free of the constraints and limitations that restrictive cultures and regimes push upon them. They want something else.

These people are welcome.....I just don't care for the rest.

Me neither.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Paul67's Profile Paul67 Flag 25 Jul 16 9.06pm Send a Private Message to Paul67 Add Paul67 as a friend

How about we only let muslims live in their own area's, Then when that becomes socially exceptable we could cram them all onto trains and send them to their own camps.
I'm actually surprised Britain First haven't suggested this before.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View leifandersonshair's Profile leifandersonshair Flag Newport 25 Jul 16 9.07pm Send a Private Message to leifandersonshair Add leifandersonshair as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Many think the struggle over the enlightenment is over..It was in the traditional west...over hundreds of years its European concepts and ideals have been built upon and enabled the marvel that modern life provides.

People forget that Islamic countries didn't have the enlightenment....As has been famously said, nothing important in Arabic has been written for five hundred years. The mindset of the traditional middle east is of a different order. It has made use of western technologies and selected advancements without being apart of its ethos....indeed rejecting many social advancements that we consider even basic here.

I will add though that this is obviously a generalization and that many people break free of the constraints and limitations that restrictive cultures and regimes push upon them. They want something else.

These people are welcome.....I just don't care for the rest.

Good points there.

In some ways, perhaps the current troubles are indicative of enlightenment for many Muslim's (particularly the young) living in the west. The 'westernisation' of Muslim youth is one of the big complaints of radicals, but that doesn't stop it continuing apace.

A generation of young Muslims are growing up in a modern society in a modern world all across Western Europe. In another generation, who knows where this might lead?

On topic- no. Cannot ban immigration based on a particular religion. That is the thin end of the wedge- next we'll be banning all those with squinty eyes, who look a bit funny, or are ginger. Banning all religious people though, that could be a winner...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 25 Jul 16 10.34pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Paul67

How about we only let muslims live in their own area's, Then when that becomes socially exceptable we could cram them all onto trains and send them to their own camps.
I'm actually surprised Britain First haven't suggested this before.

This post shook me to the core...I haven't seen English like that first sentence since I took a cover lesson for 7S4.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 25 Jul 16 10.57pm

Originally posted by dannyh


absolutely Jamie, however when was the last time a sandal wearing God botherer, blew himself to bits taking women and children with him, stabbed a young un and his mum for wearing swim wear, went on the rampage killing loads of people with a gun on a night out, axed people to death on train.

Your constant reference to the Christian world is about 200 years out of date. Also the IRA and their bombing campaign against mainland UK was not entirely based on religion, true enough the two sides were different brands of sky monkey, however the main reason was the occupation of Ireland by the English.

religion as always has become the excuse.

Well here's a few somewhat more recent than 1816...

1. The Knoxville Unitarian Universalist Church Shooting.Jim David Adkisson, a devout Christian and anti-abortion right-winger, walked into a Knoxville church on July 27th, 2008, and began firing a shotgun at children who were performing Annie Jr. He killed two and wounded seven, targeting “the church because of its liberal teachings and his belief that all liberals should be killed because they were ruining the country.”

2. The Campaign of Terror Against Abortion Doctors.In 1993, Dr. Richard Gunn was shot dead by an anti-abortion protester. In 1994, Drs. John Britton and James Barrett were shot to death by Reverend Paul Jennings. In 1998, Dr. Barnett Sleipan was shot dead in his home by a Christian terrorist. In 2009, Dr. George Tiller was shot by Scott Roeder in a church. According to the National Abortion Federation, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, 13 wounded, 100 butyric acid attacks, 373 physical invasions, 41 bombings, 655 anthrax threats, and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers since 1977.

3. The 1995 Oklahoma City Bombings.Timothy McVeigh, America’s most notorious domestic terrorist, was obsessed with the Seventh-Day Aventist splinter group known as the Branch Davidians, who resisted an ATF raid on their citadel at Mount Carmel in 1993. He travelled to Waco, Texas during the Waco Siege and heavily supported the religious extremists within it. Two years later, he detonated a fertilizer bomb at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing a hundred and sixty-eight people, including nineteen children, and wounded 648 others.

4. The Massacre At Zion Emmanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C.On 17 June 2015, a man rose from a pew in the historically black Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, SC, and opened fire with a .45 caliber pistol, killing nine worshipers, including pastor and State Senator Clementa Pickiney. The shooter has been photographed wearing patches representing the racist apartheid regimes in Southwest Africa, had a Confederate license plate on his vehicle. All signs points to this being a hate crime- not only is it the oldest black church in the South, it was a symbol of resistance against slavery, and a survivor reported that the shooter yelled ‘I have to do it. You rape our women and you’re taking over our country. And you have to go.” Roof was a member of a local Lutheran church

Edited by legaleagle (25 Jul 2016 10.58pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 25 Jul 16 11.00pm

Originally posted by nairb75

you can thank the saudis for spreading wahabaiism throughout the world. it's not a surprise how the extremism has grown since the saud's started this. you have poor, disillusioned young men in these countries who have zero updward mobility since they weren't born of the ruling family. and all of the sins in their life are due to the evil non-muslims.

Yup...through the Muslim World League,active in a town near you as we write...

Edited by legaleagle (25 Jul 2016 11.01pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 25 Jul 16 11.27pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

Well here's a few somewhat more recent than 1816...

1. The Knoxville Unitarian Universalist Church Shooting.Jim David Adkisson, a devout Christian and anti-abortion right-winger, walked into a Knoxville church on July 27th, 2008, and began firing a shotgun at children who were performing Annie Jr. He killed two and wounded seven, targeting “the church because of its liberal teachings and his belief that all liberals should be killed because they were ruining the country.”

2. The Campaign of Terror Against Abortion Doctors.In 1993, Dr. Richard Gunn was shot dead by an anti-abortion protester. In 1994, Drs. John Britton and James Barrett were shot to death by Reverend Paul Jennings. In 1998, Dr. Barnett Sleipan was shot dead in his home by a Christian terrorist. In 2009, Dr. George Tiller was shot by Scott Roeder in a church. According to the National Abortion Federation, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, 13 wounded, 100 butyric acid attacks, 373 physical invasions, 41 bombings, 655 anthrax threats, and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers since 1977.

3. The 1995 Oklahoma City Bombings.Timothy McVeigh, America’s most notorious domestic terrorist, was obsessed with the Seventh-Day Aventist splinter group known as the Branch Davidians, who resisted an ATF raid on their citadel at Mount Carmel in 1993. He travelled to Waco, Texas during the Waco Siege and heavily supported the religious extremists within it. Two years later, he detonated a fertilizer bomb at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, killing a hundred and sixty-eight people, including nineteen children, and wounded 648 others.

4. The Massacre At Zion Emmanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C.On 17 June 2015, a man rose from a pew in the historically black Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, SC, and opened fire with a .45 caliber pistol, killing nine worshipers, including pastor and State Senator Clementa Pickiney. The shooter has been photographed wearing patches representing the racist apartheid regimes in Southwest Africa, had a Confederate license plate on his vehicle. All signs points to this being a hate crime- not only is it the oldest black church in the South, it was a symbol of resistance against slavery, and a survivor reported that the shooter yelled ‘I have to do it. You rape our women and you’re taking over our country. And you have to go.” Roof was a member of a local Lutheran church

Edited by legaleagle (25 Jul 2016 10.58pm)

What is the point of this post?

Are you suggesting some kind of comparison? Of these killings though having previously looked into the Timothy McVeigh case I can most definitely say that he didn't kill anyone though religious conviction....he said himself that he had, 'sort of lost touch with'(Catholicism).

Hence McVeigh shouldn't really be in your post.

No doubt you were just pasting dubious material from the Internet without actually knowing about the cases yourself.


 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 10 of 14 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Ban Islamic immigration. Yes or no?