You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > British Values?
April 16 2024 1.37pm

British Values?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 37 of 40 < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 >

 

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Mar 17 1.30pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

It all must matter, each citizens rights are as important as the next citizens rights. Most of the corruption in public services, is however around external contract provision from the private sector and its quite blatant.

self-censored again.

Edited by hedgehog50 (03 Mar 2017 1.43pm)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 03 Mar 17 1.50pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I disagree, migration doesn't create the environment, that environment was already there, it does however often change the people who are committing the crime. Yes, migrant communities are likely to end up in poorer and more socially deprived areas, and as such more affected by crime indicators in some instances - however its not always the case. Indian migration (and to a lesser extent pakistani migration) in the 70s and 80s, didn't really result in a spike in ethnic crime, despite the tendency for these groups to end up in poor and deprived areas. Indeed, statistically people within these groups were more likely to experience crime and violence, than be the perpetrator of it.

Accepting your noted exceptions, are you saying that, statistically, immigrants don't commit more crime?
If you are, can that be supported with credible statistics?
If you are saying that they just replace the existing criminals with crime remaining constant, can that be supported with statistics? Can recorded stats really tell the whole story anyway?
Accepting their limitations, without stats, one can only rely on anecdotal evidence and it's a bit pointless debating around that.
I could mention knife, gun and street crime growing enormously since Windrush started Caribbean immigration but that would be anecdote without proof.

My attitude is really about securing the best living environment for my family. I couldn't care less about pointing fingers or politics. Personal experience tends to sway attitudes but they remain just that. It is of no consequence to anyone else.

Am I the only person getting bored with this subject?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 03 Mar 17 3.06pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Accepting your noted exceptions, are you saying that, statistically, immigrants don't commit more crime?
If you are, can that be supported with credible statistics?

I'm not convinced that saying immigrants commit more crime, actually provides any real value, in light of the evidence pointing towards social and economic evidence.

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
If you are saying that they just replace the existing criminals with crime remaining constant, can that be supported with statistics? Can recorded stats really tell the whole story anyway?

More or less constant, I suspect in the initial migrations, that crime rates might drop, and then rise with later generations. With Indian and pakistani migration, there wasn't any 'crime wave'. Also, crimes committed against immigrants and their families probably are less likely to have been recorded.

The advantage of stats is that they're empirical data, collected regionally, and nationally. We're not looking to tell a story, so much as determine patterns.

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Accepting their limitations, without stats, one can only rely on anecdotal evidence and it's a bit pointless debating around that.

Not necessarily, but its analysis is much more complicated - and you'd be limited to looking more at attitudes towards ethnicity and crime, than patterns in crime.

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I could mention knife, gun and street crime growing enormously since Windrush started Caribbean immigration but that would be anecdote without proof.

It'd be untrue, what you'd be seeing is a spike in a region possibly, and it appears this way because of the way its been reported - and because when we say gun crime and knife crime, we mean shootings and stabbings, typically gang related.

However if you look at the experience of the Flying Squad, and include armed robberies, where the use of a fire arm was common place. Throw in things like republican and loyalist terrorism and related criminal funding activities of those groups - and the picture really does change.

In terms of knife crime, this isn't really a new thing. The 60s saw plenty of stabbings and knife related violence and the heyday of British knife crime was the 1930s.

Also the ethnicity factor becomes somewhat questionable when you look at the history of knife crimes in Glasgow.

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

My attitude is really about securing the best living environment for my family. I couldn't care less about pointing fingers or politics. Personal experience tends to sway attitudes but they remain just that. It is of no consequence to anyone else.

Am I the only person getting bored with this subject?

I suspect personal experiences are more about where people live, rather than ethnicity and crime. Areas like Norwood have always had problems with crime even back when it was a very white area, and those problems seem to have increased not so much in line with migration, but the fact that the area has seen a decreasing levels of employment and wages, that have produced increasing levels of poverty and social dysfunction caused by the stresses of poverty.

Adding migration into areas, where employment is low, and wages are low, just adds to the problem. You have more people competing for jobs, that barely cover a subsistence level existence - and that breeds the kind of factors that feed into criminality.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 03 Mar 17 3.39pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I suspect personal experiences are more about where people live, rather than ethnicity and crime. Areas like Norwood have always had problems with crime even back when it was a very white area, and those problems seem to have increased not so much in line with migration, but the fact that the area has seen a decreasing levels of employment and wages, that have produced increasing levels of poverty and social dysfunction caused by the stresses of poverty.

Adding migration into areas, where employment is low, and wages are low, just adds to the problem. You have more people competing for jobs, that barely cover a subsistence level existence - and that breeds the kind of factors that feed into criminality.

Well I'm not going to hold you to actually producing data to support those assertions because unlike some of our left leaning friends on here, I actually believe that they are more about reason than bias.
I don't really disagree in general with any of that other than to say that life seems to have got cheaper in my lifetime and that attitude seems to have come from elsewhere.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 03 Mar 17 3.46pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Well I'm not going to hold you to actually producing data to support those assertions because unlike some of our left leaning friends on here, I actually believe that they are more about reason than bias.
I don't really disagree in general with any of that other than to say that life seems to have got cheaper in my lifetime and that attitude seems to have come from elsewhere.

It could be said that every generation has this attitude.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 03 Mar 17 3.51pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

It could be said that every generation has this attitude.

It would be interesting to have a totally impartial overview not coloured by the limits of lifespan or circumstances but that is not afforded to us sadly.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Mar 17 5.15pm

The Indian community in the UK have very low crime rates, are hard working, good citizens, beneficial to the country - as are the Jewish and Chinese communities.

Edited by hedgehog50 (03 Mar 2017 5.19pm)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 03 Mar 17 5.24pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

The Indian community in the UK have very low crime rates, are hard working, good citizens, beneficial to the country - as are the Jewish and Chinese communities.

Edited by hedgehog50 (03 Mar 2017 5.19pm)

I agree.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pista Flag Bristol 03 Mar 17 5.37pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I don't normally get involved in General Talk when the clique are in full flow but you picked a very unusual example of corporate crime.

Rolls Royce appear to have bribed people to win contracts that kept thousands of British workers employed and from a xenophobic point of view it was positive for Britain

I agree. Of course the people whose pockets were lined at the taxpayers expense are often rather unsavoury and of course bribery can hide genuine problems with competitiveness which don't get addressed if decisions are made only on the basis of brown envelopes and Cypriot bank accounts. So in the long term it is bad for jobs because bribery as a way making sales isn't sustainable (yet).

But how about tax evasion then? I particularly enjoyed a recent headline in the Mail about how HMRC has failed to convict anymore than one non-dom tax avoider in the past x years for tax avoidance.

Of course the Mail failed to mention that HMRC hasn't succeeded in getting Lord Rothermere to pay his fair share of taxes either.

 


old time bbs refugee

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Pista Flag Bristol 03 Mar 17 5.40pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

I'm still trying to get my head around the assertion that the left don't care about ordinary people.

Let me know if you succeed. I decided not to pursue that particular oxymoron (especially whilst there are plenty of ordinary morons to pursue).

 


old time bbs refugee

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Pista Flag Bristol 03 Mar 17 5.43pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

OK, I got confused with Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Limited which is wholly owned by BMW.
The main point really is that the old lady who has her life savings stolen should be more of a concern to ordinary decent people than some backhanders betweeen businesses. The liberal left are more worried about attacking the wicked Capitalists than in doing anything to protect old ladies.

Rolls Royce cars is a tiny little business by comparison with the defence and civil aviation one.

The money stolen from the exchequer by corporate criminals would be available to the NHS and the police. So the little old lady has less chance of being robbed and if she is then she doesn't have to wait for 6 hours on a trolley to get stitched up.

Get your priorities in order please.

 


old time bbs refugee

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Mar 17 5.56pm

Originally posted by Pista

Let me know if you succeed. I decided not to pursue that particular oxymoron (especially whilst there are plenty of ordinary morons to pursue).

Why don't they vote for you then?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 37 of 40 < 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > British Values?