BBC forced to apologise again

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

jamiemartin721 Reading 11 Aug 16 9.27am
I don't think they should apologise. A simple 'the views of our commentators don't represent the views of the BBC' should largely be taken as read. A whole dozens of people complained via twitter. Nothing on twitter is ever newsworthy "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 11 Aug 16 9.27am

I don't think they should apologise. A simple 'the views of our commentators don't represent the views of the BBC' should largely be taken as read.

A whole dozens of people complained via twitter. Nothing on twitter is ever newsworthy

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Stuk Top half 11 Aug 16 9.48am
If they were "forced to apologise" don't you think they'd put the apology in the article? That would be better if titled, "t***s get angry at harmless, off the cuff remark". Edited by Stuk (11 Aug 2016 9.49am) Edited by Stuk (11 Aug 2016 9.49am) Optimistic as ever
Alert a moderator to this post