Team v Sunderland
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Canterbury Palace  Whitstable 01 Feb 17 2.59pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Ward -Dann - Delaney - Sakho - PVA McArthur - Milivojevic Zaha - Schlupp Benteke Almost certainly won't be the team but I'd like to see it at some point. Edited by Canterbury Palace (01 Feb 2017 2.59pm)
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold... |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| gambler Kent 01 Feb 17 3.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mad4palace
4 May 2013: Crystal Palace 3 - 2 Peterborough That was the last league game we won without Puncheon. Trying to get my head around this. What exactly does this mean? He's played in so many of the games that we haven't won so surely it means nothing?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Eaglecoops CR3 01 Feb 17 3.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
If all fit then this would be my 4-4-1-1 My belief is that if Luka (I will learn how to spell his surname at some point) is playing the defensive midfield role then we do not need 3 centrebacks, well certainly not against the lower teams at home anyway. Hennessey Ward Dann Sakho PVA Luka Zaha Puncheon McArthur Schlupp
I can also see this system working if Remy plays at the expense of Puncheon and Cabaye drops back into midfield proper. I believe this set up plays to the strengths of the guys in those positions. I agree there is a time and a place to play 5 at the back, but Sunderland at home is probably not one of them.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dangermouse Hastings 01 Feb 17 3.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
12 players, sneaky......
That's Life |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Username Horsham 01 Feb 17 3.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by gambler
Trying to get my head around this. What exactly does this mean? He's played in so many of the games that we haven't won so surely it means nothing? It's pretty meaningless I agree. Plus, if you wanted to, you could suggest that maybe it means he under performs in too many games.
Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bexleydave Barnehurst 01 Feb 17 3.55pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
Ward -Dann - Delaney - Sakho - PVA McArthur - Milivojevic Zaha - Schlupp Benteke Almost certainly won't be the team but I'd like to see it at some point.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| alaneagle1 Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 01 Feb 17 4.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by gambler
Trying to get my head around this. What exactly does this mean? He's played in so many of the games that we haven't won so surely it means nothing? We have only won premier league matches when Punch plays. We also very rarely win when Cabaye is on the pitch at 90 minutes. He had been subbed again last night and we won.
Palace 13th 2017/18. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rabbit-Tooth London 01 Feb 17 4.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
No room for Kelly ? Lol
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eagle@ tn34 hastings 01 Feb 17 4.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
It looks more like a formation lined up to face chariots. Or an arrow head pointing at the goal marching at ramming speed to the sound of the HF drum......so no back passes allowed.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 01 Feb 17 5.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mad4palace
4 May 2013: Crystal Palace 3 - 2 Peterborough That was the last league game we won without Puncheon. Technically it would be the league play offs (or final), but disturbingly that could be true, if you drop FA Cup games. I certainly couldn't find anything that suggested otherwise. He even featured in Holloways only stand out win, against Sunderland.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Direwolf Lincoln 01 Feb 17 6.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Much as I'd like to see Luka play (he should be fit after all) I think Sam will stick with the team he played against Bournemouth. His primary goal is to keep clean sheets and three CB's is his recipe for that. Even though we are at home Sam will be perfectly happy with another 2-0.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  01 Feb 17 6.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Direwolf
Much as I'd like to see Luka play (he should be fit after all) I think Sam will stick with the team he played against Bournemouth. His primary goal is to keep clean sheets and three CB's is his recipe for that. Even though we are at home Sam will be perfectly happy with another 2-0. But I would think that if he again needs to replace McArthur later on as has been the case with his work rate we will be bringing on Milevojevic and not Ledley.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.