BBC bias against Trump

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 24 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Stirlingsays 31 Jul 16 8.14pm
Originally posted by buzby1 Wonder if there were nice fair-minded Germans who thought their media was biased against Hitler in 1933? How unsporting! Trump is a very dangerous human being. The last thing this world needs is a maniac like that in the White house. Any person with a grain of sense should be biased against that lunatic. Trump isn't Hitler and to even make this comparison shows where the real lunacy comes from. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

31 Jul 16 8.14pm

Originally posted by buzby1

Wonder if there were nice fair-minded Germans who thought their media was biased against Hitler in 1933? How unsporting! Trump is a very dangerous human being. The last thing this world needs is a maniac like that in the White house. Any person with a grain of sense should be biased against that lunatic.

Trump isn't Hitler and to even make this comparison shows where the real lunacy comes from.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 31 Jul 16 8.19pm
Originally posted by Jimenez You think the BBC are bad. Try living over here!! You don't have a tax payer funded channel that's meant not to take sides or at least to criticise both sides equally. The US channels are very biased its true but then they are commercially and/or privately funded. In America you choose your channels due to your politics. In Britain with the BBC this shouldn't be the case....unfortunately the BBC is not where is should be with political impartiality. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jul 2016 8.19pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

31 Jul 16 8.19pm

Originally posted by Jimenez

You think the BBC are bad. Try living over here!!

You don't have a tax payer funded channel that's meant not to take sides or at least to criticise both sides equally.

The US channels are very biased its true but then they are commercially and/or privately funded.

In America you choose your channels due to your politics.

In Britain with the BBC this shouldn't be the case....unfortunately the BBC is not where is should be with political impartiality.

Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jul 2016 8.19pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 31 Jul 16 8.24pm
There is no commentary in these clips at all I have just been there again. They are just Trump and the couple talking there is no other commentary at all. This man has been found out and you can't stand it.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 31 Jul 16 8.24pm

There is no commentary in these clips at all I have just been there again.

They are just Trump and the couple talking there is no other commentary at all.

This man has been found out and you can't stand it.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 31 Jul 16 8.32pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 There is no commentary in these clips at all I have just been there again. They are just Trump and the couple talking there is no other commentary at all. This man has been found out and you can't stand it. The commentary I'm complaining about is the BBC commentary in the article and the headline. It's loaded one sided commentary....biased opinion like yours. You have a right to that....The BBC don't. Originally I'm sure this page did contain anti Trump US commentary on one of the clips. Though this isn't really what annoys me. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

31 Jul 16 8.32pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

There is no commentary in these clips at all I have just been there again.

They are just Trump and the couple talking there is no other commentary at all.

This man has been found out and you can't stand it.

The commentary I'm complaining about is the BBC commentary in the article and the headline. It's loaded one sided commentary....biased opinion like yours. You have a right to that....The BBC don't.

Originally I'm sure this page did contain anti Trump US commentary on one of the clips. Though this isn't really what annoys me.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 31 Jul 16 8.53pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Of course you are but a tax payer funded organization that is meant to be impartial shouldn't be. Not everyone is as anti Trump as you are. Within the UK yes it should be politically impartial but not sure why that would have to extend to other countries otherwise they would have to sit on the fence with regard to some of the most appalling brutality committed over the years especially in places like Nigeria and the old Yugoslavia. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 31 Jul 16 8.53pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Of course you are but a tax payer funded organization that is meant to be impartial shouldn't be.

Not everyone is as anti Trump as you are.

Within the UK yes it should be politically impartial but not sure why that would have to extend to other countries otherwise they would have to sit on the fence with regard to some of the most appalling brutality committed over the years especially in places like Nigeria and the old Yugoslavia.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 31 Jul 16 8.53pm
Originally posted by elgrande The only issues I have are people telling me what I should think.(but for the record I think he's a complete loon.). But funnily enough I have made my own mind up about that. An assertion is not an order. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 31 Jul 16 8.53pm

Originally posted by elgrande

The only issues I have are people telling me what I should think.(but for the record I think he's a complete loon.).
But funnily enough I have made my own mind up about that.

An assertion is not an order.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 31 Jul 16 9.03pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays You don't have a tax payer funded channel that's meant not to take sides or at least to criticise both sides equally. The US channels are very biased its true but then they are commercially and/or privately funded. In America you choose your channels due to your politics. In Britain with the BBC this shouldn't be the case....unfortunately the BBC is not where is should be with political impartiality. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jul 2016 8.19pm) PBS is partly funded by my tax dollar I believe. Pro USA & Israel
Alert a moderator to this post

Jimenez

SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 31 Jul 16 9.03pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

You don't have a tax payer funded channel that's meant not to take sides or at least to criticise both sides equally.

The US channels are very biased its true but then they are commercially and/or privately funded.

In America you choose your channels due to your politics.

In Britain with the BBC this shouldn't be the case....unfortunately the BBC is not where is should be with political impartiality.

Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jul 2016 8.19pm)

PBS is partly funded by my tax dollar I believe.

Pro USA & Israel

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 31 Jul 16 9.08pm
Whilst i agree in principle in this case and with Trump i think its difficult to be unbiased when dealing with someone who has no policy or anything endorsing him other than fear mongering, nonsense rhetoric and narciscism. In this case there is no need to be impartial. But in most others definately "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 31 Jul 16 9.08pm

Whilst i agree in principle in this case and with Trump i think its difficult to be unbiased when dealing with someone who has no policy or anything endorsing him other than fear mongering, nonsense rhetoric and narciscism.

In this case there is no need to be impartial. But in most others definately

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Penge Eagle Beckenham 31 Jul 16 9.17pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays I wouldn't say that I'm particularly pro Trump but I'm most definitely pro fair treatment and I for one am sick to death of a tax funded institution like the BBC being so overtly one sided in its presentations and views on the US election. I'm just made a complaint over one of their webpage articles. [Link] The BBC should not be pro or anti Trump. Now I am based in the US with a more balanced view of both Trump and Clinton, by seeing US media and speaking to lots of different people, I can definitely agree with you. Trump is not PC, but for the BBC to ONLY report his eccentric soundbytes and paints a distorted view to those in the UK. Of course, he does say some wacky things and I don't agree with much of what he says. However, Hilary Clinton is not the answer for America and has said much of what Trump has about Mexico in the past. She lies has been shown to be very dodgy... Yet does the BBC get this message across? It seems the BBC is more interested in people clicking on their Trump videos as it gets more hits. But they're supposed to be a public service provider. How about this BBC publishing a video like this? [Link] Edited by Penge Eagle (31 Jul 2016 9.22pm)
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 31 Jul 16 9.17pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I wouldn't say that I'm particularly pro Trump but I'm most definitely pro fair treatment and I for one am sick to death of a tax funded institution like the BBC being so overtly one sided in its presentations and views on the US election.

I'm just made a complaint over one of their webpage articles.
[Link]

The BBC should not be pro or anti Trump.

Now I am based in the US with a more balanced view of both Trump and Clinton, by seeing US media and speaking to lots of different people, I can definitely agree with you.

Trump is not PC, but for the BBC to ONLY report his eccentric soundbytes and paints a distorted view to those in the UK. Of course, he does say some wacky things and I don't agree with much of what he says.

However, Hilary Clinton is not the answer for America and has said much of what Trump has about Mexico in the past. She lies has been shown to be very dodgy... Yet does the BBC get this message across?

It seems the BBC is more interested in people clicking on their Trump videos as it gets more hits. But they're supposed to be a public service provider.

How about this BBC publishing a video like this? [Link]

Edited by Penge Eagle (31 Jul 2016 9.22pm)

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Hrolf The Ganger 31 Jul 16 9.23pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 Whilst i agree in principle in this case and with Trump i think its difficult to be unbiased when dealing with someone who has no policy or anything endorsing him other than fear mongering, nonsense rhetoric and narciscism. In this case there is no need to be impartial. But in most others definately This is a contradiction. You are either unbiased or not. You can't pick and choose or that is, well, biased. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (31 Jul 2016 9.24pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

31 Jul 16 9.23pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

In this case there is no need to be impartial. But in most others definately

This is a contradiction.

You are either unbiased or not. You can't pick and choose or that is, well, biased.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (31 Jul 2016 9.24pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

chris123 hove actually 31 Jul 16 9.26pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger This is a contradiction. You are either unbiased or not. You can't pick and choose or that is, well, biased. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (31 Jul 2016 9.24pm) Of course you can, it all depends on how strongly you feel about something.
Alert a moderator to this post

chris123

hove actually 31 Jul 16 9.26pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

This is a contradiction.

You are either unbiased or not. You can't pick and choose or that is, well, biased.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (31 Jul 2016 9.24pm)

Of course you can, it all depends on how strongly you feel about something.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 31 Jul 16 9.44pm
Originally posted by chris123 Of course you can, it all depends on how strongly you feel about something. The BBC should be impartial. It is not there to tell us how to think.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

31 Jul 16 9.44pm

Originally posted by chris123

Of course you can, it all depends on how strongly you feel about something.

The BBC should be impartial. It is not there to tell us how to think.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 24 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

BBC bias against Trump

Site Map

Sponsors